VeritasKarishma wrote:
jabhatta@umail.iu.edu wrote:
Question - what is the conclusion of this agreement ?
Is it that "mathematicians clearly form a tightly knit community"
My understanding is it is one word "clearly" that makes this statement the conclusion of this argument but wanted to know your thoughts
...............
Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recognized to have solved the Hilbert Conjecture. Ghosh posted his work on the internet,rather than submitting it to established journals. In fact, he has no job, let alone a university position; he lives alone and has refused all acclaim. In reporting on Ghosh, the press unfortunately has reinforced the popular view that mathematicians are antisocial loners. But mathematicians clearly form a tightly knit community,frequently collaborating on important efforts; indeed, teams of researchers are working together to extend Ghosh's findings.
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following
roles?
(A) The first is an observation the author makes to illustrate a social pattern; the second is a generalization of that pattern.
(B) The first is evidence in favor of the popular view expressed in the argument;the second is a brief restatement of that view.
(C) The first is a specific example of a generalization that the author contradicts;the second is a reiteration of that generalization.
(D) The first is a specific counterexample to a generalization that the author asserts;the second is that generalization.
(E) The first is a judgment that counters the primary assertion expressed in the argument; the second is a circumstance on which that judgment is based
Posted from my mobile device
Even without "clearly", the conclusion will be "mathematicians form a tightly knit community".
Look, the conclusion is the reason the author wrote the argument. If you need to sum everything that the author wants to say in one sentence, the conclusion will be that sentence.
An example of Zubin Ghosh is given and then the other view is given - that mathematicians are antisocial loners
Then the author gives his view - mathematicians clearly form a tightly knit community
and then gives his reasoning - frequently collaborating on important efforts; indeed, teams of researchers are working together to extend Ghosh's findings.
His view is why he wrote the argument.
Hi Karishma
Thank you so much for responding -- Just a follow-up
If I were to speak in daily conversation with an analogy
Analogy to arguement --
IT professionals are loners. In fact, a study showed they only have 10 friends
But
they live in tight knit communities, playing sports and eating together everyday
-- I don't think it would be accurate to say the bold was the conclusion of the argement
I would think the conclusion is unwritten actually .. The conclusion I think should be..
Unwritten conclusion : The claim that "IT professionals are loners" is false
Premise : the bold and everything there- after are actually premises to this unwritten conclusion
Just trying to reconcile with language spoken everyday