1) are touch screen-only phones have screens 8 cm or larger
2) are purchased without a service contract
3) are available at a discounted price with a service contract
4) are packaged with fewer than two accessories
Among all four statements, the one with service warranty can't be used as we don't know which of the mobile phone is more (more than 8cm screen size or less than 8cm screen size)
Statement 2: We know most are sold with service contract. So second statement is invalid because we have contradictory information as such given in passage.
Statement 3 : are available at a discounted price with a service contract. Let say this is the first statement what could be fewer than half in the other statement? Has fewer than 2 accessories? But what kind of phone it is? Information gap is in there.
Are touch screen phone with 8cm screen or larger. But are they the least? Keypad ones could be in least number. No determining factor.
Hence statement 3 is invalid.
Among last two, 1&4 statement.
We can't use the statement "are packed with fewer than 2 accessories. What is packed? Which type?
Hence first statement has to statement 1, and later is statement 4
Now checking validity. We know the shops have both phones. Some are 8cm screen touch phones rest are other. We don't have to check quantity, hence valid.
Fewer than half have less than two accessories, is valid because it's stated that most are packed with two accessories.
Hence the answer is,
of those that "are touch screen-only phones have screens 8 cm or larger", fewer than half "are packaged with fewer than two accessories".
P.S.
SajjadAhmad kindly edit the OA, the statement 1 is til 8cm or larger.
Thank you.
Posted from my mobile device _________________