Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 12:53 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 12:53

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 May 2016
Posts: 46
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 106
Location: India
Schools: Ivey
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V39
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 May 2016
Posts: 46
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 106
Location: India
Schools: Ivey
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V39
Send PM
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [0]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 May 2016
Posts: 46
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 106
Location: India
Schools: Ivey
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V39
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
daagh wrote:
Kunal
Can you please explain why 'like' is being used wrongly in this case. After all, like is comparing two nouns and that is it precise purpose. In other words, may I know when 'like ' should be used, if not while comparing nouns?
It is the same way, in the cited example. Like is comparing a computer with an expert, two nouns. and what is wrong with that? It will be better if you say also why you suspect it and what is the reason behind your own perception about the use of like or when it is wrong. Please elaborate.



Hi daagh,

Apologies for not elaborating earlier. I believe the usage of "like" is absolutely correct in option C of this question since it compares 2 nouns. However, I noticed that the official solution states that the usage is incorrect in this case. Please refer to the official solution below (posted by someone in a post above).

"Official Explanation

Rhetorical Construction; Diction

While the use of hopefully, as used in the sentence as written, to mean I hope that or let's hope that, is well established, this use is considered to be informal. For this reason, it is generally avoided in writing.

When it is used in this way in writing, however, it must be used at the beginning of a sentence or at the beginning of an independent clause, and be set off by the use of commas. In any case, the use of hopefully in this sentence is incorrect: in a technical sense, it implies that the enabling of the astronomers will be hopeful.

A. The use of hopefully here is incorrect, for the reasons given above.

B. Correct. The use of it is hoped (as opposed to hopefully) here properly conveys the intended meaning of the sentence. Furthermore, the use of in the way appropriately conveys, unlike the answer choices using like or such as, that what is being compared is the interaction, or lack thereof, of gravity waves, on one hand, and electromagnetic waves, on the other, with matter.

C. The use of like incorrectly implies that electromagnetic waves are a type of matter. Furthermore, the use of hopefully is incorrect, for the reasons given above.

D. The use of like incorrectly implies that electromagnetic waves are a type of matter. Furthermore, the use of hopefully is incorrect, for the reasons given above.

E. The use of such as is inappropriate here: first, such as must be followed by a noun, or list of nouns, rather than a noun followed by a verb, as in electromagnetic waves do; second, the use of like incorrectly implies that electromagnetic waves are a type of matter.

The correct answer is B."
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 1691
Own Kudos [?]: 14673 [1]
Given Kudos: 766
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
kunaldutt15 wrote:
EMPOWERgmatVerbal wrote:
Hello Everyone!

Let's tackle this question, one thing at a time, and narrow down our options quickly so we know how to answer questions like this when they pop up on the GMAT! To begin, let's take a quick look at the question and highlight any major differences between the options in orange:

The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable astronomers to study the actual formation of black holes and neutron stars.

A. in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable
B. in the way electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable
C. like electromagnetic waves, hopefully will enable
D. like electromagnetic waves, would enable, hopefully
E. such as electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable

After a quick glance over the options, we have 2 main areas we can focus our attention on to narrow down our choices:

1. in the way / like / such as
2. hopefully will enable / will, it is hoped, enable / would enable, hopefully


Let's start with #1 on our list: in the way / like / such as. Each of these are used for different things, so we need to make sure they are used correctly in terms of both idiom structure and parallelism. To make this easier to spot, I've added in the first part of the phrase:

A. which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable = CORRECT
(compares how matter interacts with how electromagnetic waves interact, which is parallel)

B. which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable = CORRECT
(compares how matter interacts with how electromagnetic waves interact, which is parallel)

C. which do not interact with matter like electromagnetic waves, hopefully will enable = WRONG
(compares how matter interacts to electromagnetic waves, which is not parallel - you must compare actions to actions, not actions to things)

D. which do not interact with matter like electromagnetic waves, would enable, hopefully = WRONG
(compares how matter interacts to electromagnetic waves, which is not parallel - you must compare actions to actions, not actions to things)

E. which do not interact with matter such as electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable = WRONG
("such as" is ONLY used to provide examples of something; electromagnetic waves are not an example of matter, so this doesn't work)

We can eliminate options C, D, & E because they either use the wrong idiom or use non-parallel comparisons.

Now that we have it narrowed down to only 2 options, let's explore them more closely to find their differences and consider which one is the better choice. To make problems easier to spot, let's add in the non-underlined parts:

A. The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable astronomers to study the actual formation of black holes and neutron stars.

This is INCORRECT because the use of "hopefully" is problematic. It's an adverb that isn't being used as an adverb, which is wrong. It actually suggests that the astronomers enabling is hopeful, not that someone else hopes that the astronomers will be enabled to study black holes and neuron stars.

B. The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable astronomers to study the actual formation of black holes and neutron stars.

This is CORRECT! It fixes the "hopefully" problem in option D, and uses a parallel comparison.


There you have it - option D is the correct choice!


Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.



Hi EMPOWERgmatVerbal,

I am confused about the usage of "like" here. I encountered a similar usage of "like" in a different question. Would you mind going through the question in the link below and helping me understand why it is correct in that question and incorrect in this one? I am not sure but I might be missing something here.

https://gmatclub.com/forum/proponents-of-artificial-intelligence-say-they-will-be-able-to-make-co-17516.html

Thanks,
Kunal


Hi kunaldutt15

In the question you linked to, the phrases "like an expert" and "as an expert does" are tricky. There's a meaning issue here:

like an expert = comparing computers and experts = OKAY
as an expert does = computer is doing something at the same time as the expert = WRONG

The word "as" can sometimes be used to compare two nouns performing actions, but it can also be used to show that two actions happen at the same time. In this case, it's better to use "like" because it creates a clear comparison, whereas "as" could mean either option.

I hope that helps! Feel free to tag me at EMPOWERgmatVerbal if you have any other questions!
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4347
Own Kudos [?]: 30796 [2]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
kunaldutt15 wrote:

I understand that "hopefully" is not acceptable in GMAT. But, is the use of "like" correct in option C? I believe Its comparing "gravity waves" with "electromagnetic waves".

Thanks in advance.
Kunal




Hello Kunal/kunaldutt15,

I am aware that you have gotten a couple of responses to this query. However, here is the explanation of what the official explanation says about the usage of like in Choice C.

In Choice C, the noun electromagnetic waves has been compared to the noun matter and not gravity waves. It is so because the word like is directly preceded by the noun matter.

To compare electromagnetic waves correctly with gravity waves, there must be a comma before the word like. Then only the noun after the word like, in this case electromagnetic waves, will be compared to the subject, in this case which = gravity waves. So yes, the usage of like in Choice C prsents illogical comparison.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2019
Posts: 181
Own Kudos [?]: 254 [0]
Given Kudos: 130
Location: Peru
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
Hopefully is not inmediately incorrect, and here is a definition by Oxford dictionary that is in line with the OE:

hopefully

1) Used to express what you hope will happen*

E.g. Hopefully, we'll arrive before dark.

*Although this is the most common use of hopefully, it is a fairly new use and some people think it is not correct.

2) Showing hope

E.g. Are you free tonight?’ she asked hopefully.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Posts: 365
Own Kudos [?]: 78 [0]
Given Kudos: 832
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
Dear AjiteshArun DmitryFarber GMATRockstar GMATGuruNY IanStewart MartyTargetTestPrep VeritasPrepHailey GMATNinja,

Is choice A. wrong because of the placement of "hopefully"?

I mean if choice A. were:

The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will HOPEFULLY enable astronomers to study the actual formation of black holes and neutron stars.

Would the above be correct?

I've got this idea from an example in https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/hopefully:
By then the problem will hopefully have been solved.

Originally posted by kornn on 01 Jul 2020, 20:20.
Last edited by kornn on 01 Jul 2020, 20:33, edited 1 time in total.
Stacy Blackman Consulting Director of Test Prep
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Affiliations: Stacy Blackman Consulting
Posts: 237
Own Kudos [?]: 393 [4]
Given Kudos: 165
Location: United States (DC)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
GPA: 3.11
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
4
Kudos
varotkorn wrote:
Dear VeritasPrepBrian VeritasPrepHailey AnthonyRitz AjiteshArun DmitryFarber IanStewart GMATGuruNY MartyTargetTestPrep GMATRockstar GMATNinja,


Quote:
But because the gravity waves are inanimate, they can't "hopefully" do anything...that would require them to have hope! "It is hoped" removes that direct tie to the subject and verb, so it's then open to some human entity to have the hope, which is more more logical.

According to an example in https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/hopefully:
By then the problem will hopefully have been solved.

"the problem" is an inanimate object and can't have hope. Yet "the problem" is used together with "hopefully."
I'm very confused here.

Please help :)


The first thing to note is that this question is 32+ years old. The GMAT has, over the years, moved away from idiom and fine-line diction distinctions, and I'm quite confident that this question's A-versus-B split would not pass muster on the modern GMAT. I strongly suggest sticking to questions from after 2009, since my understanding is that's approximately when GMAC changed vendors writing its verbal content, and stuff before that date is open to some degree of question in a few cases.

And even if this usage of "hopefully" would have been totally wrong when this question was written, 32 years is also a long time for usage to evolve. For instance, the singular indefinite "they" is now accepted by every major English dictionary, but I'm willing to guess that this was not the case in 1988. The word "hopefully" has, in more recent years, increasingly been used to mean "it is hoped." As Mizar18 says, above,

Mizar18 wrote:
Hopefully is not inmediately incorrect, and here is a definition by Oxford dictionary that is in line with the OE:

hopefully

1) Used to express what you hope will happen*

E.g. Hopefully, we'll arrive before dark.

*Although this is the most common use of hopefully, it is a fairly new use and some people think it is not correct.


Even your very own citation, from a dictionary I do not know, says this before including the example you gave:

Quote:
a way of saying what you hope will happen, which some people think is incorrect


So your fix wouldn't really change much for the sticklers who object to this usage.

The best basis I can give you for eliminating A, here in 2020, is that, given the two potential usages of "hopefully," A may create some degree of ambiguity that is definitely not present in the very good answer B.

Anyway, the real point is this: Although there are certainly still "hopefully" absolutists out there, I think that this usage has become common and accepted enough that we would never, in 2020, rest a GMAT wrong answer directly on it. (However, note that it is also still controversial enough that I strongly suspect that the GMAT would never put this usage in a correct answer, either.)

Originally posted by AnthonyRitz on 01 Jul 2020, 21:30.
Last edited by bb on 12 Apr 2021, 12:40, edited 2 times in total.
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 4128
Own Kudos [?]: 9244 [4]
Given Kudos: 91
 Q51  V47
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
4
Kudos
Expert Reply
This is a really old problem, and I'd be surprised if anything similar appeared on the test now. "Hopefully" has two definitions -- it can mean "in a hopeful way", or something like "I hope that". Strict grammarians used to insist that only the first of those two meanings was correct. But the second meaning is now so common that I'd be surprised if many people (including the GMAT) still considered it incorrect. Language evolves, and it's how we use words that determines what is "correct" and "incorrect".

Because "hopefully" has two definitions, though, using the word can create ambiguity. In the sentence:

If we hear a report that Halley's Comet is coming, we will hopefully look to the night sky.

that could mean: "we will look to the sky with hope" (hoping to see the comet)
or it could mean "I hope we will look to the sky" (i.e. I hope we will look for the comet instead of doing something else altogether)

That ambiguity disappears if you replace the word "hopefully" with a more precise phrase. But I don't think there's any chance a contemporary GMAT SC question will test this distinction.

If you're quoting posts from another forum, could you please indicate their author? For one thing, people should be credited for what they wrote, and for another, it helps anyone reading the forum here to judge whether the quote is worth reading.

edit: I just noticed Anthony posted a reply while I was writing mine -- I agree with everything he says above.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Posts: 249
Own Kudos [?]: 34 [0]
Given Kudos: 70
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
I have seen various replies, about the exception usage of hope/hopefully.
But here in the correct option, a whole independent clause is placed(there is a subject - it - and also verb - is hoped)with just a comma after will. How is it correct?
Also why the antecedent of "it" not an issue here?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Posts: 186
Own Kudos [?]: 64 [0]
Given Kudos: 407
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
FYI — this question is in the advanced OG 2020

Now can anyone explain why hopefully is incorrect?



Posted from my mobile device

AjiteshArun GMATNinja hey guys, please help
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5181
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [1]
Given Kudos: 631
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
INSEADIESE wrote:
FYI — this question is in the advanced OG 2020

Now can anyone explain why hopefully is incorrect?

AjiteshArun GMATNinja hey guys, please help

Hi INSEADIESE,

Some (very few!) people believe that the proper meaning of hopefully is ~"in a way that expresses hope" and not ~"it is hoped that". For example:

1. Hopefully, our team will win. ← Those people would feel that this sentence means "our team will win expressing hope" or "our team will win in a manner that expresses hope", whereas what we want to say is "it is hoped that/we hope that our team will win".

2. {something}... hopefully will enable... ← Here the hopefully is not even before the clause. Some people may choose to interpret this as "something will enable in a hopeful manner" and not "it is hoped that something will enable".

Needless to say, this is an absurd position to take. At the end of the day, even though this question is in one of the current OGs, it is very old (30+ years). Hopefully, live questions on the GMAT don't look at hopefully the way this question does.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Posts: 37
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 92
Location: India
Schools: ISB'22 (A)
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
daagh wrote:
The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable astronomers to study the actual formation of black holes and neutron stars.

A. in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable
B. in the way electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable
C. like electromagnetic waves, hopefully will enable
D. like electromagnetic waves, would enable, hopefully
E. such as electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable

The first entry point is the use of the adverb ''hopefully' which goes against the vibe and the ethos of GMAT. For whatever reason, GMAT has not approved that word. So we can boldly remove A, C, and D.
Between B and E, the meaning is completely warped in E; B is the answer


Hi Sir daagh ,
How many such words( GMAT doesn't like) are there, any way to find out those? These special rules are creating lots of problem, any pointers to get over these obstacles.
In one of the questions of GMAT club grammar, incidentally is used, this use is legit? In one of option "as it is a fact" is used in place of incidentally.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/mohammed-ali ... l#p1160438
Stacy Blackman Consulting Director of Test Prep
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Affiliations: Stacy Blackman Consulting
Posts: 237
Own Kudos [?]: 393 [2]
Given Kudos: 165
Location: United States (DC)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
GPA: 3.11
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
2
Kudos
GAURAV1113 wrote:
daagh wrote:
The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable astronomers to study the actual formation of black holes and neutron stars.

A. in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable
B. in the way electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable
C. like electromagnetic waves, hopefully will enable
D. like electromagnetic waves, would enable, hopefully
E. such as electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable

The first entry point is the use of the adverb ''hopefully' which goes against the vibe and the ethos of GMAT. For whatever reason, GMAT has not approved that word. So we can boldly remove A, C, and D.
Between B and E, the meaning is completely warped in E; B is the answer


Hi Sir daagh ,
How many such words( GMAT doesn't like) are there, any way to find out those? These special rules are creating lots of problem, any pointers to get over these obstacles.
In one of the questions of GMAT club grammar, incidentally is used, this use is legit? In one of option "as it is a fact" is used in place of incidentally.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/mohammed-ali ... l#p1160438


I strongly disapprove of this approach. Please do not do this! See above for my take on this question. (TL;DR: It's a bad question, at least given the modern usage of "hopefully," and it would never, ever be asked in 2020.) But in no event should anyone try to memorize a list of words that "the GMAT doesn't like."
Current Student
Joined: 18 Aug 2020
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 14
Location: Colombia
Schools: IESE'23 (A)
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
Hello, Can someone please explain me why option B is not a "run-on"
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63668 [1]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
shanks2020 wrote:
I have seen various replies, about the exception usage of hope/hopefully.
But here in the correct option, a whole independent clause is placed(there is a subject - it - and also verb - is hoped)with just a comma after will. How is it correct?
Also why the antecedent of "it" not an issue here?

DanielPlested wrote:
Hello, Can someone please explain me why option B is not a "run-on"

Consider the following example:

  • "The restaurant owners have implemented a plan. The plan will, they hope, boost revenues." - The phrase "they hope" is just some additional modifying information that tells us that the plan will not definitely boost revenues. Instead, the owners hope that the plan will boost revenues.

Now let's change "they hope" to "it is hoped":

  • "The restaurant owners have implemented a plan. The plan will, it is hoped, boost revenues." - In the last example, the owners were doing the hoping. In this example, an unknown subject is doing the hoping. In other words, we know that some person (or group of people) hopes that the plan will boost revenues. But we don't know who that person (or group of people) is.

Choice (B) expresses something similar. We know that some person (or group of people) hopes that the use of gravity waves will enable astronomers to study the actual formation of black holes and neutron stars. But we don't know who that person (or group of people) is.

Yes, (B) has an "it" without an antecedent. As explained in this post, such "non-referential" pronouns, though rare in correct answer choices on the GMAT, are not inherently wrong.

As mentioned in this great post by AjiteshArun, this is a very old question, and I wouldn't worry too much about "hopefully" vs "it is hoped". :)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Jun 2019
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 17 [0]
Given Kudos: 91
Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
I got a question - if the comparisons in C and D were "Like electromagnetic waves do" - would that be right?

Also, in E - if we remove the such and say "as electromagnetic waves do" - would that be right as well? thanks!
CEO
CEO
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 3675
Own Kudos [?]: 3528 [0]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
Expert Reply
d00m wrote:
I got a question - if the comparisons in C and D were "Like electromagnetic waves do" - would that be right?

Hi d00m, "Like electromagnetic waves do" would be incorrect because like is a preposition and so, can only be followed by a noun/noun-phrase. Like cannot be followed by a verb ("do" in this case). In fact, this is the #1 incorrect usage of like tested on GMAT. So, you need to be very careful about this.

"as electromagnetic waves do" would have been correct.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Mar 2019
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 108
GMAT 1: 680 Q45 V38
Send PM
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
MartyTargetTestPrep
What do u think about the word "hopefully" in the GMAT?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way [#permalink]
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne