Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 05:41 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 05:41

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1115
Own Kudos [?]: 2163 [1]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 162
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Economics
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
CEO
CEO
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 3675
Own Kudos [?]: 3528 [0]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Send PM
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4347
Own Kudos [?]: 30791 [2]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orb [#permalink]
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Rumsus wrote:
Isn't as used for Comparisons ? If so, then here i am unable to find any comparison. Why is as used in correct answer choice then ? Can anyone please explain ?



Hello Rumsus,


The word as has many functions. It is used to present

1. Comparison (as you correctly mentioned).
2. Reason (as a synonymous for "because").
3. Function/role of a noun entity.
4. Simultaneity between two actions.
5. some information about an action ("as" acts as an adverb)

This official sentence uses as to present simultaneity between two actions - increase in the chances collision along with the increase in the amount of debris and in the number of satellites. This meaning fits perfectly in the context of the sentence.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Jun 2019
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 25
Send PM
Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orb [#permalink]
Hi Verbal Experts,
In options A & C, isn't "amount" singular and thus should have "continues" as the verb instead of continue.
Please clarify this
Thanks
CEO
CEO
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 3675
Own Kudos [?]: 3528 [0]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Send PM
Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orb [#permalink]
Expert Reply
darkknight016 wrote:
Hi Verbal Experts,
In options A & C, isn't "amount" singular and thus should have "continues" as the verb instead of continue.

There are two things:

i) the amount of space debris and
ii) the number of satellites
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 May 2018
Posts: 98
Own Kudos [?]: 74 [0]
Given Kudos: 75
Send PM
Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orb [#permalink]
scheol79 wrote:
Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orbit around the Earth, and the chances of a collision involving such material increase greatly as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise.


(A) as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise

(B) as the rise continues in both the amount of satellites and space debris

(C) as the amount of space debris and the number of satellites continue to rise

(D) with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites

(E) with the amount of space debris continuing to increase along with the number of satellites


(A) as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise - Countable satellites so amount cant refer to satellites.

(B) as the rise continues in both the amount of satellites and space debris - Space debris should have amount and Satellites should have number.

(C) as the amount of space debris and the number of satellites continue to rise - Seems about right.

(D) with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites - the list is parallel after "the" - So, continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites are parallel. here, the number of satellites should increase but they do not as continually increasing is not referring to the number of satellites.

(E) with the amount of space debris continuing to increase along with the number of satellites - Along with usually makes one subject primary. Here, along with makes space debris primary whereas in original sentence, the Space debris and number of satellites are equal in importance.

This is what my explanation is. I am trying to find the usages of with which i can refer to. Does anybody has any idea regarding that?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Jun 2021
Posts: 43
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Send PM
Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orb [#permalink]
isn't "the number of " singluar?
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 778
Own Kudos [?]: 396 [1]
Given Kudos: 2198
Send PM
Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orb [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
with+noun can modify a preceding noun or preceding verb.
comma+with+noun can modify the preceding clause.

the girl with red hair is my friend. "with phrase" modify a noun
I work with a good spirit. "with phrase modify preceding verb
I work hard, with my friends going out for change. "with phrase" modify the preceding clause

in choice D and E, there is no comma, so, "with -phrase" can not modify the preceding clause and must modify the preceding noun. but this phrase is not logical to modify the preceding noun. Wrong
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2021
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 50 [0]
Given Kudos: 259
Send PM
Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orb [#permalink]
I have heard that '' A number of '' demands plural verb, whereas ''The number of'' demands singular verb. I thought OA has a plural verb ''continue'' to describe ''the number of satellites'', thus I eliminated the option. Shouldn't it be ''continues''?

Or is it that the verb depends on the subject following the ''number'' as in the OA : ''satellites'' is countable, so plural? (I know this rule works for percent scenarios eg: ''percent of'') Does this rule apply even for ''number of''?

Experts, please clarify

Regards
Vighnesh
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orb [#permalink]
Expert Reply
VIGHNESHKAMATH wrote:
I have heard that '' A number of '' demands plural verb, whereas ''The number of'' demands singular verb. I thought OA has a plural verb ''continue'' to describe ''the number of satellites'', thus I eliminated the option. Shouldn't it be ''continues''?

Or is it that the verb depends on the subject following the ''number'' as in the OA : ''satellites'' is countable, so plural? (I know this rule works for percent scenarios eg: ''percent of'') Does this rule apply even for ''number of''?

Experts, please clarify

Regards
Vighnesh


Hello VIGHNESHKAMATH,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, the plural verb "continue" is needed here because the verb refers to the plural noun phrase "the amount of space debris and the number of satellites"; the meaning conveyed here is that both the amount of space debris and the number of satellites are rising.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Mar 2022
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: India
Send PM
Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orb [#permalink]
Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orbit around the Earth, and the chances of a collision involving such material increase greatly as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise.


(A) as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise

(B) as the rise continues in both the amount of satellites and space debris

(C) as the amount of space debris and the number of satellites continue to rise

(D) with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites

(E) with the amount of space debris continuing to increase along with the number of satellites


In Option D, Can't we say that

with the continually increasing -

1. amount of space (Noun phrase1)
&
2. the number of satellites
(Noun Phrase 2 , common part-with the continually increasing)

GMATNinja Could you please assist!
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6920
Own Kudos [?]: 63665 [1]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orb [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Pathshala wrote:
{...}

In Option D, Can't we say that

with the continually increasing -

1. amount of space (Noun phrase1)
&
2. the number of satellites
(Noun Phrase 2 , common part-with the continually increasing)

GMATNinja Could you please assist!

Yes, you could interpret it that way, and the sentence would make sense. But the reader is forced to make a decision, and as a result the intended meaning isn't immediately clear.

A natural reaction is to start the parallel list after the "with": "... with (1) the continually increasing amount of space debris and (2) the number of satellites." The reader then has to think, "Wait, that doesn't make sense -- how can I make this work?". (C) eliminates that bit of confusion, making it a better sentence.

Also, what does it mean to say that the chances of a collision increase greatly WITH the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites? The "as" in choice (C) is a bit more precise (X increases as Y & Z increase).

(D) isn't terrible, but (C) is a better option.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17221
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orb [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orb [#permalink]
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne