rajatr wrote:
To reduce the danger to life and property posed by major earthquakes, scientists have been investigating several techniques for giving advance warning of dangerous earthquakes. Since catfish swim erratically before earthquakes, some investigators have proposed monitoring catfish to predict dangerous earthquakes.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the usefulness of the proposal?
(A) In Japan, which is subject to frequent earthquakes, the behavior of catfish has long been associated with earthquakes.
(B) Mechanical methods for detecting earthquakes have not proved effective.
(C) Tremors lead to the release of hydrogen sulfide gas into water, thereby causing various fish and shellfish to behave erratically.
(D) Careful construction can reduce the dangers posed by earthquakes.
(E) Even very slight, fleeting tremors cause catfish to swim erratically
(A)
In Japan, which is subject to frequent earthquakes, the behavior of catfish has long been
associated with earthquakes. Strengthener(B)
Mechanical methods for detecting earthquakes have not proved effective.
Out of scope(C) Tremors lead to the release of hydrogen sulfide gas into water, thereby causing
various fish and shellfish to behave erratically.
Out of scope(D)
Careful construction can reduce the dangers posed by earthquakes.
Out of scope(E) Even very slight, fleeting tremors cause catfish to swim erratically.
Correct. _________________
"Do not watch clock; Do what it does. KEEP GOING."