Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 22:36 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 22:36

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jul 2020
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 110 [15]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: India
Schools: LBS '22 HEC
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Dec 2014
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 39
Send PM
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Posts: 3137
Own Kudos [?]: 2769 [2]
Given Kudos: 1510
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Jul 2020
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: High blood pressure in the U.S. population is significantly more [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
C correctly places the modifier "is significantly prevalent" in the right place to refer to high blood pressure. Also, high blood pressure in US is compared with Swiss correctly with the "it is" words.
D is disqualified due to wrong modifier placement. "Is significantly prevalent" in this case refers to population which changes the meaning.

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Jan 2019
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [4]
Given Kudos: 16
Send PM
Re: High blood pressure in the U.S. population is significantly more [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
What follows after comparison has to be parallel.

In option D, to maintain parallelism, replace "it" with phrase,
High blood pressure in the U.S. population is significantly more prevalent than [High blood pressure in the U.S. population] is in the Swiss population.

This is nonsensical. Whereas in C,
In the U.S. population, high blood pressure is significantly more prevalent than [high blood pressure] is in the Swiss population.

This comparison is clear and makes sense.

Request experts to evaluate.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 May 2019
Posts: 131
Own Kudos [?]: 556 [0]
Given Kudos: 143
Location: India
Send PM
Re: High blood pressure in the U.S. population is significantly more [#permalink]
ninja10 wrote:
What follows after comparison has to be parallel.

In option D, to maintain parallelism, replace "it" with phrase,
High blood pressure in the U.S. population is significantly more prevalent than [High blood pressure in the U.S. population] is in the Swiss population.

This is nonsensical. Whereas in C,
In the U.S. population, high blood pressure is significantly more prevalent than [high blood pressure] is in the Swiss population.

This comparison is clear and makes sense.

Request experts to evaluate.


Do we really need to take the whole phrase in place of "it"? Can "It" also refer just to high blood pressure
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jul 2020
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 110 [4]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: India
Schools: LBS '22 HEC
Send PM
Re: High blood pressure in the U.S. population is significantly more [#permalink]
1
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
High blood pressure in the U.S. population is significantly more prevalent than the Swiss population, although the Swiss eat more cheese from France and drink more beer from Belgium than Americans eat and drink.

Official Explanation:

A) High blood pressure in the U.S. population is significantly more prevalent than the Swiss population,

This version illogically compares how prevalent high blood pressure is in the U.S population with how prevalent the Swiss population is.
(Incorrect)

B) In the U.S., high blood pressure in the population is significantly more prevalent than in the Swiss,

Because this version opens with "in the U.S.," what is expressed by the clause that follows "in the U.S" is understood to be the case in the U.S. so, this version is subtly illogical, because it conveys that it is the case in the U.S. that high blood pressure in the population is more prevalent than in the Swiss, as if both "the population" and "the Swiss" are in the U.S. and high blood pressure is more prevalent in the former than in the latter.
(Incorrect)

C) In the U.S. population, high blood pressure is significantly more prevalent than it is in the Swiss population,

Because, in this version, "it" refers to "high blood pressure", this version logically compares how prevalent high blood pressure is in the U.S population with how prevalent it is in the Swiss population, as we can see by substituting "high blood pressure" for "it" in the sentence.
In the U.S population, high blood pressure is significantly more prevalent than it is in the Swiss population

In the U.S. population, high blood pressure is significantly more prevalent than high blood pressure is in the Swiss population
(Correct)

D) High blood pressure in the U.S. population is significantly more prevalent than it is in the Swiss population,

Since the logical referent of "it" in this version is "high blood pressure in the U.S. population," this version illogically compares high blood pressure in the U.S. population with high blood pressure in the U.S. population, as we can see by substituting "high blood pressure in the U.S. population" for "it".
High blood pressure in the U.S. population is significantly more prevalent than it is in the Swiss population
High blood pressure in the U.S. population is significantly more prevalent than high blood pressure in the U.S. population is in the Swiss population.
Also, because "it" refers to "high blood pressure in the U.S population," this version suggests the nonsensical idea that high blood pressure in the U.S. population is in the swiss population.
(Incorrect)

E) In the U.S, high blood pressure is significantly more prevalent than Switzerland,

This version is blatantly illogical because it compare high blood pressure with Switzerland.
(Incorrect)
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 May 2021
Posts: 92
Own Kudos [?]: 38 [0]
Given Kudos: 24
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V39
GMAT 3: 710 Q48 V39
GRE 1: Q166 V152
GPA: 3.4
Send PM
Re: High blood pressure in the U.S. population is significantly more [#permalink]
How do we know "it" refers to "high blood pressure in the U.S population" or "high blood pressure".
Also, in C, In the U.S. population, is modifying the whole clause which does not make sense.

Can someone shed some light on this?

Thanks
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17214
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: High blood pressure in the U.S. population is significantly more [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: High blood pressure in the U.S. population is significantly more [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne