DanTe02 wrote:
kagrawal16Quote:
Similarly in this question we have,
The modifier that modifies Lotte.
"Less successful after she emigrated to New York than she had been in .., Lotte...
Than she had been in Germany (clause) is parallel to modifier "less successful after she emigrated"
In essence
She had been in Germany (clause 1)
She was less successful after she emigrated to NewYork (Clause 2)
But clause 2 is a modifier.
I am no where near legendary as the people you've tagged but here are my thoughts
First comparisons are not much of a rule like you mentioned
You just need clear understanding
I like pizza more than burger ( Sure you might say this is a okay comparison as noun is being compared btw the comparison is actually okay here )
But what about this one
I like cheese more than yvette (Now its incorrect because its not common knowledge to know if yvetter is a person or an ingredient. If its a person it should be I like cheese more than yvette does if you want to say you like cheese more than something, it could be made clearer by saying I like cheese more than I like yvette
Also what do you mean by
Quote:
She had been in Germany (clause 1)
She was less successful after she emigrated to NewYork (Clause 2)
But clause 2 is a modifier.
Kudos if you found it helpful
Hey,
Comparisons ought to be parallel right. A clause parallel to a clause in comparison.
What i meant is
Less Successful after she emigrated to NY. <- this is an adjective
Than she had been in Germany. <- This is a clause.
Please note in the above,
She had been in germany is not parallel to she emigrated to NY.
It is rather parallel to She "was" less successful after she emigrated to NY.
Eg.
She was successful in NY
She had been successful in Germany. Successful is ellided.
But the former is less than the latter.
But the was is not there as Less successful is a modifier.
Well for a similar question letters to Mark Twain, this is an issue highlighted by a moderator.
I am all for meaning, understanding and being flexible to pick the "best" option.
But I guess I figured the answer to my question last night.
Less successful after she emigrated to NewYork than "when" she had been in Germany is a better comparison.
In this case
"when" she had been in Germany
IS PARALLEL TO
after she emigrated to NewYork
"she had been in Germany" <- no ellipsis. Just a case of presence in Germany.
"she emigrated to NY" <- presence in NY.
This IMO is a better comparison for the case. But we chose from the available options and no doubt the correct answer is the best available option.
I can quote Manhattan too
. But application is a different picture and well learning from experts is the real learning in that case
.
Though let me know if you found what i wrote to make sense.