Thank you for sharing further! I think it's great to receive so much support and interest from the school during your application! Again, not sure what percentage of domestic vs international students have received these calls and invites, but as an international applicant myself, I would have rather loved to have it than not. Not just for any possible competitive advantage, but just to get a closer and more 'physical' feel of the school I would love to attend!
And I do hope that you're in pool #1 that I mentioned above, and good luck with the results!
MBAApplicant93 wrote:
variantguy wrote:
I do also think that this could be an effort to improve yield, but I can't seem to figure out the reasoning behind who they are choosing to call/connect with resources.
1. They could be targeting applicants they think have already demonstrated a high genuine intent to join Kellogg, in order to solidify those admit conversations(with the rest of their application and candidature obviously meeting the standards). In which case, if you're in that pool things look good for you.
2. They could be doing this with candidates that they want to admit badly, but who they know might receive other admits or may not have shown as much of an intent during the interactions. This implies there would be another bunch of applicants with equally good credentials and a higher demonstrated intent, and so these non-evaluative calls could actually be a two-way further interaction, but they may or not end up being convinced about successfully admitting such applicants. In such a scenario, I don't think being in this pool necessarily puts one at an advantage.
Whichever way this swings, we'll get to know in about 20 days.
Posted from my mobile device
Well said! To give more perspective on my extremely large sample size, of two prospective students, my friend and I both went on Kellogg visits before interviews and interviewed on-campus. We both have received phone calls from admissions and have been paired with current students (from other admissions folks) as well. But back to your points #1 and #2, you could make an argument that we could still fall in either bucket, which I agree that being in bucket #2 doesn't put anyone at an advantage, and may actually be a disadvantage. Again, just my thoughts.