Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 22:50 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 22:50

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618853 [2]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Mar 2017
Posts: 43
Own Kudos [?]: 71 [2]
Given Kudos: 191
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
SVP
SVP
Joined: 24 Nov 2016
Posts: 1720
Own Kudos [?]: 1344 [0]
Given Kudos: 607
Location: United States
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 01 Mar 2019
Posts: 592
Own Kudos [?]: 506 [0]
Given Kudos: 207
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V21
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: Public health will improve more quickly in the wake of new medical dis [#permalink]
conclusion- That is because the public release of new medical information allows people to use that information in order to improve their health


(A) Peer review often prevents the publication of false conclusions drawn on the basis of poorly conducted medical research............CORRECT,,....without peer review we couldnt use the medicine, since in the peer review we could know if something is wrong in the medication.....

(B) People often alter their life-styles on the basis of new medical information made available through the press........discussion of LIFESTYLE....OUT OF CONTEXT....INCORRECT

(C) Some improvements in public health are due to factors other than the discovery of new medical information.......OUT OF SCOPE......INCORRECT

(D) Some newspapers would be willing to publish the results of medical research before those results have appeared in peer-reviewed journals........the willing of newpapers isnt weakening the conclusion.......INCORRECT

(E) Most peer-reviewed scientific journals would refuse to give up the practice of peer review............CLearly INCORRECT

OA:A
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2017
Posts: 76
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [1]
Given Kudos: 47
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.76
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Public health will improve more quickly in the wake of new medical dis [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Public health will improve more quickly in the wake of new medical discoveries if medical researchers abandon their practice of waiting until their findings are published in peer-reviewed journals before informing the press of important research results. That is because the public release of new medical information allows people to use that information in order to improve their health, but the peer-review process is unavoidably very slow.


Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

ANS A ..

We need to attack the argument .....
The correct answer will be that the peer review is an essential part of journal publication ( i.e the validate of research)


(A) Peer review often prevents the publication of false conclusions drawn on the basis of poorly conducted medical research.

(B) People often alter their life-styles on the basis of new medical information made available through the press.

(C) Some improvements in public health are due to factors other than the discovery of new medical information.

(D) Some newspapers would be willing to publish the results of medical research before those results have appeared in peer-reviewed journals.

(E) Most peer-reviewed scientific journals would refuse to give up the practice of peer review.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2017
Posts: 76
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [0]
Given Kudos: 47
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.76
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Public health will improve more quickly in the wake of new medical dis [#permalink]
Public health will improve more quickly in the wake of new medical discoveries if medical researchers abandon their practice of waiting until their findings are published in peer-reviewed journals before informing the press of important research results. That is because the public release of new medical information allows people to use that information in order to improve their health, but the peer-review process is unavoidably very slow.


Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

ANS A ..

We need to attack the argument .....
The correct answer will be that the peer review is an essential part of journal publication ( i.e the validate of research)


(A) Peer review often prevents the publication of false conclusions drawn on the basis of poorly conducted medical research.

(B) People often alter their life-styles on the basis of new medical information made available through the press.

(C) Some improvements in public health are due to factors other than the discovery of new medical information.

(D) Some newspapers would be willing to publish the results of medical research before those results have appeared in peer-reviewed journals.

(E) Most peer-reviewed scientific journals would refuse to give up the practice of peer review.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2019
Posts: 364
Own Kudos [?]: 281 [1]
Given Kudos: 35
Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, General Management
Schools:
GPA: 3.75
WE:Pharmaceuticals (Health Care)
Send PM
Re: Public health will improve more quickly in the wake of new medical dis [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Public health will improve more quickly in the wake of new medical discoveries if medical researchers abandon their practice of waiting until their findings are published in peer-reviewed journals before informing the press of important research results. That is because the public release of new medical information allows people to use that information in order to improve their health, but the peer-review process is unavoidably very slow.

Stimulus: Public health will improve more quickly in the wake of new medical discoveries if medical researchers abandon their practice of waiting until the research of peer review and directly make it available to public then public health will improve as the peer review step is slow.

The argument totally skips the part where in peer review of the journal the researchers work needs to be validated.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?


(A) Peer review often prevents the publication of false conclusions drawn on the basis of poorly conducted medical research. IMO A as the peer review avoids the false conclusions to be drawn and indirectly contribuutes to public health. which would have otherwise damaged the public

(B) People often alter their life-styles on the basis of new medical information made available through the press. does not support the argument

(C) Some improvements in public health are due to factors other than the discovery of new medical information.irrelevant

(D) Some newspapers would be willing to publish the results of medical research before those results have appeared in peer-reviewed journals.irrelevant does not weaken the stimulus

(E) Most peer-reviewed scientific journals would refuse to give up the practice of peer review. irrelevant does not weaken the stimulus

IMO A
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17214
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Public health will improve more quickly in the wake of new medical dis [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Public health will improve more quickly in the wake of new medical dis [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne