sachin1114GMCKS wrote:
basecamper09 wrote:
Any idea if it is good to apply for Round -3?
What's the general idea of having this round? to look for Only exceptional candidates, if any or what?
Can someone shed light on this? because with a 690/700 after taking lot of effort and applying if you finally realize that the Round-3s are esentially for very limited seats only for stellar profiles, it will be a joke of sorts
The 140 seats for the batch are almost equally distributed throughout the three rounds. So any person has an equal chance to get an admit if they apply to R3. The pros can be that almost all other applicants who were serious have already got admits in r1/r2 and then you have lesser people appying. The con is that all the people who did not get an admit to any of the colleges of their choice would potentially be appying.
Is this Really the case? I feel R-3 is an equalizer round. For eg, your class has too many IT folks, males, engineers etc etc.. use R-3 to bring in diversity, throw in some commerce or arts folks, throw in some females, throw in some weird career path fellows, get the picture? Maybe stellar GMAT scores won't be seen this time but diveristy bit will have more weightage in my opinion because there is no rational in having three rounds with equal seat distribution? why would anyone do that
R-1 : for early applicants
R-2: for those who missed the bus
R-3: diversity and inclusivity
Just my thoughts