Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 00:27 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 00:27

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 5330
Own Kudos [?]: 35486 [5]
Given Kudos: 9464
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 5330
Own Kudos [?]: 35486 [6]
Given Kudos: 9464
Send PM
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Aug 2017
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [2]
Given Kudos: 118
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2019
Posts: 829
Own Kudos [?]: 888 [1]
Given Kudos: 354
Location: Poland
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V27
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 3: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Consumer Electronics)
Send PM
Re: The philosophical doctrine of Incompatibility posits an inherent irrec [#permalink]
1
Kudos
generis wrote:

Project SC Butler: Day 204: Sentence Correction (SC2)


For SC butler Questions Click Here


The philosophical doctrine of Incompatibility posits an inherent irreconcilability among the doctrine of Determinism, which holds that each state of affairs is necessitated by the states of affairs that preceded it, and the existence of free will.


A) among the doctrine of Determinism, which holds that each state of affairs is necessitated by the states of affairs that preceded it, and the existence of free will

B) between the doctrine of Determinism, holding each state of affairs as necessitated by the states of affairs that preceded it, and free will existing

C) in the doctrine of Determinism, which holds the idea that each state of affairs is necessitated by the states of affairs preceding, and the existence of free will

D) between the doctrine of Determinism, which holds that each state of affairs is necessitated by the states of affairs preceding it, and the existence of free will

E) between the doctrine of Determinism, which holds that each state of affairs may be necessitated by the states of affairs preceding it, and free will existing


There are no 2 elements thus the usage of between is incorrect - B, D and E out

In C "in the doctrine of Determinism, which holds the idea" we need "that" after holds as doctrine of Determinism doesn't hold the idea by itself. It needs a definition of what it holds i.e. holds that blah blah blah..

Answer - A
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 May 2019
Posts: 785
Own Kudos [?]: 1040 [2]
Given Kudos: 101
Send PM
Re: The philosophical doctrine of Incompatibility posits an inherent irrec [#permalink]
2
Kudos
D is the best answer.

Meaning: The doctrine posits an irreconcilability between: X: the doctrine of determinism and Y: the existence of free will.

Split #1: between and among
The sentence talks about irreconcilability between/among two thing, X: the doctrine of determinism and Y: the existence of free will. When reference is made to two things, between is appropriate and among is inappropriate. Based on this, A can be eliminated.

Split #2: Parallelism: the doctrine of Determinism and the existence of free will vs the doctrine of Determinism and free will existing
If my understanding of the structure is right, then in free will existing, the modifier is free will and the noun is existing, forming an appositive phrase. If strict parallelism rules are applied, then free will existing is not parallel to the doctrine of Determination. However, the doctrine and the existence are parallel. The noun form existence is superior to the gerund existing. In addition, the simple gerund can only be made parallel to another simple gerund. Based on this B and E can be eliminated.

Between C and D, C states that the doctrine of Determinism holds the idea that each state of affairs is necessitated by the states of affairs preceding. First of all, it is illogical for a doctrine to hold an idea. A person can hold an idea in a doctrine but it makes no sense to say a doctrine holds an idea. Second, the pronoun it is omitted in C after preceding, hence C creates a sense of an incomplete though in the which clause.

The philosophical doctrine of Incompatibility posits an inherent irreconcilability among the doctrine of Determinism, which holds that each state of affairs is necessitated by the states of affairs that preceded it, and the existence of free will.

A) among the doctrine of Determinism, which holds that each state of affairs is necessitated by the states of affairs that preceded it, and the existence of free will

B) between the doctrine of Determinism, holding each state of affairs as necessitated by the states of affairs that preceded it, and free will existing

C) in the doctrine of Determinism, which holds the idea that each state of affairs is necessitated by the states of affairs preceding [it], and the existence of free will

D) between the doctrine of Determinism, which holds that each state of affairs is necessitated by the states of affairs preceding it, and the existence of free will

E) between the doctrine of Determinism, which holds that each state of affairs may be necessitated by the states of affairs preceding it, and free will existing
McDonough School Moderator
Joined: 04 Jun 2019
Posts: 156
Own Kudos [?]: 142 [1]
Given Kudos: 102
Location: Mongolia
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT Date: 08-28-2021
GRE 1: Q165 V153

GRE 2: Q167 V151
GPA: 3.7
WE:Securities Sales and Trading (Retail Banking)
Send PM
Re: The philosophical doctrine of Incompatibility posits an inherent irrec [#permalink]
1
Kudos
among is used more than 2 items VS between is used 2 items, items that are the doctrine of Determinism and the existence of free will. So A is out. C is also out, taking preposition changes the meaning.
free will existing sounds awkward. mean noun is existing and free will is modifies the noun existing. existence of free will is better and correct. relationship between existence and free will is correctly stated. So B and E are out.
D corrects all of the above misses, hence D is right.
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 5330
Own Kudos [?]: 35486 [0]
Given Kudos: 9464
Send PM
Re: The philosophical doctrine of Incompatibility posits an inherent irrec [#permalink]
Expert Reply
The official explanation is here.
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: The philosophical doctrine of Incompatibility posits an inherent irrec [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Dear Friends,

Here is a detailed explanation to this question-

generis wrote:

The philosophical doctrine of Incompatibility posits an inherent irreconcilability among the doctrine of Determinism, which holds that each state of affairs is necessitated by the states of affairs that preceded it, and the existence of free will.


A) among the doctrine of Determinism, which holds that each state of affairs is necessitated by the states of affairs that preceded it, and the existence of free will

B) between the doctrine of Determinism, holding each state of affairs as necessitated by the states of affairs that preceded it, and free will existing

C) in the doctrine of Determinism, which holds the idea that each state of affairs is necessitated by the states of affairs preceding, and the existence of free will

D) between the doctrine of Determinism, which holds that each state of affairs is necessitated by the states of affairs preceding it, and the existence of free will

E) between the doctrine of Determinism, which holds that each state of affairs may be necessitated by the states of affairs preceding it, and free will existing


A: This answer choice incorrectly uses the word "among" to compare two nouns, "doctrine" and "existence"; "among" is only used when comparing three or more elements. Thus, this answer choice is incorrect.

B: This answer choice is awkward, as it compares the dedicated noun "doctrine" with the gerund "existing". Additionally, B is redundant due to its use of the needlessly wordy phrase "holding each state of affairs as necessitated by the states of affairs that preceded it". Thus, this answer choice is incorrect.

C: This answer choice fails to maintain the proper idiom construction "between...and" when comparing two elements. Additionally, C suffers from a subtle error in meaning because it uses the phrase "which holds the idea"; this phrasing implies that the doctrine has an idea, and is thus capable of conscious thought. Thus, this answer choice is incorrect.

D: This answer choice is concise, maintains proper comparison and idiom construction, and conveys the intended meaning of the sentence; namely, according to the philosophical doctrine of Incompatibility, the doctrine of Determinism and the existence of free will are irreconcilable. Thus, this answer choice is correct.

E: This answer choice changes the meaning of the sentence by using the phrase "may be", which conveys a sense of ambiguity. E also repeats the comparison error seen in Option B. Thus, this answer choice is incorrect.

Hence, D is the best answer choice.

To understand the concept of "Between v/s Among on GMAT", you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):



All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17215
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The philosophical doctrine of Incompatibility posits an inherent irrec [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The philosophical doctrine of Incompatibility posits an inherent irrec [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne