Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 15:29 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 15:29

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 2876
Own Kudos [?]: 1649 [0]
Given Kudos: 781
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 707
Own Kudos [?]: 448 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 101
Own Kudos [?]: 384 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Italy
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 664
Own Kudos [?]: 213 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Since 1985, pollution levels in Lake Thomas have dropped [#permalink]
c. The water refinement process creates an environment extremely favorable to pike, a predator fish.


A. This is cause decling even with pollution.

B. No affect on the population "benign"

C. Predator thrives sunfish population declines... correct answer.

D. Out of scope

E. Out of scope.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 709
Own Kudos [?]: 783 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Since 1985, pollution levels in Lake Thomas have dropped [#permalink]
no doubt here about C

we need to find alternative reason for lower population of this sunfish, that is not directly related to cleaning the pollution of the lake, which is C
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 1490
Own Kudos [?]: 1133 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools:Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
 Q50  V34
Send PM
Re: Since 1985, pollution levels in Lake Thomas have dropped [#permalink]
I think its C.
User avatar
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 2876
Own Kudos [?]: 1649 [0]
Given Kudos: 781
Send PM
Re: Since 1985, pollution levels in Lake Thomas have dropped [#permalink]
Good Job.

Again, akamaibrah was gracious enough to explain:

"My choice is definitely C.

Remember, we are trying to explain the decrease in Sunfish...

(A) states that number of offspring is DIMINISHED by pollution. Hence, if we REDUCE pollution, offspring will no longer be diminished. This certainly does not explain the decrease in Sunfish -- more likely it inplies that an eventually increase will occur.

(B) states that the chemical do not harm fish. Hence, this does not explain the decrease in Sunfish.

(C) states that a predatory fish thrives in the environment created by the refinery. Nitpicking aside, since the subject of the argument is the "sunfish", it is reasonable to assume that the term "predatory" refers to the relationship of the pike to the sunfish. This would certanly explain a decrease in sunfish and IMO is the best choice.

(D). states that the heaviest concentration of pike are far away from the refinery. While this is consistent with (C), it does not in itself explain an overall decrease in the sunfish population.

(E) does nothing to explain the decrease in Sunfish since 1985 and is irrelavent. In fact, it removes a possible explaination for the decrease."
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 896
Own Kudos [?]: 593 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Since 1985, pollution levels in Lake Thomas have dropped [#permalink]
Clear winner C.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 26
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Hyderabad, India
Send PM
Re: Since 1985, pollution levels in Lake Thomas have dropped [#permalink]
I will also go with C.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 52
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: London
Send PM
Re: Since 1985, pollution levels in Lake Thomas have dropped [#permalink]
Could you give us the OA Praetorian.

I have a problem with C - it mentions 'creates an environment extremely favorable to pike' - this does not imply that pikes exist in the lake as well. All it says is that the environment is pike friendly.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 152
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Since 1985, pollution levels in Lake Thomas have dropped [#permalink]
C it is........
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 418
Own Kudos [?]: 48 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
 Q49  V41
Send PM
Re: Since 1985, pollution levels in Lake Thomas have dropped [#permalink]
C it is



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Since 1985, pollution levels in Lake Thomas have dropped [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne