NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 12:35 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 12:35
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
   1   2   3   
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
L
CrackverbalGMAT
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7627 [3]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   15 Oct 2020, 06:29
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Top Contributor
burnttwinky wrote:
Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively easy task, because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach for anybody with a pan or shovel.


(A) because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach for

(B) because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of

(C) owing to erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that had thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of

(D) since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, putting gold literally within reach for

(E) since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach of


This question is based on Sentence Structure and Parallelism.

A) because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach for
The preposition ‘for’ is incorrect after the phrase “within reach”. The correct usage is ‘within reach of’.
This option lacks the relative pronoun ‘that’, which would connect the first part of the sentence to the second. So, the option should have been as following –
because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity that put gold literally within reach for
For these two reasons, Option A can be eliminated.

B)because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of
The intended meaning of the sentence is that prospecting for gold during the California Gold rush was relatively easy because of certain things that put gold within reach of anybody with a pan or shovel.
The construction of Option B conveys the meaning that prospecting for gold was easy because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, volcanic activity, and putting gold within reach…. However, the intended meaning is that the first three things put gold within reach of anybody with a pan or shovel. If erosion, prehistoric glacier movement etc. are part of a list, there is a lack of parallelism in this option as ‘putting’ is not parallel to the rest of the items in the list. So, Option B can be eliminated.

C) owing to erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that had thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of
Option C corrects the error in Option B by introducing the relative pronoun ‘that’. However, such a construction requires ‘thrust’ and ‘putting’ to be parallel to each other, which they are not in this option.
So, Option C can be eliminated.

D) since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, putting gold literally within reach for
Option D contains the same idiomatic error as Option A. The placement of the relative pronoun ‘that’ and the participle ‘putting’ make Option D a sentence fragment. So, Option D also can be ruled out.

E) since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach of
This option has the verb ‘put’ for the subject “erosion, prehistoric glacier movement and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity”. The phrase “thrust to the surface by volcanic activity” modifies the noun, ‘riverbeds’. The idiomatic error in Options A and D has also been corrected in this option. Therefore, E is the most appropriate option.

Jayanthi Kumar.
avatar
B
Vivek1707
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 May 2020
Posts: 19
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 104
Send PM
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   08 Jul 2021, 20:50
daagh wrote:
While structuring sentences, the Take- Away is:


A. Simple sentences contain a single main clause with a subject and a finite verb; any modifier that may follow is not going to be a clause. It can be a prepositional phrase (because of, owing to, etc,) followed by a noun or noun phrase. Any finite verb such as ‘put’ will be wrong, while a participle such as putting or helped by is permitted ‘and putting’ is unacceptable. In short, the template of a simple sentence is: main clause with Sub+ verb) plus an optional prepositional or participial modifier.

Example:
1. Dhoni is a successful captain, because of his winning of important matches somehow
2. Dhoni is a successful captain, winning important matches somehow

B. Complex sentences have not only a main clause with a subject and finite verb, but also a subordinate clause connected by a subordinate conjunction such as since, because, although etc. These subordinate clauses do have a finite verb such as ‘put’; However ‘and putting’ is not permitted since - and putting- is not a finite verb. The template is: a main clause (subject cum verb) plus a subordinate clause (a subordinate conjunction plus a subject (may be skipped sometimes) and compulsorily a finite verb’.
1. Dhoni is a successful captain, who is able to win important matches somehow
2. Since Dhoni is able to win important matches somehow, he is India’s most successful captain.

C. The third category is the compound sentence consisting of two independent sentences with a subject and a mandatory finite verb of each own, (although the subject may be skipped sometimes to avoid redundancy).

Example: Dhoni is a successful captain and he is able to win important matches

In the light of the above, perhaps the text in question may be understood, although it is neither a match nor an alternative to what people like Parker have elucidated. For those who want a more basic sermon, here is a file of mine that might give you a glimpse of this concept.


Hi daagh

Thank you for the amazing explanation, just wanted to confirm - In option B if instead of 'and putting' only putting was mentioned after a comma, would that sentence also be correct ?
User avatar
S
Poojita
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Dec 2019
Posts: 73
Own Kudos [?]: 43 [0]
Given Kudos: 659
Location: India
Schools: LBS MFA "23
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   31 Jul 2021, 12:33
abhimahna wrote:
pikolo2510 wrote:
I really didn't get how option E is correct. According to previous posts, there 3 things parallel in Option E

X = erosion
Y = prehistoric glacier movement
Z = ancient

As X and Y are nouns, Z also has to be a noun to be parallel

But here "ancient" is used an adjective. How can this be parallel? I'm really confused with the parallelism here.


Hey pikolo2510 ,

Z in your parallel structure is "ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface" rather than just ancient. Ancient is an adjective modifying the riverbeds.

Hence, E is correct.

Does that make sense?


Hi
Isn't 'thrust' a noun here?
I could not understand the parallelism in this case i.e option E
Quote:
since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach of


X, Y and Z
X= noun=erosion
Y= noun = prehistoric glacier movement
Z= noun = gold-bearing riverbeds
Now all these "thrust" to the surface but it doesnt make sense because erosion cant thrust to the surface and same with prehistoric glacier movement.
And if "thrust" is the verb for X,Y and Z then what is the subject for put?
If Z=ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity = clause
in this case, how is the parallelism correct ? how can we put two nouns parallel with a clause?
Am I missing something?
User avatar
S
Poojita
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Dec 2019
Posts: 73
Own Kudos [?]: 43 [0]
Given Kudos: 659
Location: India
Schools: LBS MFA "23
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   31 Jul 2021, 13:04
GMATNinja wrote:
Setback wrote:
Can anyone explain the role of thrust and put in the correct answer choice?
Which one is the main verb between the two ?

What makes this distinction tricky is that “thrust” can function as both a verb and a modifier. Take some silly examples: “Knowing she didn’t have much time to dispose of the evidence, Amy thrust her shovel into the ground with great force and efficiency.” Here “thrust” is a verb – it’s the action Amy is performing.

But “thrust” can also be used as a modifier. “The shovel thrust into the ground broke when it collided with the surprisingly shallow coffin.” Now “thrust” is a modifier describing the shovel. Which shovel? The one thrust into the ground. It’s the presence of the verb “broke” that helps clue us in to the fact that “thrust” plays a different role here.

The OA for this question is more like the second of the two above examples.

Quote:
Erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach of

“Thrust” is a modifier describing the riverbeds. Which “riverbeds?” The ones thrust to the surface by volcanic activity.

“Put” is the main verb of the sentence, the action performed by erosion, glacier movement, and those aforementioned riverbeds.

I hope that helps!

Hi GMATNinja
The second use of 'thrust' as a modifier is still confusing
The shovel thrust into the ground broke when it collided with the surprisingly shallow coffin
I am not able to understand the meaning of this sentence and moreover I dont know how to distinguish if a verb in its base form is used as a modifier or its an error since thrust does'nt have a subject
User avatar
P
DmitryFarber
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [2]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   31 Jul 2021, 16:11
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Poojita

Unfortunately, there's no easy way to deal with that difficulty. Past participles (past forms of verbs) often appear as modifiers, and there's not a simple rule for determining the intended usage. Generally, though, we should try to find the author's intended sentence core (subject, verb, etc.), and see if that makes sense. Then, if some other word such as "thrust" or an -ed word can work as a modifier, then it's okay. In other words, we should do our best to read the choice as if it makes sense, and eliminate if there's no way to interpret the words that would produce a valid sentence.

Here are a few good cases with "extra" past participles to practice on:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-first-tr ... 25551.html

https://gmatclub.com/forum/paleontologi ... 37585.html

https://gmatclub.com/forum/fossils-of-t ... 77781.html
User avatar
S
Poojita
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Dec 2019
Posts: 73
Own Kudos [?]: 43 [0]
Given Kudos: 659
Location: India
Schools: LBS MFA "23
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   31 Jul 2021, 22:45
DmitryFarber wrote:
Poojita

Unfortunately, there's no easy way to deal with that difficulty. Past participles (past forms of verbs) often appear as modifiers, and there's not a simple rule for determining the intended usage. Generally, though, we should try to find the author's intended sentence core (subject, verb, etc.), and see if that makes sense. Then, if some other word such as "thrust" or an -ed word can work as a modifier, then it's okay. In other words, we should do our best to read the choice as if it makes sense, and eliminate if there's no way to interpret the words that would produce a valid sentence.

Here are a few good cases with "extra" past participles to practice on:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-first-tr ... 25551.html

https://gmatclub.com/forum/paleontologi ... 37585.html

https://gmatclub.com/forum/fossils-of-t ... 77781.html


Thanks alot DmitryFarber!!! for the response
User avatar
B
aanya2000
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2021
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
Schools: LBS MFA "23 (II)
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.44
WE:Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   21 Oct 2021, 13:30
Isn't because of preferred on the gmat?
User avatar
P
TheGraceful
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2018
Posts: 342
Own Kudos [?]: 200 [0]
Given Kudos: 217
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
Schools: Booth Wharton Kellogg LBS '24 INSEAD Jan'24 intake
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
GPA: 3.56
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   22 Oct 2021, 01:29
aanya2000 wrote:
Isn't because of preferred on the gmat?


No, there is no such hard rule.
On GMAT you need to choose BEST answer among options given. (OR it can be said as better among five choices and NOT the perfect one).
User avatar
S
Will2020
Current Student
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Posts: 146
Own Kudos [?]: 44 [0]
Given Kudos: 1120
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: Fuqua '24 (A)
GPA: 3.2
WE:Consulting (Health Care)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   10 Feb 2022, 12:10
burnttwinky wrote:
Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively easy task, because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach for anybody with a pan or shovel.


(A) because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach for

(B) because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of

(C) owing to erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that had thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of

(D) since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, putting gold literally within reach for

(E) since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach of


Hi KarishmaB DmitryFarber! In C, is the construction "owing to erosion..." wrong? Also, is the use of "had" in the phrase "and volcanic activity that had thrust ancient" right? In addition, in terms of meaning, the use of "because of" in A and B is not the intended meaning, right? Thank you! :please:
User avatar
L
KarishmaB
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14823
Own Kudos [?]: 64919 [2]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   10 Feb 2022, 22:35
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Will2020 wrote:
burnttwinky wrote:
Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively easy task, because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach for anybody with a pan or shovel.


(A) because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach for

(B) because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of

(C) owing to erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that had thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of

(D) since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, putting gold literally within reach for

(E) since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach of


Hi KarishmaB DmitryFarber! In C, is the construction "owing to erosion..." wrong? Also, is the use of "had" in the phrase "and volcanic activity that had thrust ancient" right? In addition, in terms of meaning, the use of "because of" in A and B is not the intended meaning, right? Thank you! :please:


"owing to" is used in place of "because of" or "on account of" but here all of these are incorrect.

Prospecting for gold was easy not because of erosion but because erosion had put gold within reach. So we are looking for another clause that explains the reason why prospecting was easy. The nouns "erosion", "glacier movement" and "volcanic activity" are not the reason prospecting was easy. They do not help us understand why prospecting was easy.

We need to say that it was easy because (or since) erosion, glacier movement and gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface put gold within reach.
User avatar
B
dmohitprasad
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 May 2021
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 79
Send PM
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   10 Aug 2022, 22:33
GMATNinja AndrewN egmat
Still cannot wrap my head around the approach to solve this problem:
(B) because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of
(E) since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach of

I chose B, my first step was to identify the correct list of 3 parallel elements.
first option: erosion || prehistoric glacier movement || volcanic activity
second option: erosion || prehistoric glacier movement || riverbeds
the main reason to drop the second option was the phrase: gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity.
I did not understand the usage of to the surface here and volcanic activity looked similar to the gerunds previously used (erosion, glacier movement)
User avatar
L
AjiteshArun
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5181
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [3]
Given Kudos: 631
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   11 Aug 2022, 00:12
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
dmohitprasad wrote:
GMATNinja AndrewN egmat
Still cannot wrap my head around the approach to solve this problem:
(B) because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of
(E) since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach of

I chose B, my first step was to identify the correct list of 3 parallel elements.
first option: erosion || prehistoric glacier movement || volcanic activity
second option: erosion || prehistoric glacier movement || riverbeds
the main reason to drop the second option was the phrase: gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity.
I did not understand the usage of to the surface here and volcanic activity looked similar to the gerunds previously used (erosion, glacier movement)

Hi dmohitprasad,

In "riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity", thrust to the surface by volcanic activity is a modifier. We can read that part of option E like this: "riverbeds that were thrust to the surface by volcanic activity". As for B, there are multiple issues here, but one way to take B out is to focus on the intended meaning. This is what option E says:
1. Prospecting was a relatively easy task since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds put gold literally within reach...

On the other hand, this is what the sentence tells us if we choose option B:
2. Prospecting was a relatively easy task because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity...

We don't want to say something like "prospecting was easy because of erosion". Instead, what we want to say is that prospecting was easy because (or since) erosion put gold within reach (of...).
User avatar
L
ExpertsGlobal5
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   12 Aug 2022, 04:37
Expert Reply
dmohitprasad wrote:
GMATNinja AndrewN egmat
Still cannot wrap my head around the approach to solve this problem:
(B) because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of
(E) since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach of

I chose B, my first step was to identify the correct list of 3 parallel elements.
first option: erosion || prehistoric glacier movement || volcanic activity
second option: erosion || prehistoric glacier movement || riverbeds
the main reason to drop the second option was the phrase: gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity.
I did not understand the usage of to the surface here and volcanic activity looked similar to the gerunds previously used (erosion, glacier movement)


Hello dmohitprasad,

We hope this finds you well.

To provide a bit more clarity, the phrase "thrust to the surface by volcanic activity" simply means that the volcanic activity pushed the riverbeds from below the ground to the surface of the Earth.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
L
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63668 [1]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   13 Aug 2022, 07:15
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
dmohitprasad wrote:
GMATNinja AndrewN egmat
Still cannot wrap my head around the approach to solve this problem:
(B) because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of
(E) since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach of

I chose B, my first step was to identify the correct list of 3 parallel elements.
first option: erosion || prehistoric glacier movement || volcanic activity
second option: erosion || prehistoric glacier movement || riverbeds
the main reason to drop the second option was the phrase: gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity.
I did not understand the usage of to the surface here and volcanic activity looked similar to the gerunds previously used (erosion, glacier movement)

Looks like AjiteshArun has you covered nicely, but here are a couple of other thoughts:

dmohitprasad wrote:
the main reason to drop the second option was the phrase: gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity.

A riverbed is at the bottom of the river (below the water). It would be hard to get to gold in a riverbed at the bottom of a river! But volcanic activity thrust those gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface -- and since those riverbeds were no longer underwater, it was easy to get the gold.

(B) also has a more glaring parallelism issue: "and putting gold literally within reach of anybody with a pan or shovel" isn't logically parallel to anything else in the sentence, so (B) has to go.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
B
himanshu0123
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2016
Posts: 191
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 101
Send PM
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   19 Aug 2022, 02:28
in E] are we saying that

erosion and prehistoric glacier movement thrust to the surface!

I am unable to make sense out of it. Please help
User avatar
B
RonTargetTestPrep
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 19 Jul 2022
Posts: 430
Own Kudos [?]: 507 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Send PM
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   21 Aug 2022, 13:08
Expert Reply
himanshu0123 wrote:
in E] are we saying that

erosion and prehistoric glacier movement thrust to the surface!

I am unable to make sense out of it. Please help


Hi,

The correct version of this sentence contains 3 parallel elements (= 3 factors that all contributed to putting gold within the reach of prospectors with only primitive equipment):
• erosion
• prehistoric glacier movement
• ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity ("thrust to the surface"... is a modifier of "riverbeds". There's no such word as "thrusted"; it's just "thrust", an irregular form.)
User avatar
S
woohoo921
Director
Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Posts: 552
Own Kudos [?]: 67 [0]
Given Kudos: 626
Send PM
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   30 Dec 2022, 07:59
CrackverbalGMAT wrote:
burnttwinky wrote:
Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively easy task, because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach for anybody with a pan or shovel.


(A) because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach for

(B) because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of

(C) owing to erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that had thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of

(D) since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, putting gold literally within reach for

(E) since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach of


This question is based on Sentence Structure and Parallelism.

A) because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach for
The preposition ‘for’ is incorrect after the phrase “within reach”. The correct usage is ‘within reach of’.
This option lacks the relative pronoun ‘that’, which would connect the first part of the sentence to the second. So, the option should have been as following –
because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity that put gold literally within reach for
For these two reasons, Option A can be eliminated.

B)because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of
The intended meaning of the sentence is that prospecting for gold during the California Gold rush was relatively easy because of certain things that put gold within reach of anybody with a pan or shovel.
The construction of Option B conveys the meaning that prospecting for gold was easy because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, volcanic activity, and putting gold within reach…. However, the intended meaning is that the first three things put gold within reach of anybody with a pan or shovel. If erosion, prehistoric glacier movement etc. are part of a list, there is a lack of parallelism in this option as ‘putting’ is not parallel to the rest of the items in the list. So, Option B can be eliminated.

C) owing to erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that had thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of
Option C corrects the error in Option B by introducing the relative pronoun ‘that’. However, such a construction requires ‘thrust’ and ‘putting’ to be parallel to each other, which they are not in this option.
So, Option C can be eliminated.

D) since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, putting gold literally within reach for
Option D contains the same idiomatic error as Option A. The placement of the relative pronoun ‘that’ and the participle ‘putting’ make Option D a sentence fragment. So, Option D also can be ruled out.

E) since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach of
This option has the verb ‘put’ for the subject “erosion, prehistoric glacier movement and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity”. The phrase “thrust to the surface by volcanic activity” modifies the noun, ‘riverbeds’. The idiomatic error in Options A and D has also been corrected in this option. Therefore, E is the most appropriate option.

Jayanthi Kumar.


CrackverbalGMAT
I don't understand why you need a "that" in Choice A but not in Choice E.
User avatar
P
DmitryFarber
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [0]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   30 Dec 2022, 19:06
Expert Reply
woohoo921

A and E have very different structures. BECAUSE OF in A introduces a list of nouns: erosion, movement, and riverbeds. THRUST then creates a modifier for riverbeds. But then PUT has no function. There's no subject to match with this verb. It would be like saying "I won because of the shortcut put me ahead of the others." I can cut OF ("I won because the shortcut put me ahead") or I need to put THAT. "I won because of the shortcut." What shortcut? "The shortcut that put me ahead." As it is, we're mixing and matching. Prospecting was easy because of this list of things, but then we're trying to turn one of the things into a clause (with a verb).

E, on the other hand, uses SINCE to introduce a clause. (It could just as well have said BECAUSE, just not BECAUSE OF). Prospecting was easy. Why? Because erosion, movement, and riverbeds put gold within reach. Since this is a clause, it would be wrong to use THAT and turn our verb into a modifier.
User avatar
B
Jatin108
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Apr 2015
Posts: 33
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 39
Location: India
Schools: Wharton '26 Columbia CBS'26
GMAT 1: 690 Q46 V38
Send PM
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   12 Feb 2023, 23:57
Hi can someone explain me the real meaning of this sentence, how is anciet, gold bearing riverbed and erosion are comparable? in my view erosion and glacier movement are still comparable to volcanic activity. really having a hard time
User avatar
L
KarishmaB
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14823
Own Kudos [?]: 64919 [2]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink] New post   13 Feb 2023, 21:27
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Jatin108 wrote:
Hi can someone explain me the real meaning of this sentence, how is anciet, gold bearing riverbed and erosion are comparable? in my view erosion and glacier movement are still comparable to volcanic activity. really having a hard time


Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively easy task, since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach of anybody with a pan or shovel.

'Prospecting for gold' means looking for gold. Normally, mineral natural resources are dug out from deep within the Earth. You and me cannot look for gold, silver, mica etc on barren land and hope to find it.
But during the California gold rush time, finding gold was easy. It was almost on the surface so anybody with a shovel could dig out gold from the soil.
How did it come to the surface? Because erosion (top layer of the Earth was eroded), glacier movements and gold bearing river beds present on the surface caused the gold to be easily accessible.

The volcanic activities caused ancient gold bearing river beds to be thrust to the surface. Normally you would expect river beds to be quite deep.

The parallel elements:
erosion put gold literally within reach of anybody...
prehistoric glacier movement put gold literally within reach of anybody...
ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach of anybody...

The 3 highlighted are in parallel.
'thrust to the surface by volcanic activity' modifies 'ancient gold-bearing riverbeds'

e.g.
The kindness of the server, the dance movements and the song written by my sister made my evening very pleasant.

The highlighted are nouns in parallel. The nouns have modifiers before or after them.
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively [#permalink]
13 Feb 2023, 21:27
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions