Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 02:04 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 02:04

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: 555-605 Levelx   Grammatical/Rhetorical Constructionx   Pronounsx                        
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Jul 2021
Posts: 233
Own Kudos [?]: 48 [1]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
CEO
CEO
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 3675
Own Kudos [?]: 3528 [1]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Aug 2021
Posts: 82
Own Kudos [?]: 73 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Location: India
GPA: 3.44
Send PM
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63650 [0]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has [#permalink]
Expert Reply
sarthakaggarwal wrote:
HI GMATNinja egmat

I've one doubt
Kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits
I know that "that" normally refers to the immediate noun before it but here "kind of" is acting as a preposition phrase so shouldn't kind(singular) should refer to limits

When you're evaluating a "that" or a "which" modifier, all you're asking yourself is whether there's a reasonably close noun or noun phrase that the modifier could be logically describing. If there is, don't treat it as an error. It's that simple.

In (D), we see the following phrase:

Quote:
the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit the spread of this species in its native Argentina.

Here, the closest eligible noun, "struggles" makes perfect sense. What's limiting the spread of this species? A certain type of "struggles." That works. (Note, again: even if "that" weren't touching "struggles," the construction could be acceptable, so long as the two were reasonably close.)

At this point, you'd conclude the "that" is fine in this option and move on to other issues.

I hope that clears things up!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Aug 2021
Posts: 82
Own Kudos [?]: 73 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Location: India
GPA: 3.44
Send PM
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has [#permalink]
GMATNinja wrote:
sarthakaggarwal wrote:
HI GMATNinja egmat

I've one doubt
Kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits
I know that "that" normally refers to the immediate noun before it but here "kind of" is acting as a preposition phrase so shouldn't kind(singular) should refer to limits

When you're evaluating a "that" or a "which" modifier, all you're asking yourself is whether there's a reasonably close noun or noun phrase that the modifier could be logically describing. If there is, don't treat it as an error. It's that simple.

In (D), we see the following phrase:

Quote:
the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit the spread of this species in its native Argentina.

Here, the closest eligible noun, "struggles" makes perfect sense. What's limiting the spread of this species? A certain type of "struggles." That works. (Note, again: even if "that" weren't touching "struggles," the construction could be acceptable, so long as the two were reasonably close.)

At this point, you'd conclude the "that" is fine in this option and move on to other issues.

I hope that clears things up!

Thank you so much for the reply
So basically you are saying that since "struggles" make perfect sense with "limit the spread" and its closest to "that" , so that will modify struggles and not kind of
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63650 [0]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has [#permalink]
Expert Reply
sarthakaggarwal wrote:
GMATNinja wrote:
sarthakaggarwal wrote:
HI GMATNinja egmat

I've one doubt
Kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits
I know that "that" normally refers to the immediate noun before it but here "kind of" is acting as a preposition phrase so shouldn't kind(singular) should refer to limits

When you're evaluating a "that" or a "which" modifier, all you're asking yourself is whether there's a reasonably close noun or noun phrase that the modifier could be logically describing. If there is, don't treat it as an error. It's that simple.

In (D), we see the following phrase:

Quote:
the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit the spread of this species in its native Argentina.

Here, the closest eligible noun, "struggles" makes perfect sense. What's limiting the spread of this species? A certain type of "struggles." That works. (Note, again: even if "that" weren't touching "struggles," the construction could be acceptable, so long as the two were reasonably close.)

At this point, you'd conclude the "that" is fine in this option and move on to other issues.

I hope that clears things up!

Thank you so much for the reply
So basically you are saying that since "struggles" make perfect sense with "limit the spread" and its closest to "that" , so that will modify struggles and not kind of

Yep! Just don't worry too much about what noun is closest to "that."

Obviously, if "that" is touching a noun it can logically modify, it's fine, but if there's a short phrase between "that" and what it seems to describe, that can be perfectly acceptable, too.

The takeaway: there's no rule that tells us exactly where the noun should be in relation to "that." It just needs to be in the vicinity.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Nov 2021
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 27 [0]
Given Kudos: 39
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
WE:Analyst (Other)
Send PM
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has [#permalink]
Hi GMATNinja daagh
With respect to this question, in all 5 choices, can you help explain the use of 'due to' vs 'because of'
I know that 'due to' is used to modify noun and 'because of' is used to modify verbs/ phrases but i am not able to understand how to check which word/ phrase is being modified in each of the 5 answer choices to then see if it is a noun / verb or a phrase
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Posts: 233
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 139
Send PM
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has [#permalink]
Dear experts,

"because it is so genetically similar".. It should be either A "similar to" B or they are similar (it should be plural because we are trying to compare)

Can I eliminate (C) by this reason?
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Tanchat wrote:
Dear experts,

"because it is so genetically similar".. It should be either A "similar to" B or they are similar (it should be plural because we are trying to compare)

Can I eliminate (C) by this reason?


Hello Tanchat,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, yes; Option C can be eliminated for the use of the phrase "because it is so genetically similar, the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative"; the use of the singular pronoun "it", the noun "the ant", and the phrase "a close relative" illogically implies that the species the Argentine Ant considers all its fellows a singular close relative; the intended meaning is that all individual Argentine ants consider all their fellows an individual close relation.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global team
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 19 Jul 2022
Posts: 430
Own Kudos [?]: 507 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Send PM
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Tanchat wrote:
Dear experts,

"because it is so genetically similar".. It should be either A "similar to" B or they are similar (it should be plural because we are trying to compare)

Can I eliminate (C) by this reason?


If you're pointing out that it makes no sense for just one thing to be "similar", then, yes! That's a valid, and quite perceptive, reason for elimination.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Jul 2022
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 48
WE:Engineering (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has [#permalink]
I did not consider that the ants referred later in the sentence can he replaced by pronoun.Question starts with the Argentine ant , hence I looked for only options that has its. Corrective action :
When two sentences are separated by semicolon .Even if there is a singular pronoun used in 1st sentence .There can be plural references in the next sentences in there is a plural noun is present .
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has [#permalink]
   1   2   3   4 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne