Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 22:39 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 22:39

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 63 [7]
Given Kudos: 34
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618849 [2]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 63 [1]
Given Kudos: 34
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618849 [0]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: If p is a positive integer and 10p/96 is an integer [#permalink]
Expert Reply
irda wrote:
Bunuel,

Thanks. The logic behind the question is unacceptable per my chain of thoughts. I am definitely wrong as both your answer and the answer from the source match, but how can we state the value of unique prime numbers as the value of minimum prime numbers.

Does not minimum number of prime indicate the total number of prime numbers that must be in the numerator? The question does not say unique prime.

can you please help dispel my confusion. It is painful to override my flawed logic , if so.

8-) and thanks again


I see your point but usually the number of prime factors means the number of unique prime factors. For example, we say that 8 has one prime factor - 2, not three primes 2, 2, and 2. Though on the real test, I think, this would be explicitly stated.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 63 [2]
Given Kudos: 34
Send PM
Re: If p is a positive integer and 10p/96 is an integer [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Your assertion has such remedial effect to us novices. I must accept it is much more than just placebo. Thanks dude.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 109
Own Kudos [?]: 526 [0]
Given Kudos: 148
Send PM
Re: If p is a positive integer and 10p/96 is an integer [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
irda wrote:
If p is a positive integer and 10p/96 is an integer, then the minimum number of prime factors p could have is

(A) One
(B) Two
(C) Three
(D) Four
(E) Five


10p/96 = 5p/48.

The least positive value of p for which 5p/48 is an integer is 48 = 2^3*3. Hence the minimum number of prime factors p could have is two, namely 2 and 3.

Answer: B

Hope it's clear.


yeah, it is totally clear :-D
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 528
Own Kudos [?]: 194 [0]
Given Kudos: 275
Re: If p is a positive integer and 10p/96 is an integer [#permalink]
96= 2^5*3^1

(2*5*p)/2^5*3

Therefore p= 2^4*3^1 (At least)

Two prime factors.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Jul 2018
Posts: 27
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 200
Send PM
Re: If p is a positive integer and 10p/96 is an integer [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
irda wrote:
Bunuel,

Thanks. The logic behind the question is unacceptable per my chain of thoughts. I am definitely wrong as both your answer and the answer from the source match, but how can we state the value of unique prime numbers as the value of minimum prime numbers.

Does not minimum number of prime indicate the total number of prime numbers that must be in the numerator? The question does not say unique prime.

can you please help dispel my confusion. It is painful to override my flawed logic , if so.

8-) and thanks again


I see your point but usually the number of prime factors means the number of unique prime factors. For example, we say that 8 has one prime factor - 2, not three primes 2, 2, and 2. Though on the real test, I think, this would be explicitly stated.


Hi Bunuel, thanks for your answer!

So should we always consider "number of prime factors" as "nunber of unique primes"...? I am a bit confused as those2 terms are totally 2 different concepts.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618849 [0]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: If p is a positive integer and 10p/96 is an integer [#permalink]
Expert Reply
iac00 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
irda wrote:
Bunuel,

Thanks. The logic behind the question is unacceptable per my chain of thoughts. I am definitely wrong as both your answer and the answer from the source match, but how can we state the value of unique prime numbers as the value of minimum prime numbers.

Does not minimum number of prime indicate the total number of prime numbers that must be in the numerator? The question does not say unique prime.

can you please help dispel my confusion. It is painful to override my flawed logic , if so.

8-) and thanks again


I see your point but usually the number of prime factors means the number of unique prime factors. For example, we say that 8 has one prime factor - 2, not three primes 2, 2, and 2. Though on the real test, I think, this would be explicitly stated.


Hi Bunuel, thanks for your answer!

So should we always consider "number of prime factors" as "nunber of unique primes"...? I am a bit confused as those2 terms are totally 2 different concepts.


Yes. I think I answered this above.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Posts: 8019
Own Kudos [?]: 4096 [1]
Given Kudos: 242
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1:
545 Q79 V79 DI73
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: If p is a positive integer and 10p/96 is an integer [#permalink]
1
Kudos
irda wrote:
If p is a positive integer and 10p/96 is an integer, then the minimum number of prime factors p could have is

(A) One
(B) Two
(C) Three
(D) Four
(E) Five



10p/96
96= 2^ 5*3^1

or say
5p/48
or 5p/2^4 *3

so p has to have atleast 2 factors of 2 & 3 ; IMO B
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 18756
Own Kudos [?]: 22049 [0]
Given Kudos: 283
Location: United States (CA)
Send PM
Re: If p is a positive integer and 10p/96 is an integer [#permalink]
Expert Reply
irda wrote:
If p is a positive integer and 10p/96 is an integer, then the minimum number of prime factors p could have is

(A) One
(B) Two
(C) Three
(D) Four
(E) Five


Simplifying we have:

10p/96 = 5p/48

In order for 5p/48 to be an integer, then p must be a multiple of 48. Since 48 = 2^4 x 3, we see that the minimum number of prime factors of p is 2.

Answer: B
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32658
Own Kudos [?]: 821 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: If p is a positive integer and 10p/96 is an integer [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If p is a positive integer and 10p/96 is an integer [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92900 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne