Recent research shows that hesitation, shifting posture, and failure to maintain eye contact are not reliable indicators in discriminating between those who are lying and those who are telling the truth. The research indicates that behavior that cannot be controlled is a much better clue, at least when the lie is important to the liar. Such behavior includes the dilation of eye pupils, which indicates emotional arousal, and small movements of facial muscles, which indicate distress, fear or anger.
Which one of the following provides the strongest reason for exercising caution when relying on the “better” clues mentioned above in order to discover whether someone is lying?
The word 'caution' requires us to find a weakener of the argument.
(A) A person who is lying might be aware that he or she is being closely observed for indications of lying. - WRONG. Whether this option is true or not it doesn't lay any role is exercising caution.
(B) Someone who is telling the truth might nevertheless have a past history of lying. - WRONG. May be true then what.?? Not concerned with his/her past.
(C) A practiced liar might have achieved great control over body posture and eye contact. - CORRECT. Someone relying on these indicators might be mislead by practiced liar in believing liar's cause.
(D) A person telling the truth might be affected emotionally by being suspected of lying or by some other aspect of the situation. - WRONG. This takes the exactly the opposite direction to we are looking for. Its \(180/deg/\) to option C.
(E) Someone who is lying might exhibit hesitation and shifting posture as well as dilated pupils. - WRONG. Strengthens the argument, opposite to what is asked for.
IMO Answer C.
_________________
Pain + Reflection = Progress | Ray Dalio
Good Books to read prior to MBA