Hemanthdasu13 wrote:
I just wanted to know if my thinking is spot on or am i just overthinking.
Every now and then I've seen lot of GMAT aspirants especially Indians put lot of emphasis on sentence correction.
IMO RC should play a key role since one bad RC can really hurt your chances. SC questions are anyway scattered and it's risk is - lets say diversified.
I used to literally hate social sciences and all those topics about humanities, philosophy etc. But with lot of effort I'm starting to increase my accuracy.
This might be just a start to ensure there's no so called ” bad RC day"
Also want to know why it's so neglected by so many aspirants given that it has more number of questions as well.
Bunuel GMATNinja VeritasKarishma ChiranjeevSingh bb NikhilSajjad1994Posted from my mobile deviceSC gives you maximum ROI in terms of effort put in during prep as well as during the actual exam. It's easier to improve in SC since most questions test from a defined set of errors (tenses, SV agreement, parallelism, modifiers etc). Once you get a hang of how to choose the best available option, your accuracy improves a whole lot. Often, decision points help you answer each SC question in under a minute. So it gives you the biggest bang for your buck, so to say.
Improving in RC, on the other hand, is a slow, tedious process. That doesn't mean it cannot be done but a period of 2-3 months is certainly not enough to make a marked difference. What helps is a lot of regular reading (it helps with SC too) on every conceivable topic, and still, what you get may be totally out of your comfort zone. Yes, RC is extremely important and understanding the question types helps, but it is a life skill you build over years.