Bunuel wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Nearly 20 genera of electric fish are classified in the Mormyridae taxon, which includes 203 different species, more than all the other taxons of electric fish combined.
(A) Nearly 20 genera of electric fish are classified in the Mormyridae taxon, which includes 203 different species, more than all the other taxons of electric fish combined.
(B) With 203 deferent species, that is more than all the other taxons of electric fish combined, the Mormyridae taxon has nearly 20 genera of electric fish that are classified in it.
(C) The Mormyridae taxon, with nearly 20 genera of electric fish are classified in it, it includes more different species than all the other taxons of electric fish combined, 203.
(D) While nearly 20 genera of electric fish are classified in it, the Mormyridae taxon includes 203 different species, which is more than all the other taxons of electric fish combined.
(E) More than all the other taxons of electric fish combined, the Mormyridae taxon, with nearly 20 genera of electric fish classified in it, includes 203 different species.
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
A
Not only is the entire sentence underlined, but a glance at the choices reveals that there are no clear patterns to help you eliminate multiple choices at once. The initial sentence looks good: the taxon includes a number of species, which is more than the other taxons. There are multiple modifiers, and they appear to modify the right things.
(B) has extraneous language, such as "that is" following the first comma. Also, the concluding "classified in it" is awkward. (C) has a phrase you can read around, leaving you with "The Mormyridae taxon it includes. . . " which is clearly wrong.
(D) has an extraneous "which is", as well as the "classified in it" that was awkward in (B). Also, it implies a contrast ("While. . . "), though there is no apparent contrast between the number of genera and the number of species. (E) repeats the awkward "classified in it", and separates the "203 different species" from "more than all the other. . ." Those two facts are related (and are adjacent in the initial sentence), making this construction much less clear.
Requesting experts to help me with following doubt:
(A) Nearly 20 genera of electric fish are classified in the Mormyridae taxon, which includes 203 different species, more than all the other taxons of electric fish combined.
My understanding: We can rephrase the sentence in two ways
1-Nearly 20 genera of electric fish are classified in the Mormyridae taxon, more than all the other taxons of electric fish combined.
(We can eliminate which clause as it is non essential)
So the classification of 20 genera of elect fish in M taxon is more than all other taxons' classifcaton.
2-Nearly 20 genera of electric fish are classified in the Mormyridae taxon, which includes 203 different species, more than all the other taxons of electric fish combined.
Here M taxon includes 203 species, more than all other taxons of elect fish combined.
Since i found two meanings from the option A i eliminated it.
In E why the "classified in it" is wrong?