Quote:
2. Which of the following statements, if true, would support the assertion that Finnish was “important to [Finland’s] burgeoning national identity” (Highlighted)?
Quote:
This tongue is not endangered, even though Finland was ruled from the Middle Ages until 1917 by first Sweden and then Russia and, during this period, Swedish was used as the language of administration and government. In 1919, a newly independent Finland constitutionally adopted both Finnish and Swedish as official languages, legally recognizing its native language as important to its burgeoning national identity. As of 2013, Finnish was spoken by 89 percent of the population of Finland.
Quote:
(A) Speaking Finnish after 1919 became a point of pride for those in Finland, whereas it previously had often been a source of shame.
If people those who considered the language as source of shame, now considered it a point of pride. It definitely support the assertion that it happened because language was important to its burgeoning national identity Quote:
(B) Both Swedish and Finnish were taught in Finnish schools after 1919, just as they had been before the new constitution was adopted.
First of all , until 1917 ,Finnish was the key language for government and administration. After 1917 , things were changed. So Finnish language had more role to play .
Its not supporting the assertion if Finnish was “just as they had been before the new constitution was adopted.”- reject
2nd reason: we have no information about languages in schools. It may be Finnish was not at all taught in schools.-
So have strong reasons to reject B option.
Quote:
(C) Finland adopted a new flag and national anthem after the new constitution was approved in 1919.
Nothing is mentioned about whether Finland adopted a new flag or anther-wrong
Adopting new anthem or new flag doesn’t help in supporting that more people start speaking Finnish .
Quote:
(D) Some people in Finland continued to use Swedish as their preferred language even after Finnish was adopted as an official language.
It would not support the assertion about Finnish important to burgeoning national identity. – not a good answer
Quote:
(E) Those who worked to modernize Finnish in the late nineteenth century so it would achieve broader acceptance favored the western dialect over the eastern.
We are looking for some option that can add weightage that Finnish was “important to [Finland’s] burgeoning national identity”
Achieving broader acceptance favored the western dialect over the eastern doesn’t help to differntiate that it would add more people who would speak Finnish. -reject