Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 08:26 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 08:26

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 301
Own Kudos [?]: 428 [35]
Given Kudos: 331
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.76
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618955 [5]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
General Discussion
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jan 2017
Posts: 259
Own Kudos [?]: 85 [2]
Given Kudos: 932
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 301
Own Kudos [?]: 428 [3]
Given Kudos: 331
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.76
Send PM
Re: The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet comple [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Madhavi1990 wrote:
I picked C, and when saw OA, did a doubletake. But probably this is a form of 'two layers' in reasoning?
My two cents:
The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet complementary. Each sense is thought to have its own range of stimuli that are incapable of stimulating the other senses. However, recent research has discovered that some people taste a banana and claim that they are tasting blue, or see a color and say that it has a specific smell. This shows that such people, called synesthesiacs, have senses that do not respect the usual boundaries between the five recognized senses.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Synesthesiacs demonstrate a general, systematic impairment in their ability to use and understand words. Would parallel or reflect in other abilities too - this shows that there is a cognition issue and not an overlap - thus they use INCORRECT words while describing phenomenon, leading to 'overlap of sense' conclusion
(B) Recent evidence strongly suggests that there are other senses besides sight, touch, smell, hearing, and taste.
(C) The particular ways in which sensory experiences overlap in synesthesiacs follow a definite pattern - felt that this went against the general 'overlap' of senses as observed.
(D) The synesthetic phenomenon has been described in the legends of various cultures.
(E) Synesthesiacs can be temporarily rid of their synesthetic experiences by the use of drugs

Really liked this one. Here's hoping I won't pick the bait again :D
Any comments on how to avoid these 'trap' conclusions? thank you!


Madhavi D is out of scope...conclusion is that such people, with synethesiacs" do not respect the boundaries and thus capable of stimulating other senses....we want to prove that its wrong...these senses still respect the boundaries...D says that this phenomenon is described in he legends of various culture...in fact it strengthen that it exist and capable of simulating other senses
A says that those with synesthesiacs lost the ability to understand words...it means senses do not overlap...but its the person who lost he ability to understand words and thus he/she taste banana but forget who to spell banana...hope it helps
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2011
Posts: 56
Own Kudos [?]: 16 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: United States (NY)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.17
WE:Other (Accounting)
Send PM
Re: The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet comple [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Answer is A.

One of the assumptions is that those Synes can accurately describe the smell and color in words.

A clearly destroys such assumption, hence weakening the argument.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Jul 2018
Posts: 25
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 104
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
Send PM
Re: The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet comple [#permalink]
GMATNinja please help - I picked C over A. Please explain why C is incorrect and why A is correct
Current Student
Joined: 16 Oct 2019
Posts: 121
Own Kudos [?]: 35 [1]
Given Kudos: 896
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V36 (Online)
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V38
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet comple [#permalink]
1
Kudos
AcetheGMAT2019 wrote:
GMATNinja please help - I picked C over A. Please explain why C is incorrect and why A is correct

May be I can try and explain here.
Quote:
(C) The particular ways in which sensory experiences overlap in synesthesiacs follow a definite pattern.

This option says that the way in which sensory experiences overlap has a definite pattern. According to this it is strengthening the fact that there is indeed an overlap in the senses. But we need to weaken that there is no such overlap.
Quote:
(A) Synesthesiacs demonstrate a general, systematic impairment in their ability to use and understand words.

This says that he lost only the ability to use and understand words. Now due to this inability they are expressing the taste of banana as blue color. So it is their inability to express or understand words and not necessarily the overlap of senses.

Official Power Score thread - https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=3844

Hope it helps
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2019
Posts: 128
Own Kudos [?]: 91 [1]
Given Kudos: 171
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V36
Send PM
The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet comple [#permalink]
1
Kudos
AcetheGMAT2019 wrote:
GMATNinja please help - I picked C over A. Please explain why C is incorrect and why A is correct


The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet complementary. Each sense is thought to have its own range of stimuli that are incapable of stimulating the other senses. However, recent research has discovered that some people taste a banana and claim that they are tasting blue, or see a color and say that it has a specific smell. This shows that such people, called synesthesiacs, have senses that do not respect the usual boundaries between the five recognized senses.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Synesthesiacs demonstrate a general, systematic impairment in their ability to use and understand words.
(B) Recent evidence strongly suggests that there are other senses besides sight, touch, smell, hearing, and taste.
(C) The particular ways in which sensory experiences overlap in synesthesiacs follow a definite pattern.
(D) The synesthetic phenomenon has been described in the legends of various cultures.
(E) Synesthesiacs can be temporarily rid of their synesthetic experiences by the use of drugs.


A basically tells us that Synesthesiacs do not have senses that do not respect the usual boundaries between the five recognized senses but rather are just messing up the words as in Option A.

Option C tells us that there is an overlap, but an overlap still means that they have senses that do not respect the usual boundaries between the five recognized senses.
VP
VP
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Posts: 1262
Own Kudos [?]: 201 [0]
Given Kudos: 332
Send PM
Re: The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet comple [#permalink]
The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet complementary. Each sense is thought to have its own range of stimuli that are incapable of stimulating the other senses. However, recent research has discovered that some people taste a banana and claim that they are tasting blue, or see a color and say that it has a specific smell. This shows that such people, called synesthesiacs, have senses that do not respect the usual boundaries between the five recognized senses.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?


(A) Synesthesiacs demonstrate a general, systematic impairment in their ability to use and understand words.
-this is basically suggesting that synesthesiacs don't communicate well so their claims may be false
-CORRECT

(B) Recent evidence strongly suggests that there are other senses besides sight, touch, smell, hearing, and taste.
-let's suppose this is true, it doesn't necessarily weaken the idea that there is 'overlap' in the senses

(C) The particular ways in which sensory experiences overlap in synesthesiacs follow a definite pattern.
-strengthener

(D) The synesthetic phenomenon has been described in the legends of various cultures.
-strengthener

(E) Synesthesiacs can be temporarily rid of their synesthetic experiences by the use of drugs.
-strengthener
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2018
Posts: 268
Own Kudos [?]: 264 [0]
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Send PM
Re: The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet comple [#permalink]
sananoor wrote:
The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet complementary. Each sense is thought to have its own range of stimuli that are incapable of stimulating the other senses. However, recent research has discovered that some people taste a banana and claim that they are tasting blue, or see a color and say that it has a specific smell. This shows that such people, called synesthesiacs, have senses that do not respect the usual boundaries between the five recognized senses.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?



(A) Synesthesiacs demonstrate a general, systematic impairment in their ability to use and understand words.
- CORRECT. This shows that such people say such things due to some impairment, and not because they actually defy the usual boundaries of senses.

(B) Recent evidence strongly suggests that there are other senses besides sight, touch, smell, hearing, and taste.
- Irrelevant.

(C) The particular ways in which sensory experiences overlap in synesthesiacs follow a definite pattern.
- This tends to strengthen the argument in a way.

(D) The synesthetic phenomenon has been described in the legends of various cultures.
- This tends to strengthen the argument in a way.

(E) Synesthesiacs can be temporarily rid of their synesthetic experiences by the use of drugs.
Irrelevant.

Answer A.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2021
Posts: 338
Own Kudos [?]: 101 [0]
Given Kudos: 227
Send PM
Re: The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet comple [#permalink]
Between A and E. E has something important to say. If by using medications, they can get rid of the phenomenon, it clearly means their senses might still "respect the boundaries" but are under the influence of some cognitive impairment.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Nov 2020
Posts: 119
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [0]
Given Kudos: 96
Send PM
Re: The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet comple [#permalink]
This wasone of the easiest question to be completed under 1 min 30 sec the simple reason we have to figure out an option that givest he special ability in devising what they are doing other than the connection through sense bounda/ry therefore as option A suggests that it might be the way the demonstrates the words from where they are picking the clues hence imo A
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Posts: 374
Own Kudos [?]: 35 [0]
Given Kudos: 226
Send PM
The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet comple [#permalink]
I can’t well understand the OE, and this is my own understanding:
Narrow down to A and C as others are clearly irrelevant. Compare the two: as premise says Each sense is thought to have its own range of stimuli that are incapable of stimulating the other senses, C offers an explanation why synesthesiacs have senses that do not respect the usual boundaries between the five recognized senses——because in their senses there is an overlap of the five senses. So I think C is more like an assumption.

While A offers an alternative reason: it is not because synesthesiacs don’t respect the boundaries, but because they can’t express exactly by words. So A is a weakener.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17220
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet comple [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet comple [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne