erlandgas wrote:
If I had to guess, they might be fillers for the team based interview. There are a lot of slots for team interviews. Maybe 30 if I remember right. If they need 4 or 5 per slot, then that's a lot of people to fill in for a round that typically has very few applicants. Also, if the visa issues deters a lot of internationals from attending, then they could possibly WL those with below average class stats and take them off if needed.
OK, a few hours later it is surprising how few dings have still been reported. "Filler" interview invites don't really make sense to me - they're experienced at this enough to not need crash test dummies for comparison, and they can always hold more or fewer interview sessions - but I think you have to be right that a lot of candidates who might ordinarily be rejected will get WL’d as a hedge... if Harvard came out and said they’re running a deeper WL than normal, MIT is openly reconsidering applicants they rejected in earlier rounds, and Wharton was among many schools extending their R3 application deadline, adcoms must be working in their own ways to manage for potentially much greater melt than normal. Schools still need to make sure they build a balanced class while protecting their stats, and it makes sense that lower statistical profiles that bring other things to the table could be more useful than normal to have on the bench until very late in the game. I do think this all bodes well for (rather than being a slight to) people who are already on the waitlist, though. Guess we’ll know more in a few short weeks...