Hello Everyone!
Let's tackle this question, one thing at a time, and narrow down our options quickly so we know how to answer questions like this when they pop up on the GMAT! To begin, let's take a quick look at the question and highlight any major differences between the options in
orange:
Sophisticated laser-guided land graders can now flatten uneven farmland almost perfectly
so as not to waste rainwater in runoff down sloping fields.
(A)
so as not to waste rainwater
(B)
so that rainwater
is not wasted(C)
so that there is no wasted rainwater
(D)
and thereby not waste rainwater
(E)
and there is no rainwater
wastedSo...this is going to be a tricky one!
There is no clear "either/or" split to start with here, so we need to look at bigger grammatical concepts, such as meaning, wordiness, and logic. We need to make sure that we don't pair the inanimate object (land graders) with any actions it cannot do, and we also need to make sure we don't change/ruin the intended meaning. To make problems easier to spot, let's add in the non-underlined portions.
Sophisticated laser-guided land graders can now flatten uneven farmland almost perfectly so as not to waste rainwater in runoff down sloping fields.
(A) Sophisticated laser-guided land graders can now flatten uneven farmland almost perfectly
so as not to waste rainwater in runoff down sloping fields.
This is
INCORRECT because it changes the intended meaning. This sentence suggests that the land graders
were initially the reason why rainwater was wasted, and that if they don't flatten the farmland perfectly, they might cause it again. This isn't the meaning we're going for here. We want the sentence to convey that the land graders flatten the land, and that flattening prevents rainwater getting wasted in the runoff. We need to find an option that better conveys the intended meaning.
(B) Sophisticated laser-guided land graders can now flatten uneven farmland almost perfectly
so that rainwater is not wasted in runoff down sloping fields.
This is our
CORRECT choice. The cause-effect relationship is clearly stated, and it's not overly wordy.
(C) Sophisticated laser-guided land graders can now flatten uneven farmland almost perfectly
so that there is no wasted rainwater in runoff down sloping fields.
This is
INCORRECT because it's overly wordy. The phrase "there is no wasted rainwater" isn't necessary when the passive form "rainwater is not wasted" is shorter and even clearer to readers.
(D) Sophisticated laser-guided land graders can now flatten uneven farmland almost perfectly
and thereby not waste rainwater in runoff down sloping fields.
This is
INCORRECT for the same reason as option A. It suggests that the land graders are causing the water waste when they don't perform properly, which isn't the meaning we're looking for.
(E) Sophisticated laser-guided land graders can now flatten uneven farmland almost perfectly
and there is no rainwater wasted in runoff down sloping fields.
This is
INCORRECT for two reasons. First, the word "and" takes away the cause-effect relationship between the land grader flattening land and preventing wasted rainwater. Second, it has the same wordiness problem as option C with the phrase "there is no rainwater wasted."
There you have it - option B is the correct choice because the meaning is clear and the wording is concise!
Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
_________________
EMPOWERgmat
Total GMAT Content & Tactical Training | 120 Point Guarantee | All 6 Official GMAT Tests
empowergmat.com