NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 10:35 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 10:35
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
 1   2   3   
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
joemama142000
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 645
Own Kudos [?]: 1580 [200]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   Updated on: 16 Jan 2019, 08:15
19
Kudos
181
Bookmarks
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (01:28) correct 44% (01:26) wrong based on 4345 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.


(A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would

(B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel

(C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel

(D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would

(E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
E

Originally posted by joemama142000 on 09 Dec 2005, 16:39.
Last edited by Bunuel on 16 Jan 2019, 08:15, edited 4 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
L
egmat
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4347
Own Kudos [?]: 30793 [41]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   24 Jul 2013, 07:36
20
Kudos
21
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.

Since the meaning is pretty simple to understand, let’s proceed to the Error Analysis.

ERROR ANALYSIS:

1. The federal rules were made to ensure two things:
• patients must be warned of potential risks, and
• an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted
The first entity is preceded by “that”, but the second one is not. We need before the second entity as well.

2. Use of “would evaluate” is correct because the main verb for this part of the sentence is written in simple past tense “was conducted”. Since the sentence is written in simple past tense, we must use past tense of “will” that is “would” here.
Now the entities in the list must be parallel. Since we have two clauses as entities, the context of the sentence requires that there be consistency in the verb tenses. Hence we need “would be warned”.
3. Also, “ensure” does not need the use of subjunctive verb. So “would be warned” will take care of this issue too.

PoE:

A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would: Incorrect for the reasons stated above.

B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel: Incorrect.
1. This choice repeats the verb tense (must) error as in choice A.
2. There is no need for subjunctive verb here. We do need “would” not only before “evaluate” but also before “be warned of”.

C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel: Incorrect.
1. Use of “are warned” is incorrect because the context of the sentence is set in the past tense.
2. Same “would” error as in choice B.
3. “warned of” is more formal than “warned about”. The latter is more colloquial. Hence, “warned of” is better

D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would: Incorrect.
1. Use of “will be warned” leads to verb tense error
2. “that” is missing before the second entity in the list.

E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would: Correct.

Hope this helps. :)
Thanks.
Shraddha
User avatar
L
AjiteshArun
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5181
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [14]
Given Kudos: 631
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   02 Apr 2019, 21:04
7
Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
MartinTao wrote:
I am confused.

Since we have "before it was conducted", how can we designate “would evaluate” to an action that actually happened before "some past time"?
Let's take a look at that before structure in another sentence:

NASA says that it will launch the rocket before the weather will get worse. ← This is wrong.

Before the weather will get worse is a time clause. With time clauses, if we want to communicate something about the future, we need to "pull" the verb back one step and use the simple present instead. The correct version is:

NASA says that it will launch the rocket before the weather gets worse. ← This is correct.

Now let's "backshift" everything in that sentence:

NASA says said that it will would launch the rocket before the weather gets got worse. ← This is correct.
General Discussion
User avatar
duttsit
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 496
Own Kudos [?]: 660 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: CA
Send PM
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   09 Dec 2005, 16:47
1
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
E.

would is required to indicate future, unseen, effects of federal rules.
C is incorect: tense not consistent. "it was conducted" in non-underlined portion indicates past tense.
User avatar
laxieqv
Director
Director
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 833
Own Kudos [?]: 1481 [4]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   09 Dec 2005, 19:58
2
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
joemama142000 wrote:
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.

A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would

B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel

C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel

D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would

E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would


E for parallel structure and parallel tenses and correct idiom "be warned of"
avatar
ermks279
Intern
Intern
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 26 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   15 Nov 2010, 22:06
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
E for parallel construction (that.. that..) and subjunctive usgae ( were - would )
avatar
deeptikachalia
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Jun 2010
Posts: 19
Own Kudos [?]: 32 [4]
Given Kudos: 5
Send PM
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   27 Feb 2011, 15:01
4
Kudos
I originally picked E for ||ism. But after reaching MGMAT SC and a couple of OG examples where words like 'rule' and 'laws' are associated with MUST instead of COULD/SHOULD/WOULD (since laws are mandatory and words like would/should/could imply one has a choice in obeying the law...) , I decided to go with B because that is the only option that has MUST in the beginning and removes WOULD from the second half. It didn't make sense to me but I went by the rules in MGMAT and OG. Turns out there are exceptions to the rule :-(

How to avoid this trap?
User avatar
P
MHIKER
Director
Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Status:No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Posts: 972
Own Kudos [?]: 4928 [3]
Given Kudos: 690
Concentration: Accounting
Send PM
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   29 Jan 2012, 02:05
2
Kudos
would is needed for future potentiality and parallel construction (that.. that..)
Thus E.
User avatar
Zarrolou
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Status:Far, far away!
Posts: 859
Own Kudos [?]: 4891 [10]
Given Kudos: 219
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   24 Jul 2013, 04:39
8
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.

The sentence says "evaluate" so we cannot place an "an independent panel" before (is singular). Out B and C.
The sentence also says "were", hence we are talking about the past; so the verb "will" is not correct.
If we are in the past, and we want to make a prediction about the future "would" is correct over "will". This eliminates option D.

A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would
E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would

The parallelism in A is not correct, E, on the other hand, is perfectly parallel: to ensure patients would be warned and that an independent panel would .
avatar
S
teaserbae
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2018
Posts: 198
Own Kudos [?]: 41 [0]
Given Kudos: 288
Location: India
Schools: Carlson Foster '24 Haas '24 Kelley '24 Kellogg '24
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
Send PM
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   17 Jan 2019, 03:48
daagh Bishal123456789

I was able to narrow to A and E
But why would is preffered over must since parallelism is alright in A and E
User avatar
L
daagh
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [4]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   17 Jan 2019, 05:01
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
A is flouting that 'that' parallelism. The rules wanted that X would be done and that Y would be done. E is using that for both the requirements.
Since this is fundamental, the use of must is not an issue between the two choices.
User avatar
S
MartinTao
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Dec 2018
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 203 [2]
Given Kudos: 116
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V35
Send PM
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   02 Apr 2019, 09:43
2
Kudos
I am confused.

Since we have "before it was conducted", how can we designate “would evaluate” to an action that actually happened before "some past time"?
avatar
B
tejaswym95
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2017
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 21
Location: India
Schools: ISB'22 Rotman '23
Send PM
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   06 Apr 2020, 01:41
What is the difference between Option A and Option B regarding the usage 'That X and Y' and 'that X and that Y' in this case? I'd like to know difference in meaning in both cases.

Thanks,
TejaSV
User avatar
L
CrackverbalGMAT
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7626 [0]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   06 Apr 2020, 06:47
tejaswym95 wrote:
What is the difference between Option A and Option B regarding the usage 'That X and Y' and 'that X and that Y' in this case? I'd like to know difference in meaning in both cases.

Thanks,
TejaSV


Hi Tejaswy

It helps, in such cases, to think of this as being similar to a mathematical expression with parentheses. Expanding the parentheses would lead to application of the clause outside to each section within. In this particular case:

A) The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that (patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted).

Expanding this applies "that" to both "patients must be..." and "an independent panel..."

B) The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure (that patients must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted).

Here, expansion of the parentheses applies "ensure" to "that patients must be..." and "that an independent panel...".

The above is used to assess what must be parallel. From a meaning point of view, both usages are grammatically correct and lead to the same meaning.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
L
EducationAisle
CEO
CEO
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 3675
Own Kudos [?]: 3528 [6]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Send PM
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   06 Apr 2020, 07:26
3
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
tejaswym95 wrote:
What is the difference between Option A and Option B regarding the usage 'That X and Y' and 'that X and that Y' in this case? I'd like to know difference in meaning in both cases.

Hi tejaswym95, with option E, the sentence is:

(a) The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.

Without repeating that, the sentence will be:

(b) The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients would be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.

The repetition of that in (a) makes these two that structures parallel, clearly conveying that federal rules were established to ensure two things, since the structure is:

federal rules were established to ensure that <one-thing> and that <another-thing>

On the other hand, the absence of second that in (b) could imply the following interpretation:
(i) The federal rules were established to ensure that patients <one-thing> and
(ii) an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.

In other words, (ii) above (an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted) could as well be the opinion of the author (and not necessarily an aim of the federal rules).

To summarize, repetition of that prevents the kind of interpretation as suggested in (b),

On that note, there are quite a few official examples, where that is repeated, but this just seems to be a preference of GMAT (especially when the second clause is quite far from the first), and not a rule.

For example, following would be correct:

Teacher suggested that Jack work hard and show the results.

What is not needed is:

Teacher suggested that Jack work hard and that Jack show the results.

Let's see some official examples where that is repeated:

#47, OG-13:
In 1713, Alexander Pope began his translation of the Illiad, a work that took him seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced the greatest translation in any language.

#97, OG-13:
Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a population bottleneck-that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers and thus our genetic variation.

#3, Verbal Supplement:
However much United States voters may agree that there is a waste in government and that the government as a whole spends beyond its means, it is difficult to find broad support for a movement towards a minimal state.
User avatar
P
jabhatta2
VP
VP
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Posts: 1374
Own Kudos [?]: 207 [0]
Given Kudos: 189
Send PM
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   17 Jan 2021, 16:43
VeritasKarishma GMATNinja - with regards to option C C

-- for the Y element in option C

Is there a verb tense for the Y element specifically ?
User avatar
L
KarishmaB
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14823
Own Kudos [?]: 64916 [0]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   18 Jan 2021, 02:06
Expert Reply
jabhatta2 wrote:
VeritasKarishma GMATNinja - with regards to option C C

-- for the Y element in option C

Is there a verb tense for the Y element specifically ?


The entire sentence is in the past. Notice the non underlined part.

rules ... were established to ensure that ... before it was conducted.

So you use 'would'.
avatar
B
pk6969
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 May 2020
Posts: 136
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: Babson CBS '23 Broad
GPA: 3.2
Send PM
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   24 May 2021, 03:53
joemama142000 wrote:
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.


(A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would

(B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel

(C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel

(D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would

(E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would


In this question, I chose C and justified it because rules are present today also and are ensuring both the things as well. So present tense made more sense to me. There is nothing mentioned about rules being not there today and not ensuring. So, C was more concise and hence chose it.PLease Help where I am going wrong? AndrewN GMATNinja DmitryFarber
avatar
L
AndrewN
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3512
Own Kudos [?]: 6859 [4]
Given Kudos: 500
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   24 May 2021, 07:36
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
pk6969 wrote:
joemama142000 wrote:
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.


(A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would

(B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel

(C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel

(D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would

(E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would


In this question, I chose C and justified it because rules are present today also and are ensuring both the things as well. So present tense made more sense to me. There is nothing mentioned about rules being not there today and not ensuring. So, C was more concise and hence chose it.PLease Help where I am going wrong? AndrewN GMATNinja DmitryFarber

Hello, pk6969. Choice (C) presents a trap for the unwitting test-taker who does not read and consider the entire sentence. I, too, like the flow of rules were established to ensure that patients are warned. In isolation, the sentence would work just fine. However, we cannot ignore the parallel marker and that that prefaces the latter part of the sentence. We need to check for parallelism:

1) The rules were established to ensure that patients are warned... AND
2) [The rules were established to ensure] that an independent panel evaluate the experiment

Now, why do the verb tenses not match up? You should keep in mind that the GMAT™ prefers a tight parallel structure whenever possible. A look at (E) shows the difference:

3) The rules were established to ensure that patients would be warned... AND
4) [The rules were established to ensure] that an independent panel would evaluate the experiment

In both halves, we get an embedded clause with a subject followed by a verb in the same tense, would + [infinitive]. There is no real need to evaluate whether would is the best way of expressing each half. It works, plain and simple, and the parallel elements are consistent, so the answer choice is hard to argue against. (E) is a superior answer to (C).

The way to get the upper hand on even the toughest SC questions is to be cautious. Your goal is not to chase the correct answer, but to get behind the one that is hardest to find fault with. Work from the ground up with fundamentals.

I hope that helps. Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
S
lakshya14
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 368
Own Kudos [?]: 43 [0]
Given Kudos: 530
Send PM
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink] New post   24 May 2021, 07:57
AndrewN wrote:
pk6969 wrote:
joemama142000 wrote:
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.


(A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would

(B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel

(C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel

(D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would

(E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would


In this question, I chose C and justified it because rules are present today also and are ensuring both the things as well. So present tense made more sense to me. There is nothing mentioned about rules being not there today and not ensuring. So, C was more concise and hence chose it.PLease Help where I am going wrong? AndrewN GMATNinja DmitryFarber

Hello, pk6969. Choice (C) presents a trap for the unwitting test-taker who does not read and consider the entire sentence. I, too, like the flow of rules were established to ensure that patients are warned. In isolation, the sentence would work just fine. However, we cannot ignore the parallel marker and that that prefaces the latter part of the sentence. We need to check for parallelism:

1) The rules were established to ensure that patients are warned... AND
2) [The rules were established to ensure] that an independent panel evaluate the experiment

Now, why do the verb tenses not match up? You should keep in mind that the GMAT™ prefers a tight parallel structure whenever possible. A look at (E) shows the difference:

3) The rules were established to ensure that patients would be warned... AND
4) [The rules were established to ensure] that an independent panel would evaluate the experiment

In both halves, we get an embedded clause with a subject followed by a verb in the same tense, would + [infinitive]. There is no real need to evaluate whether would is the best way of expressing each half. It works, plain and simple, and the parallel elements are consistent, so the answer choice is hard to argue against. (E) is a superior answer to (C).

The way to get the upper hand on even the toughest SC questions is to be cautious. Your goal is not to chase the correct answer, but to get behind the one that is hardest to find fault with. Work from the ground up with fundamentals.

I hope that helps. Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew


i chose (B). there is no "would " and both the stems look parallel?
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi [#permalink]
24 May 2021, 07:57
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions