Two types of fuels, Bio X and Bio Y, both made from natural resources, are increasingly being used by vehicles around the country. Recent tests indicate that the complete combustion of a volume of Bio Y releases fewer pollutants in the air than the complete combustion of an equal volume of Bio X. Since both the government and the people of the country are determined to bring down the pollution levels in the long run, it can be expected that in 30 years from now, a significant number of cars will use only Bio Y.
Which of the following would be most useful to evaluate the argument’s conclusion?
(A) Whether the vehicles that currently use Bio X can also use Bio YNot necessary, even if they are not able to a significant number of new vehicles can be added to the road running on fuel Y.
(B) Whether the present day cars that run on Bio Y consume less fuel than the cars that run on Bio X to cover the same distanceComparison has been done with pollutants released per volume of X and Y, hence B becomes irrelevant. This option would have been significant if the comparison wasn't done per volume.
(C) Whether 30 years from now the manufacturers’ profit margin for cars that consume BioY will be significantly higher than the profit margin of cars that consume Bio XProfit margin is not in question here.
(D) Whether the resources used to make Bio Y are sustainable to cater to the demand of the fuel in the next thirty years and beyondEeeeexactly...! What if the resources required to make fuel Y will be over in the span of 30 years, the whole future dream of 30 years and beyond will go crumbling down.
(E) Whether the price of cars that run on BioY will increase in the coming years.Again price is not in question here.
Project CR Butler: Critical Reasoning
For all CR butler Questions Click Here
-Irony of today’s world, Lie is a Truth to represent the Reality.