Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 07:30 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 07:30

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4380
Own Kudos [?]: 32867 [11]
Given Kudos: 4453
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Posts: 2101
Own Kudos [?]: 8808 [7]
Given Kudos: 171
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Apr 2018
Posts: 27
Own Kudos [?]: 16 [3]
Given Kudos: 45
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
Send PM
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4380
Own Kudos [?]: 32867 [3]
Given Kudos: 4453
Send PM
Re: The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in the univer [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Top Contributor
It is only because of the enormous interstellar distances that so little material per unit of volume becomes so significant.

(C) stars can be far enough from Earth to be obscured even by very sparsely distributed matter

What is sparsely, which means NOT so dense, to a long-distance the become significant in obscuring the stars

(A) little of the interstellar material in it seems substantial

It is not the same paraphrasing. Moreover, in C we talk about the matter + other material = Interstellar Material.

In A , on the other hand, we care about ONLY of matter

Hope is now more clear to you. The passage is short but nasty

Regards
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13957
Own Kudos [?]: 32869 [0]
Given Kudos: 5775
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in the univer [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Bumping up for more discussion.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Jun 2019
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 89
Location: India
GRE 1: Q165 V164
Send PM
Re: The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in the univer [#permalink]
greenisthecolor wrote:
carcass wrote:
3. It can be inferred from the passage that it is because space is so vast that

(A) little of the interstellar material in it seems substantial
(B) normal units of volume seem futile for measurements of density
(C) stars can be far enough from Earth to be obscured even by very sparsely distributed matter
(D) interstellar gases can, for all practical purposes, be regarded as transparent
(E) optical astronomy would be of little use even if no interstellar dust existed

Could someone tell me what is wrong in option A?

I chose A as it resembled the 2nd last sentence in the passage.
carcass wrote:
It is only because of the enormous interstellar distances that so little material per unit of volume becomes so significant.


Supporting details for Option C:

1. The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in the universe that are devoid of stars as had long been thought. Rather, they are dark because of interstellar dust that hides the stars behind it.
2. Dust accounts for about one percent of the total mass of interstellar matter.

Option A is incorrect because despite the avg. low density of interstellar material, interstellar material has a substantial effect as it can hide the stars behind it.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Mar 2015
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 90
Send PM
Re: The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in the univer [#permalink]
Can someone explain the second question? Why is C wrong and how do I interpret that density is not homogenous throughout interstellar space. (From which part of the passage I should be deriving this inference)

2. It can be inferred from the passage that the density of interstellar material is

(A) higher where distances between the stars are shorter
(B) equal to that of interstellar dust
(C) unusually low in the vicinity of our Sun
(D) independent of the incidence of gaseous components
(E) not homogeneous throughout interstellar space
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Posts: 792
Own Kudos [?]: 683 [0]
Given Kudos: 1316
Location: India
Send PM
Re: The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in the univer [#permalink]
Spunk17 wrote:
Can someone explain the second question? Why is C wrong and how do I interpret that density is not homogenous throughout interstellar space. (From which part of the passage I should be deriving this inference)

2. It can be inferred from the passage that the density of interstellar material is

(A) higher where distances between the stars are shorter
(B) equal to that of interstellar dust
(C) unusually low in the vicinity of our Sun
(D) independent of the incidence of gaseous components
(E) not homogeneous throughout interstellar space


Hi Spunk17,

E can be inferred from the lines: "The average density of interstellar material in the vicinity of our Sun is 1,000 to 10,000 times less than the best terrestrial laboratory vacuum. Average density implies that density is not homogeneous.
Same lines tell us that C is incorrect, as the option talks about the density, and what's mentioned in the passage is average density. Also, the average density in the of interstellar material in the vicinity of the Sun is less when compared to the best terrestrial laboratory vacuum. But what is option C based on? We cannot infer with certainty that the density would be "unusually low" in the vicinity of our Sun.


Hope This Helps.
Thanks.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 May 2021
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 13
Send PM
The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in the univer [#permalink]
2. It can be inferred from the passage that the density of interstellar material is

(A) higher where distances between the stars are shorter
(B) equal to that of interstellar dust
(C) unusually low in the vicinity of our Sun
(D) independent of the incidence of gaseous components
(E) not homogeneous throughout interstellar space

Given, interstellar material has low avg. density because of enormous distance. So, density will be higher when distance are shorter. So I selected Option A. Someone pls explain?
GMAT Club Bot
The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in the univer [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13957 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne