Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 09:57 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 09:57

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13960
Own Kudos [?]: 32911 [13]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 451
Own Kudos [?]: 362 [0]
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Oct 2016
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 34
Location: India
Send PM
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 451
Own Kudos [?]: 362 [1]
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
Send PM
Re: I saw Barbara at the race track, and she told me that on the same hor [#permalink]
avinsethi wrote:
sobby wrote:
SajjadAhmad wrote:
I saw Barbara at the race track, and she told me that on the same horse race she made two win bets. She said she bet $10 on Boofer Bear to win at even money, and $5 on Copper Cane to win at odds of 10 to 1. After the race, she went back to the parimutuel window. So one or the other of those two horses must have won the race. Which of the following is NOT an unstated premise of the reasoning above?

(A) The only bets Barbara made on the race were her win bets on Boofer Bear and Copper Cane.
(B) In the race in question, Boofer Bear and Copper Cane did not finish in a dead heat.
(C) Barbara did not return to the parimutuel window after the race for some reason other than cashing a winning ticket.
(D) Barbara’s representation of the bets that she had placed was accurate.
(E) Barbara believed that it was more likely that Boofer Bear would win than Copper Cane.

Master GMAT


will go with C here..if she have gone to window for other reason the argument will not stand ...




I think the question stem wants to know which of the following is not an assumption. Since, (C) I feel is an assumption, it'd be incorrect. IMO (E).


yes ,missed the question stem ...thanks for highlighting
Tutor
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Posts: 113
Own Kudos [?]: 193 [0]
Given Kudos: 76
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Send PM
Re: I saw Barbara at the race track, and she told me that on the same hor [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Can you please explain the logic for picking E over B in this one?
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13960
Own Kudos [?]: 32911 [2]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: I saw Barbara at the race track, and she told me that on the same hor [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Official Explanation

Difficulty Level: 750

This question asks you to identify hidden assumptions embedded in the speaker’s argument. Examine each statement.

(A) is an assumption of the argument. Barbara told the speaker about two bets, and the speaker assumes those were the only two she made. (She could have made additional wagers.)

(B) is also an assumption of the argument. The speaker concludes that one or the other horse must have won, but that conclusion depends on the assumption that they did not both win.

(C) is also an assumption of the argument. The speaker implicitly assumes that the only reason Barbara would return to the parimutuel window is to cash a winning ticket, as opposed to placing another bet.

(D) is also a hidden assumption, similar to (A).

(E), however, is not an assumption. Barbara could very well have believed that Copper Cane was more likely to win—indeed, she stood to win more money with that result even though her bet was smaller because of the longer odds.

Answer: E


Hope it helps
GmatMinion wrote:
Can you please explain the logic for picking E over B in this one?
Tutor
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Posts: 113
Own Kudos [?]: 193 [0]
Given Kudos: 76
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Send PM
Re: I saw Barbara at the race track, and she told me that on the same hor [#permalink]
Expert Reply
SajjadAhmad wrote:
Official Explanation

Difficulty Level: 750

This question asks you to identify hidden assumptions embedded in the speaker’s argument. Examine each statement.

(A) is an assumption of the argument. Barbara told the speaker about two bets, and the speaker assumes those were the only two she made. (She could have made additional wagers.)

(B) is also an assumption of the argument. The speaker concludes that one or the other horse must have won, but that conclusion depends on the assumption that they did not both win.

(C) is also an assumption of the argument. The speaker implicitly assumes that the only reason Barbara would return to the parimutuel window is to cash a winning ticket, as opposed to placing another bet.

(D) is also a hidden assumption, similar to (A).

(E), however, is not an assumption. Barbara could very well have believed that Copper Cane was more likely to win—indeed, she stood to win more money with that result even though her bet was smaller because of the longer odds.

Answer: E


Hope it helps
GmatMinion wrote:
Can you please explain the logic for picking E over B in this one?


Thanks for the reply.

However, here are my questions:
B) Is it possible for two horses to win the same race?

My reason for picking B is:
The author is assuming that the two horses finish in a dead heat. Well, they can easily be the #first and the #last horses and Barbara would still make her money.

E) Barbara placed bets on both of them. Maybe she was playing safe on the horse she placed an 'even' bet on, just to recover her money safely and hence believed it to be the horse with a greater chance of winning. Whereas placing a bet with odds so high is more out of desperation (or belief) than calculated risk.
I mean, E can go either way but I feel B is a better pick.

Anyways, I appreciate your inputs!!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Jul 2021
Posts: 233
Own Kudos [?]: 48 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
Re: I saw Barbara at the race track, and she told me that on the same hor [#permalink]
I don't know the meaning of even money, dead heat and odds of 10 to 1. How am I supposed to understand the question and one of the options? Or am I missing something? Sajjad1994

Posted from my mobile device
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13960
Own Kudos [?]: 32911 [0]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: I saw Barbara at the race track, and she told me that on the same hor [#permalink]
Expert Reply
thakurarun85 wrote:
I don't know the meaning of even money, dead heat and odds of 10 to 1. How am I supposed to understand the question and one of the options? Or am I missing something? Sajjad1994

Posted from my mobile device


Knowing the exact meaning of the above said words is not directly related to answering the question correctly. Without knowing the exact meaning one can answer. One needs to have a good hand with logic and reasoning.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: I saw Barbara at the race track, and she told me that on the same hor [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne