NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 16:15 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 16:15
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
   1   2   3   
Tags:
Difficulty: 555-605 Levelx   Meaning/Logical Predicationx   Parallelismx   Pronounsx   Subjunctivex                           
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
L
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63668 [2]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   27 Jun 2018, 11:55
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Hero8888 wrote:
Shouldn't "proposed" require subjunctive mood here: proposed + that + be?
In what cases can we ommit this rule? Thanks

You're thinking of one particular trigger for the subjunctive mood: "bossy verb" + "that." Examples might include "recommended that" or "required that" or "demanded that." All of these would require the use of subjunctive.

But if we don't have the word "that," there's no need for the subjunctive. It's perfectly acceptable to have "proposed" + "noun," as we do in the OA here. These, for example, are totally fine:

  • Tim proposed an equitable solution to the problem.
  • Governor Hickenlooper proposed groundbreaking legislation that would offer free carne asada burritos to GMAT tutors in Colorado.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
G
Hero8888
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Dec 2017
Posts: 302
Own Kudos [?]: 307 [0]
Given Kudos: 273
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q44 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.25
WE:Marketing (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   27 Jun 2018, 13:23
GMATNinja wrote:
But if we don't have the word "that," there's no need for the subjunctive. It's perfectly acceptable to have "proposed" + "noun," as we do in the OA here. These, for example, are totally fine:

  • Tim proposed an equitable solution to the problem.
  • Governor Hickenlooper proposed groundbreaking legislation that would offer free carne asada burritos to GMAT tutors in Colorado.

I hope that helps!


Hi GMATNinja,
Thanks for your response. It became clearer now. Yet I have 2 questions:

1. Does "bossy verb" + "noun" formula work with any verb from the list: demand, suggest, request, recommend, stipulate, mandate, insist, and dictate?

2. In some cases, such as "report suggests that the Earth was..." or " we don't use subjunctive. How to recognize the pattern in which "that" exists, but subjunctive is not required? Any other verbs from the list above can follow the pattern?

Regards
User avatar
L
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63668 [2]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   30 Jun 2018, 15:14
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Hero8888 wrote:
GMATNinja wrote:
But if we don't have the word "that," there's no need for the subjunctive. It's perfectly acceptable to have "proposed" + "noun," as we do in the OA here. These, for example, are totally fine:

  • Tim proposed an equitable solution to the problem.
  • Governor Hickenlooper proposed groundbreaking legislation that would offer free carne asada burritos to GMAT tutors in Colorado.

I hope that helps!


Hi GMATNinja,
Thanks for your response. It became clearer now. Yet I have 2 questions:

1. Does "bossy verb" + "noun" formula work with any verb from the list: demand, suggest, request, recommend, stipulate, mandate, insist, and dictate?

2. In some cases, such as "report suggests that the Earth was..." or " we don't use subjunctive. How to recognize the pattern in which "that" exists, but subjunctive is not required? Any other verbs from the list above can follow the pattern?

Regards


1. For the most part, yes: you can use most of those verbs with just a noun. Here, have some more examples:

    "The teacher demanded silence."
    "I recommend the avocado tuna roll with just a hint of wasabi." (Mmm... avocado tuna rolls.)

I suppose there are also some situations in which you'd need a preposition before the noun:

    "Tim insisted on the purple drapes."

The broader point is that English is incredibly flexible and complicated - all of the verbs in that list can be used in ways other than to introduce the subjunctive mood.

2. "Suggest" has multiple meanings. It could be used to mean "recommend," or "propose", and in those situations, "suggest" may introduce the subjunctive the same way another "bossy verb" might. But it could also be used to mean "express" or "implies," in which case, it wouldn't be so bossy anymore, and the subjunctive wouldn't be called for.

But there's no reason to devote much brain space to absorbing this idea. Consider a similar example to the one you offered: "The report suggests that the Earth was unusually hot last year." Surely it doesn't make any sense to write, "The report suggests that the Earth be unusually hot..." The report isn't telling the Earth what to do!

Put another way, we can't just go on autopilot, scan the sentence, and look for words that necessitate the use of the subjunctive. We have to understand the meaning of the sentence and use context clues to determine what construction is best. That may not be a terribly satisfying answer, but it's true.

Here's the bigger takeaway: I insist that you be careful about relying too much on rote memorization! (See what I did there?) The subjunctive shows up occasionally on the GMAT, but it's relatively rare. If you were to try to memorize a list of bossy verbs, then attempt to internalize all the exceptions for when the subjunctive shouldn't be used, and repeat this process for every issue you could possibly encounter on an SC question, your head is going to explode. (At least mine would.) The better approach is to use logic and context, coupled with a limited collection of truly essential grammar concepts, to determine what construction works best.

I hope this helps!
User avatar
B
ravikumarmishra
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Aug 2009
Posts: 52
Own Kudos [?]: 17 [0]
Given Kudos: 89
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   15 Aug 2018, 14:51
GMATNinja: in choice C>> "proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent, the amount from the previous year that was allocated". Doesn't it mean>> "to reduce the amount from the previous year" and can be eliminated so do other choices as well based on the same reasoning. Please confirm if this is correct interpretation.
User avatar
L
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63668 [2]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   17 Aug 2018, 06:54
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
ravikumarmishra wrote:
GMATNinja: in choice C>> "proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent, the amount from the previous year that was allocated". Doesn't it mean>> "to reduce the amount from the previous year" and can be eliminated so do other choices as well based on the same reasoning. Please confirm if this is correct interpretation.

Sadly, I'm not sure what you're asking, but I'll give it a shot. (C) is wrong because the parallel construction creates an illogical meaning.

Quote:
Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor proposed to reduce by nearly 17 percent, the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.

According to this version of the sentence, the city's mayor is proposing to do two things:

    1) He's proposing to reduce the amount of money allocated for maintenance of cultural institutions.
    2) He's proposing to subsidize the local arts groups.

In what kind of fantasy world would the mayor respond to a budget gap by proposing to give money to arts groups? (A magical one, one where the children all have tap shoes and the streets are paved in sheet music from Gershwin musicals.) (C) is wrong because it makes no sense.

Contrast this with (A):

Quote:
Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.

Now the mayor is proposing two things:

    1) A reduction in the amount of money allocated to maintain cultural institutions
    2) A reduction in the amount of money allocated to subsidize local arts groups.

Reducing money to local arts groups is a far more coherent response to a budget gap, albeit a depressing one. (A) is correct because it's the more logical construction.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
B
ravikumarmishra
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Aug 2009
Posts: 52
Own Kudos [?]: 17 [0]
Given Kudos: 89
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   17 Aug 2018, 07:22
GMATNinja wrote:
ravikumarmishra wrote:
GMATNinja: in choice C>> "proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent, the amount from the previous year that was allocated". Doesn't it mean>> "to reduce the amount from the previous year" and can be eliminated so do other choices as well based on the same reasoning. Please confirm if this is correct interpretation.

Sadly, I'm not sure what you're asking, but I'll give it a shot. (C) is wrong because the parallel construction creates an illogical meaning.

Quote:
Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor proposed to reduce by nearly 17 percent, the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.

According to this version of the sentence, the city's mayor is proposing to do two things:

    1) He's proposing to reduce the amount of money allocated for maintenance of cultural institutions.
    2) He's proposing to subsidize the local arts groups.

In what kind of fantasy world would the mayor respond to a budget gap by proposing to give money to arts groups? (A magical one, one where the children all have tap shoes and the streets are paved in sheet music from Gershwin musicals.) (C) is wrong because it makes no sense.

Contrast this with (A):

Quote:
Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.

Now the mayor is proposing two things:

    1) A reduction in the amount of money allocated to maintain cultural institutions
    2) A reduction in the amount of money allocated to subsidize local arts groups.

Reducing money to local arts groups is a far more coherent response to a budget gap, albeit a depressing one. (A) is correct because it's the more logical construction.

I hope that helps!


Thanks a lot GMATNinja for your elaborate response and I apologize for not clearly asking what I intended. Let me try again, here is my interpretation of the answer choices:

(B) proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent in the amount it was allocating to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and for subsidizing

The highlighted part does not make sense to me. To me, the highlighted means>> reduction of a certain percentage of Amount from an Year

(C) proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent, the amount from the previous yearthat was allocated for the maintenance of the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize.

The highlighted part does not make sense to me. To me, the highlighted means>> Reduce some percentage of Amount from an Year.

(D) has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city’s major cultural institutions, and to subsidize

Same interpretation as for choice B above.

(E) was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city’s major cultural institutions and for the subsidization.

Same interpretation as for choice C above.

(A) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize.

The highlighted part here makes perfect sense as it clearly mentions>> Reduction in amount

Could you please confirm if this is correct interpretation of the answer choices.
avatar
B
apple0073603
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Dec 2018
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   24 Mar 2019, 02:54
Dear Expert,
I have a question regarding the none underline part: why not "in the previous year"?
It seems strange "amount allocated the previous year", since "the previous year" is a noun and follows the verb "allocated"

thanks in advance!
User avatar
B
Connor1396
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Dec 2018
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 22 [3]
Given Kudos: 87
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21 HBS '21
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   08 Apr 2019, 05:48
3
Kudos
Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.


(A) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize

(B) proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent in the amount it was allocating to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and for subsidizing (previous year’s amount?)

(C) proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent, the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize (previous year’s amount?)

(D) has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city’s major cultural institutions, and to subsidize (previous year’s amount?)


(E) was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city’s major cultural institutions and for the subsidization (previous year’s amount?)



GMATNinja daagh KyleWiddison

Hi experts,
Is the highlighted part a case of wrong comparison. Should it not be "previous year's amount" rather than previous year.

Using this i eliminated BCDE but i could not find this in any of the explanations.
Kindly help
User avatar
L
daagh
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [0]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   08 Apr 2019, 09:51
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
Connor wrote

Quote:
Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.

GMATNinja daagh KyleWiddison

Hi experts,
Is the highlighted part a case of wrong comparison. Should it not be "previous year's amount" rather than the previous year.

Using this I eliminated BCDE but i could not find this in any of the explanations.
Kindly help


Let's just deal with your pointed issue choice by choice.

(A) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize-- The phrase 'Reduction in the amount' makes it clear that it is the amount that is being reduced and not the year.

(B) proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent in the amount it was allocating to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and for subsidizing (previous year’s amount?) -- A reduction from the previous year is illogical Can anyone reduce a year. The comparison has somehow failed to mention the word 'amount.'

(C) proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent, the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize (previous year’s amount?) -- But C makes it clear that it is the amount that is being reduced. Please read it slowly. The word 'the amount ' is popping out in front. How could you miss that? Therefore C is wrong not for the reason of comparison parallelism but for other reasons such as lack of parallelism between" for the maintenance and to subsidize"


(D) has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city’s major cultural institutions, and to subsidize (previous year’s amount?) I agree with you. "A reduction from the previous year" is illogical Add to the parallelism issue we discussed in C.

(E) was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city’s major cultural institutions and for the subsidization (previous year’s amount?) I agree with you in this case too. In addition, a proposal does not entail a subjunctive mood. It is just a proposal and further has to go through some rounds of voting and in the end; the proposal may even be dropped. Then, what does the word 'they' refer to? GOK!

Therefore, you may now see that wherever the word 'amount' is mentioned, we cannot find fault with it.

However, do you have to struggle this much to solve this? IMO. That approach is not required as far as this GMAT SC question is concerned. One can simply look at parallelism and rule out in a single stroke all the other choices but A.

A -- to maintain and to subsidize-- Parallelism is ok.
B -- To maintain and for subsidizing -- Parallelism is not ok.
C-- for the maintenance and to subsidize-- Parallelism is not ok
D-- for maintaining, and to subsidize -- Parallelism is not Ok
E. -- for maintaining and for the subsidization -- Parallelism is not ok

Connor, this is just a suggestion.

Thanks for your nice query. You deserve a Kudos
avatar
B
mahi816
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Dec 2016
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 47
Send PM
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   08 Apr 2019, 18:26
GMATNinja

I could see that it is mentioned 'to maintain' and 'for subsidising' are parallel as both are prepositional phrases.

But to maintain is an infinitive which cannot be parallel to prepositional phrase.

Please provide a clear explanation for this, as i am following all your videos and i don't want any gaps.

Thanks for your help.
User avatar
L
AjiteshArun
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5181
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [0]
Given Kudos: 631
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   08 Apr 2019, 23:12
Expert Reply
mahi816 wrote:
GMATNinja

I could see that it is mentioned 'to maintain' and 'for subsidising' are parallel as both are prepositional phrases.

But to maintain is an infinitive which cannot be parallel to prepositional phrase.

Please provide a clear explanation for this, as i am following all your videos and i don't want any gaps.

Thanks for your help.
In the correct option, to maintain is parallel to to subsidize.

As for to maintain and for subsidizing, you are correct: they are not very parallel, and that's a good reason to remove the second option.
User avatar
S
zvazviri
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 58
Own Kudos [?]: 121 [0]
Given Kudos: 67
Send PM
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   23 Jun 2019, 00:46
eyunni wrote:
Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.


(A) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize

(B) proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent in the amount it was allocating to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and for subsidizing

(C) proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent, the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize

(D) has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city’s major cultural institutions, and to subsidize

(E) was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city’s major cultural institutions and for the subsidization



Verbal Question of The Day: Day 61: Sentence Correction


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here


Show Spoiler
https://www.nytimes.com/1996/02/06/arts/the-arts-are-again-invited-to-the-budget-dance.html

This time, in the face of an estimated $2.75 billion city budget gap over the next year and a half, the Mayor has proposed a reduction of nearly 17 percent from last year in the amount spent to maintain New York's major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups. The preliminary budget announced by the Mayor last week sought about $65 million for the major groups and $7 million for the smaller ones for those purposes in the fiscal year 1997, which begins July 1, compared with $84 million in the current budget. Other cultural appropriations bring the total to $98.1 million.





Eliminate B through E for parallelism errors:

B - To maintain and for subsidizing - not parallel
C - for the maintenance and to subsidize - not parallel
D - for maintaining and to subsidize - not parallel
E - for maintaining and for the subsidization - not parallel

The "it" in B and D has no antecedent. City's is in a possessive phrase and cannot be the antecedent. Same thing with the "they" in E.
User avatar
L
AnirudhaS
LBS Moderator
Joined: 30 Oct 2019
Posts: 836
Own Kudos [?]: 775 [0]
Given Kudos: 1577
Send PM
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   09 Feb 2020, 13:44
(A) Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated ______ the previous year to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.

I felt like there is some word missing here (shown by underscore above). Word like - in/to/for. Am I missing something here? GMATNinja help please!
User avatar
L
AjiteshArun
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5181
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [2]
Given Kudos: 631
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   10 Feb 2020, 00:56
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
AnirudhaS wrote:
(A) Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated ______ the previous year to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.

I felt like there is some word missing here (shown by underscore above). Word like - in/to/for. Am I missing something here? GMATNinja help please!
Hi AnirudhaS,

The the previous year is directly modifying allocated. To see this, let's add a that after amount:

... the amount that was allocated the previous year...
is like saying
... the amount that was allocated last year...

Another example:
He went to Colombo the year before.
User avatar
S
LIBERTYRodP
Tutor
Joined: 30 Jan 2019
Posts: 127
Own Kudos [?]: 69 [0]
Given Kudos: 14
Send PM
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   10 Feb 2020, 06:12
Expert Reply
One important thing with the meaning is that TO SUBSIDIZE must be parallel to TO MAINTAIN. Those are two activities in which the the amount of money was invested.

Once we are aware of that this exercise becomes fairly easy.



Best,





Verbal Question of The Day: Day 61: Sentence Correction


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here


Show Spoiler
https://www.nytimes.com/1996/02/06/arts/the-arts-are-again-invited-to-the-budget-dance.html

This time, in the face of an estimated $2.75 billion city budget gap over the next year and a half, the Mayor has proposed a reduction of nearly 17 percent from last year in the amount spent to maintain New York's major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups. The preliminary budget announced by the Mayor last week sought about $65 million for the major groups and $7 million for the smaller ones for those purposes in the fiscal year 1997, which begins July 1, compared with $84 million in the current budget. Other cultural appropriations bring the total to $98.1 million.
[/quote]
User avatar
S
LIBERTYRodP
Tutor
Joined: 30 Jan 2019
Posts: 127
Own Kudos [?]: 69 [0]
Given Kudos: 14
Send PM
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   10 Feb 2020, 06:13
Expert Reply
One important thing with the meaning is that TO SUBSIDIZE must be parallel to TO MAINTAIN. Those are two activities in which the the amount of money was invested.

Once we are aware of that this exercise becomes fairly easy.



Best,





Verbal Question of The Day: Day 61: Sentence Correction


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here


Show Spoiler
https://www.nytimes.com/1996/02/06/arts/the-arts-are-again-invited-to-the-budget-dance.html

This time, in the face of an estimated $2.75 billion city budget gap over the next year and a half, the Mayor has proposed a reduction of nearly 17 percent from last year in the amount spent to maintain New York's major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups. The preliminary budget announced by the Mayor last week sought about $65 million for the major groups and $7 million for the smaller ones for those purposes in the fiscal year 1997, which begins July 1, compared with $84 million in the current budget. Other cultural appropriations bring the total to $98.1 million.
[/quote][/quote]
User avatar
S
SairamRamo
Current Student
Joined: 02 Sep 2019
Posts: 78
Own Kudos [?]: 70 [0]
Given Kudos: 82
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: Simon '23 (WL) Sauder '23 (D) ISB'22 (D) Merage (A$) BU Questrom '23 (WL) Schulich Sept '23 (I)
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
WE:Information Technology (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   31 Jul 2020, 04:13
We need to look for a split which satisfies parallelism

A) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize

(B) proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent in the amount it was allocating to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and for subsidizing

(C) proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent, the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize

(D) has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city’s major cultural institutions, and to subsidize

(E) was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city’s major cultural institutions and for the subsidization
User avatar
P
hero_with_1000_faces
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2016
Status:Studying 4Gmat
Posts: 366
Own Kudos [?]: 96 [0]
Given Kudos: 314
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Darden '22 Marshall '22 AGSM '23
GMAT 1: 590 Q37 V33
GPA: 4
WE:Law (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   Updated on: 08 Aug 2020, 05:48
I wish questions could apply make up, coz this one is so ugly.

In addition to all great answer, it is worth noting the illogical part in this question

Quote:
(A) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize

Makes sense - reduction in the amount

Quote:
(B) proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent in the amount it was allocating to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and for subsidizing


No not reduction from previous year, it is reduction from amount of previous year.
Quote:
(C) proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent, the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize


to reduce the amount from the previous year. Nope same problem.
Quote:
(D) has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city’s major cultural institutions, and to subsidize


very convulated - a reduction from the previous year. Eliminate.
Quote:
(E) was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city’s major cultural institutions and for the subsidization.


amount they were allocating be reduced from previous year - Complelety Banal.

Originally posted by hero_with_1000_faces on 08 Aug 2020, 05:47.
Last edited by hero_with_1000_faces on 08 Aug 2020, 05:48, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
S
DanTe02
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2020
Posts: 121
Own Kudos [?]: 63 [0]
Given Kudos: 70
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
Schools: Wharton '23
WE:Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   11 Sep 2020, 09:06
This question can be solved without parallelism

Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.


(A) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize

(B) proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent in the amount it was allocating to maintain the city’s major cultural institutions and for subsidizing [what does it refer to? technically nothing makes sense here and it cannot refer to mayor]
(C) proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent, the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city’s major cultural institutions and to subsidize [ Okay this looks like 17 percent is actually the amount that was allocated previous year meanwhile the sentence meant to say that 17 percent will be reduced from that amount subtle but its there]

(D) has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city’s major cultural institutions, and to subsidize

(E) was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city’s major cultural institutions and for the subsidization

Let me know if my thought process is okay
avatar
G
fireagablast
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Jun 2019
Posts: 275
Own Kudos [?]: 89 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink] New post   07 Dec 2020, 18:49
I would add one thing that GMATNinja didn't highlight in his solution was that C says "for the maintenance of" where as a simply uses "to maintain".
My understanding is that the GMAT would much rather use the infinitive "to maintain" rather than the awkward "for the maintenance of"
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s mayor propos [#permalink]
07 Dec 2020, 18:49
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions