George has a total of B books in his library, 25 of which are hardcove

Statement 1:-

Total fiction books= 40
Hardcover fiction books= 25
So, paper-cover fiction books= 15 (40-25)

Since the total books is B and and fiction books are 40. Non fiction would be (B-40)

We don't know the value of non-fiction books (both hard cover and paper cover)
Not sufficient.

Statement 2

Hardcover books= 60
Fiction and Hardcover books= 25

So, non fiction hardcover books are= 35 (60-35)

Just as in statement 1, this statement does not give us the number of paper-cover book (both fiction and non fiction)
Not sufficient.

Combining both statements, we do not get the answer as we do not know the number of non-fiction and paper-cover books.

E is the answer
_________________

Stem
FI | NF |
---------------
25 | ?? | HC
---------------
?? | ?? | PB
---------------

1)
FI | NF |
---------------
25 | ?? | HC
---------------
15 | ?? | PB
---------------
^
||
Total = 40
Insufficient

2)
FI | NF |
---------------
25 | 35 | HC <= Total = 60
---------------
?? | ?? | PB
---------------
Insufficient

Both
FI | NF |
---------------
25 | 35 | HC
---------------
15 | ?? | PB
---------------
Insufficient

E is the answer.

Video solution from Quant Reasoning:
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1

A couple of ways to solve this question:

Venn Diagram Method: https://youtu.be/5G5IwHoHjgk
Chart Method: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCn-r_4rNFI

In this kind of DS questions are fiction/non-fiction and hardcover/paperback options exhaustive? If there is no note that he has only these kinds of books, we can't assume it, right?

We cannot assume that because each of the statements clearly stated " and the rest ", implying other options could not be assumed.
_________________

There are 4 categories of Books
P = Fiction & Hardcover
Q = Fiction & Paperback
R = Non-Fiction & Hardcover
S = Non-Fiction & Paperback

P+Q+R+S = B (given)
P = 25
Find Value of B

STMT 01: P+Q = 40
P=25 => Q = 15
P+Q+R+S = B
40+R+S = B
Since values of R & S are unknown. This stmt is insufficient.

STMT 02: P + R = 60
P=25 => R = 35
Q+S+60 = S
Since values of Q & S are unknow. This stmt is insufficient

STMT 01 & 02:
P=25 ; Q=15 ; R = 35 ; S = ?
P+Q+R+S = B
75+S = B
Still value of S is unknown. Hence E.

I completely agree that this question can be answered efficiently using a matrix box approach, also known as the double matrix. The one thing I want to add to this discussion is to answer the question: How do we know that we can use a matrix box on this question?

Whenever we see that a group can be divided into 2 parts in 2 different ways, we can use a matrix box. In this case, George's books can be divided into fiction and nonfiction (1st way) and hardcover and paperback (2nd way). This tells us that we can use a matrix box.

I hope that this helps others to more quickly recognize that a matrix box or double matrix will be useful on questions like these.

How do I immediately see that the following matrix is not sufficient? I though I had enough equations to solve for B Bunuel?

_________________

Plug some numbers there: if x = 0, then B = 75 but if x = 10, then B = 85.
_________________

254. George has a total of B books in his library, 25 of which are hardcover fiction books. What is the value of B ?
(1) 40 of the B books are fiction and the rest are nonfiction.
(2) 60 of the B books are hardcovers and the rest are paperbacks.

This question from OG'18 has been solved using Venn Diagram in the OG, whereas the CrackVerbal Quant course says you can't solve for mutually exclusive categories with Venn Diagram. Is that a matter of choice or a rule? I know they have tried and pick non-exclusive categories to represent a Venn Diagram but is that even suggested?

Hello Shekhar,

For data that is mutually exclusive, drawing a table is the most optimal way of solving the problem. Drawing a Venn diagram for mutually exclusive events is pointless; the whole idea of drawing a Venn diagram is to work with the common regions. If data is mutually exclusive, you will not have any overlap of the circles and hence the advice to draw a table. However, it’s not a mandate. You can still draw a Venn diagram and answer the question.
I shall demonstrate both the approaches for you.

Using the table method, we can draw up a table like the ones below:

From statement I alone, we do not know the number of non-fiction books. Hence, insufficient.



From statement II alone, we do not know the split of the paperbacks. Insufficient.



The individual statements are insufficient since they do not provide us with enough information to fill up all the cells in the table and hence insufficient to find a value for B.

When we combine the statements also, you can see that we are unable to fill all the cells and there is still information needed about the Non-fiction paperback books to be able to find the value of B.



The combination of statements is also insufficient.

As you can see, the Venn diagrams approach is cumbersome because you need to draw multiple diagrams while testing the individual statements. We can draw the following Venn diagrams:



Using statement I alone, we see that we do not have information about the non-fiction books.



Using statement II alone, we see that we do not have information about the paperbacks.



Combining both statements, we see that we don’t have information about the Non-fiction paperbacks.



Since the combination of statements is insufficient to answer the question, the correct answer option is E

As I mentioned earlier, you CAN draw Venn diagrams to solve questions related to mutually exclusive data. But, its probably not the most optimal method in terms of time and effort, that is why we recommend drawing up a table.

Hope that helps!
_________________

Answer: Option E

Video solution by GMATinsight



Get TOPICWISE: Concept Videos | Practice Qns 100+ | Official Qns 50+ | 100% Video solution CLICK HERE.
Two MUST join YouTube channels : GMATinsight (1000+ FREE Videos) and GMATclub

Answer: Option E

Video solution by GMATinsight



Get TOPICWISE: Concept Videos | Practice Qns 100+ | Official Qns 50+ | 100% Video solution CLICK HERE.
Two MUST join YouTube channels : GMATinsight (1000+ FREE Videos) and GMATclub

Solution:

Question Stem Analysis:

We need to determine the value of B, the number of books in George’s library. (Note: Here we are assuming all the books in George are either fiction or nonfiction, and either hardcover or paperback.)

Statement One Alone:

Since 40 books are fiction books and 25 are hardcover fiction books, 40 - 25 = 15 books are paperback fiction books. However, we can’t determine the value of B, the number of books in George’s library. Statement one alone is not sufficient.

Statement Two Alone:

Since 60 books are hardcovers and 25 are hardcover fiction books, 60 - 25 = 35 books are hardcover nonfiction books. However, we can’t determine the value of B, the number of books in George’s library. Statement two alone is not sufficient.

Statements One and Two Together:

From the two statements, we can see that there are 25 hardcover fiction books, 15 paperback fiction books, and 35 hardcover nonfiction books. However, since we still don’t know the number of paperback nonfiction books, we can’t determine the value of B, the number of books in George’s library. Both statements together are still not sufficient.

Answer: E
_________________

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________