Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden : Admitted

G

FinanceMan

Masters of Science Forum Moderator

Joined: 24 Feb 2020

Posts: 249

Own Kudos [?]: 149 [0]

Given Kudos: 113

Location: United States (OK)

Schools: Fuqua MSQM-BA Online "22 (M)

Send PM

Re: Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

31 Mar 2020, 15:24

Darden

Posted from my mobile device

L

bb

Founder

Joined: 04 Dec 2002

Posts: 37305

Own Kudos [?]: 72873 [0]

Given Kudos: 18863

Location: United States (WA)

GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42

GPA: 3

Send PM

Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

31 Mar 2020, 15:46

Expert Reply

abhimahna - any thoughts? Thank you!

Posted from my mobile device

L

abhimahna

Board of Directors

Joined: 18 Jul 2015

Status:Emory Goizueta Alum

Posts: 3600

Own Kudos [?]: 5425 [3]

Given Kudos: 346

Send PM

Re: Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

31 Mar 2020, 15:47

3

Kudos

Expert Reply

Hey CTom ,

Congratulations for amazing admits. I am a current MBA 2nd year student at Emory. I think Emory makes much more sense here for following reasons:

1. Emory has a very strong financial recruitment process. Finance club puts alot of efforts to help you throughout the recruitment process. In addition, real estate opportunities have also started growing. A couple of my classmates are going to real estate this year.
2. Zero debt. I think it's better to put your whole efforts and mind into recruiting for what you want rather than having a big debt at the back of your head.
3. Emory is also heavily based on case study methods. Infact, our professors are either the CEO of some firms or have worked on MBBs for 15-20 years.

The only disadvantage I can think of for you is you might need to travel to New York every Friday for your networking chats.

Good luck and let me know if you have any questions.

L

bb

Founder

Joined: 04 Dec 2002

Posts: 37305

Own Kudos [?]: 72873 [3]

Given Kudos: 18863

Location: United States (WA)

GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42

GPA: 3

Send PM

Re: Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

31 Mar 2020, 15:48

2

Kudos

Expert Reply

Wow... he is instant!

Posted from my mobile device

B

CTom

Intern

Joined: 31 Mar 2020

Posts: 4

Own Kudos [?]: 3 [1]

Given Kudos: 0

Schools: Goizueta '22 (A$) Darden '22 (A) Kenan-Flagler '22 (A$)

Send PM

Re: Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

01 Apr 2020, 07:26

1

Kudos

Thanks for the replies.

For those who believe Darden may be the best option in the scenario, even considering the additional amount of debt that would be taken, could you please elaborate on the trade-offs?

It seems that some have voted for Kenan-Flagler but have not shared any opinion of why they would vote this way. If anyone cares to give their opinion on Kenan-Flagler, as well, it would also be appreciated.

B

BradyMVP

Manager

Joined: 16 Jan 2020

Posts: 77

Own Kudos [?]: 21 [0]

Given Kudos: 38

Location: United States

Schools: Duke '22 (M$)

GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38

GPA: 3.9

WE:Investment Banking (Other)

Send PM

Re: Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

01 Apr 2020, 08:22

I don’t mean to sound rude when I state this but you’re making an investment on your future. One of these schools is light years ahead of the other two in your desired field. What’s 100-150k over the course of the next twenty years of your career?

Emory and Kenan Flagler are fine schools. But Darden is a slight notch ahead

Posted from my mobile device

G

woody93

Manager

Joined: 27 Sep 2016

Posts: 121

Own Kudos [?]: 108 [4]

Given Kudos: 11

Concentration: General Management, Strategy

Schools: Kenan-Flagler '21 (M) Goizueta '21 (A) Owen '21 (WD) McDonough '21 (A) Ross '21 (WD) McCombs '24 Tepper '24

GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V53

GRE 1: Q160 V160

Re: Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

01 Apr 2020, 08:54

4

Kudos

Hey I am a current 1st year at UNC Kenan-Flagler - congrats on 3 awesome schools! I have to disagree with the poster above in terms of his/her "light-years" comment. Yes, Darden is considered a tier above UNC and Emory but not for your stated goals. Internal strategy options are plentiful at UNC. There are more opportunities for internal strategy in than there are students (I am an example, with almost 12 internal strategy interviews). Also given your backup in real estate, we have one of the best real estate programs and there are a lot of students going into real estate finance especially. The fact that you also want to be in the SE, all these schools will place in NC/ATL very well. Emory is the most regional school out of the 3. If you were a MBB or bust person, then yes i'd say go to Darden 100%, but for internal strategy at F500 or real estate finance with a 1/2 scholarship, UNC is a great deal.

B

pd2pmm

Intern

Joined: 31 Mar 2020

Posts: 22

Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]

Given Kudos: 0

Schools: Ross '20 (M)

Send PM

Re: Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

01 Apr 2020, 13:46

1. Darden
2. Emory
3. Don't even think about UNC

B

CTom

Intern

Joined: 31 Mar 2020

Posts: 4

Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]

Given Kudos: 0

Schools: Goizueta '22 (A$) Darden '22 (A) Kenan-Flagler '22 (A$)

Send PM

Re: Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

03 Apr 2020, 08:10

Thanks, woody93 and abhimahna for the detailed responses. The feedback is appreciated!

pd2pmm - Could you elaborate on your comment? I'd be interested to understand your perspective in more detail. Thanks!

B

pd2pmm

Intern

Joined: 31 Mar 2020

Posts: 22

Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]

Given Kudos: 0

Schools: Ross '20 (M)

Send PM

Re: Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

03 Apr 2020, 08:42

CTom wrote:

Thanks, woody93 and abhimahna for the detailed responses. The feedback is appreciated!

pd2pmm - Could you elaborate on your comment? I'd be interested to understand your perspective in more detail. Thanks!

Emory is a great school if you want to key in on Atl or probably NC or if you just want a job. But Darden opens up much more chance for roles in elite level (Fortune 100). Also, DC is much more robust market than ATL and NC, and Darden will trounce Emory in that locale.

If your top priority is recruitment prospects, Darden takes it up multiple levels from Emory. UNC shouldn't even be considered when you get into a school like Darden, and have a solid Emory with $ as a 2nd.

G

woody93

Manager

Joined: 27 Sep 2016

Posts: 121

Own Kudos [?]: 108 [0]

Given Kudos: 11

Concentration: General Management, Strategy

Schools: Kenan-Flagler '21 (M) Goizueta '21 (A) Owen '21 (WD) McDonough '21 (A) Ross '21 (WD) McCombs '24 Tepper '24

GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V53

GRE 1: Q160 V160

Re: Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

03 Apr 2020, 09:30

pd2pmm makes it seem like UNC and Emory are in different leagues - that is not true. They are peer schools and will provide you similar experiences, with the exception being that UNC is definitely stronger in your 2nd backup which is Real Estate. They will both have similar (if not the same) recruitment with students being able to go anywhere in the southeast. I don't really understand the poster's hostility towards UNC based on his/her other posts.

That being said, as much as we'd love to have you as a Tar Heel, a full-ride at Emory is really awesome and I think you should take that Emory offer. It is a fantastic school. Of course, the decision in the end is yours! Wishing you the best of luck!

B

pd2pmm

Intern

Joined: 31 Mar 2020

Posts: 22

Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]

Given Kudos: 0

Schools: Ross '20 (M)

Send PM

Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

03 Apr 2020, 11:26

woody93 wrote:

pd2pmm makes it seem like UNC and Emory are in different leagues - that is not true. They are peer schools and will provide you similar experiences, with the exception being that UNC is definitely stronger in your 2nd backup which is Real Estate. They will both have similar (if not the same) recruitment with students being able to go anywhere in the southeast. I don't really understand the poster's hostility towards UNC based on his/her other posts.

That being said, as much as we'd love to have you as a Tar Heel, a full-ride at Emory is really awesome and I think you should take that Emory offer. It is a fantastic school. Of course, the decision in the end is yours! Wishing you the best of luck!

UNC is a fine school, but in this context of (1) admission to a higher ranked school (top12) and (2) full scholarship at a peer school with historically strong career prospects, don't consider UNC. Darden is on another level than both Emory and UNC across the board (prestige, recruiting, etc). Darden has better and broader recruiting than Emory (and UNC) in the first preference for post-MBA industry and a scholarship is nice, but you are gambling against the stronger chance of career prospects. UNC strength over Darden & Emory in the backup industry doesn't move the needle.

B

ssmba2020

Intern

Joined: 29 Jan 2016

Posts: 15

Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]

Given Kudos: 3

Location: India

Schools: McDonough '20 (A$) ISB '19 (A) Goizueta '20 (M$) Ross '20 (D) Darden '20 (D) Rotman '20 (D) Kenan-Flagler '20 (A)

GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40

GPA: 3.3

Send PM

Re: Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

07 Apr 2020, 16:45

Darden for sure provides you more opportunities, including those offered by Emory/UNC. Companies such as Georgia-Pacific, Coca-Cola, UPS etc which recruit from Emory for Internal Strategy roles, also recruit from Darden in potentially better numbers. In addition, Darden opens ALOT of other doors. Many prestigious LDP/Internal strategy programs (such as Danaher, RB etc) have no presence at Emory. In this time of uncertainty, you'd want a better brand and Darden seems to be a no-brainer.

As for plan B around Real Estate, being in Atlanta might be an advantage with Emory but UNC has a pretty famous Real Estate concentration. I am sure Darden is still a winner.

S

ket310

Manager

Joined: 04 Aug 2011

Posts: 70

Own Kudos [?]: 31 [0]

Given Kudos: 0

Location: United States (NY)

Schools: Stern '21 (M$)

GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38

GPA: 3.4

Send PM

Re: Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

08 Apr 2020, 05:59

ssmba2020 wrote:

Darden for sure provides you more opportunities, including those offered by Emory/UNC. Companies such as Georgia-Pacific, Coca-Cola, UPS etc which recruit from Emory for Internal Strategy roles, also recruit from Darden in potentially better numbers. In addition, Darden opens ALOT of other doors. Many prestigious LDP/Internal strategy programs (such as Danaher, RB etc) have no presence at Emory. In this time of uncertainty, you'd want a better brand and Darden seems to be a no-brainer.

As for plan B around Real Estate, being in Atlanta might be an advantage with Emory but UNC has a pretty famous Real Estate concentration. I am sure Darden is still a winner.

The same argument could go another way. In times of uncertainty, you definitely want to lower your debt. You will learn this in MBA class, but why do companies go bankrupt? because they cannot make their interest payment. If you or your parents are not wealthy enough to shed 160k, don't look at the full scholarship lightly. It can drag you for a long time for your next financial goals (buying a house, maxing out 401k/IRA, other things)

If your goal was MBB or consulting in non-Atlanta, I would suggest Darden. However, given that your goal is internal strategy and you're good with Atlanta, I would lean toward Emory. Yes, you might have a little bit less exposure to the prestigious internal strategy programs. Is that worth 160k to you? Only you can answer that.

L

abhimahna

Board of Directors

Joined: 18 Jul 2015

Status:Emory Goizueta Alum

Posts: 3600

Own Kudos [?]: 5425 [0]

Given Kudos: 346

Send PM

Re: Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

08 Apr 2020, 07:25

Expert Reply

ket310 wrote:

ssmba2020 wrote:

Darden for sure provides you more opportunities, including those offered by Emory/UNC. Companies such as Georgia-Pacific, Coca-Cola, UPS etc which recruit from Emory for Internal Strategy roles, also recruit from Darden in potentially better numbers. In addition, Darden opens ALOT of other doors. Many prestigious LDP/Internal strategy programs (such as Danaher, RB etc) have no presence at Emory. In this time of uncertainty, you'd want a better brand and Darden seems to be a no-brainer.

As for plan B around Real Estate, being in Atlanta might be an advantage with Emory but UNC has a pretty famous Real Estate concentration. I am sure Darden is still a winner.

The same argument could go another way. In times of uncertainty, you definitely want to lower your debt. You will learn this in MBA class, but why do companies go bankrupt? because they cannot make their interest payment. If you or your parents are not wealthy enough to shed 160k, don't look at the full scholarship lightly. It can drag you for a long time for your next financial goals (buying a house, maxing out 401k/IRA, other things)

If your goal was MBB or consulting in non-Atlanta, I would suggest Darden. However, given that your goal is internal strategy and you're good with Atlanta, I would lean toward Emory. Yes, you might have a little bit less exposure to the prestigious internal strategy programs. Is that worth 160k to you? Only you can answer that.

Yes, I completely agree with ket310 , I don't think Darden is worth $160k. Considering your family being in Atlanta, I think you will save tons of money as well as have a good support system. This will further help you focus on your goals. And after talking to my friends from different business schools in US, it is clear that if you are following the right path and are fully dedicated to your goals, no one can stop you from reaching your goals. Regarding brand name, if it is not M7, it makes a tiny difference. So, clearly Emory is a winner here.

All the best and let us know which one you choose.

B

ssmba2020

Intern

Joined: 29 Jan 2016

Posts: 15

Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]

Given Kudos: 3

Location: India

Schools: McDonough '20 (A$) ISB '19 (A) Goizueta '20 (M$) Ross '20 (D) Darden '20 (D) Rotman '20 (D) Kenan-Flagler '20 (A)

GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40

GPA: 3.3

Send PM

Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

08 Apr 2020, 09:01

Money is replaceable, time and brand are not. Think of it this way (being a banker you might be able to make sense of it) - you’d want to invest in a blue chip stock or a mid/small cap stock at this time? When there is an upturn, its the top schools who would be better placed to perform well. There is a valid point in terms of how much leverage you’d want and that is your personal decision. Maybe a good time to take debt with low interest rates as well if you have the financial capacity to take it on.

Like I said, Emory provides you nothing which Darden doesn’t in terms of opportunities. Darden, however, provides much more, both in terms of pedagogy and opportunities. Global opportunities, as you mentioned, arent easily available at Emory as well. If you’re sure you’d be content with opportunities at Emory, then ofcourse Emory makes more sense. I’d say talk to current students and alums and figure out which companies recruit for internal strategy roles. Also try negotiating for scholarship with Darden. Hope this helps.

Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum

S

ket310

Manager

Joined: 04 Aug 2011

Posts: 70

Own Kudos [?]: 31 [0]

Given Kudos: 0

Location: United States (NY)

Schools: Stern '21 (M$)

GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38

GPA: 3.4

Send PM

Re: Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

08 Apr 2020, 12:24

ssmba2020 wrote:

Money is replaceable, time and brand are not. Think of it this way (being a banker you might be able to make sense of it) - you’d want to invest in a blue chip stock or a mid/small cap stock at this time? When there is an upturn, its the top schools who would be better placed to perform well. There is a valid point in terms of how much leverage you’d want and that is your personal decision. Maybe a good time to take debt with low interest rates as well if you have the financial capacity to take it on.

Like I said, Emory provides you nothing which Darden doesn’t in terms of opportunities. Darden, however, provides much more, both in terms of pedagogy and opportunities. Global opportunities, as you mentioned, arent easily available at Emory as well. If you’re sure you’d be content with opportunities at Emory, then of course Emory makes more sense. I’d say talk to current students and alums and figure out which companies recruit for internal strategy roles. Also, try negotiating for scholarship with Darden. Hope this helps.

Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum

True, only you can figure out if leverage is something you want to take or not. My opinion is for someone targeting internal strategy in Atlanta, Darden's definitely not worth 160k more than Emory. That could definitely be different for someone gunning NY/DC MBB/IB. You obviously have a different opinion, which is fair. Everyone has different opinions. OP - just to give you a realistic number, if you take out 160k loan, your loan payment will probably be approximately 2~2.3k/month for the next ten years after you graduate. Your expected income from Darden vs Emory, you can try to do DCF to see if this makes sense for you. Maybe I'm way too debt averse and others are right, that you do MBA only once in your lifetime. Who knows. Only you can make that decision for you. Hope that was helpful.

gmatclubot

Re: Full-Time MBA: Goizeuta ($$) v Kenan-Flagler ($) v Darden [#permalink]

08 Apr 2020, 12:24