Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 21:13 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 21:13

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2014
Posts: 263
Own Kudos [?]: 328 [4]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
WE:Project Management (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5425 [1]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Feb 2018
Posts: 63
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 61
Send PM
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5425 [0]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Re: A scientist planted two groups of plants under identical conditions [#permalink]
Expert Reply
kanthaliya wrote:
Why not C is the correct option? I did not understand the answer please help me with this question.


Hey kanthaliya ,

I am happy to help. :-)

You need to understand that whenever we weaken something, we should NOT attack the premise. Premises are considered a source of truth and they should NEVER be broken.

Now, in the argument we have been told that the plants didn't die due to traffic sound. And then the conclusion was made. I cannot say plants died after several weeks. Since it has been told me that they didn't die, I have to consider that the truth. This is what option C is doing. It is trying to break the premise.

Does that make sense?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Posts: 302
Own Kudos [?]: 192 [0]
Given Kudos: 115
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
Send PM
Re: A scientist planted two groups of plants under identical conditions [#permalink]
How do u negate e..? Can anybody help..i thought e was spot on..

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Status:EAT SLEEP GMAT REPEAT!
Posts: 114
Own Kudos [?]: 183 [0]
Given Kudos: 143
Location: India
Send PM
Re: A scientist planted two groups of plants under identical conditions [#permalink]
Hi csaluja

I think E is in a way strengthening the Argument.

csaluja wrote:
why is option E incorrect?


Quote:
(E)The plants in the group for which he played city traffic sounds required more water than the scientist actually gave them.


E is stating that The other group requires more water, Ok but who cares!.It is giving us reason that inspite of the lack of water they survived.

A on the other hand weakens the Argument considerably.

+1 if this helps!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Feb 2018
Posts: 314
Own Kudos [?]: 290 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
Re: A scientist planted two groups of plants under identical conditions [#permalink]
(A) The scientist put different varieties of plants in each group. - doesn't sound that good. Let's move on and see if there is a better answer.

(B) The light affecting the plants changed according to the time of day. - so what ?? For which plant and which not. Not specific. Eliminate.

(C) The plants in the group for which he played city traffic sounds died several weeks after the experiment. - so what ?? Did it for before the previous one. If so, it goes against the premise. We can't assume anything like this.

(D) The plants were all purchased at the same time. - strengthens. Eliminate.

(E) The plants in the group for which he played city traffic sounds required more water than the scientist actually gave them. - ok. But this does not give us any information about the plant for which thunder was played.

By POE, A is best then.

Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 May 2016
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 51 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Send PM
Re: A scientist planted two groups of plants under identical conditions [#permalink]
abhimahna wrote:
kanthaliya wrote:
Why not C is the correct option? I did not understand the answer please help me with this question.


Hey kanthaliya ,

I am happy to help. :-)

You need to understand that whenever we weaken something, we should NOT attack the premise. Premises are considered a source of truth and they should NEVER be broken.

Now, in the argument we have been told that the plants didn't die due to traffic sound. And then the conclusion was made. I cannot say plants died after several weeks. Since it has been told me that they didn't die, I have to consider that the truth. This is what option C is doing. It is trying to break the premise.

Does that make sense?



Hey. I don't think we are attacking the premise by choosing C. The premise says that the plants thrived during the experiment. It doesn't say that they continued to thrive post the experiment. Option C talks about the period several weeks after the experiment.

Please let me know if my logic is incorrect.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A scientist planted two groups of plants under identical conditions [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne