Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 03:33 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 03:33

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92912
Own Kudos [?]: 618898 [6]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Dec 2020
Posts: 480
Own Kudos [?]: 373 [1]
Given Kudos: 359
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Mar 2023
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Dec 2020
Posts: 480
Own Kudos [?]: 373 [1]
Given Kudos: 359
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
Re: The country of Paisi has generally relied on growing soybeans as an [#permalink]
1
Kudos
gmattyfatty wrote:
Paisi currently grows more non-soy legumes each year than it consumes, and exports of soybeans are in decline, due to competition from suppliers in other nations.

If these trends continue, Paisi's ability to export other legumes is likely to grow in the near future.

Bunuel bv8562 I don't see how, with the above 2 sentences, the answer is D and not E? It makes sense that if any of the Soybean plots have already been converted to growing other legumes, that the "ability to export other legumes is likely to grow". How does the quantity of non-soybean legumes consumed in other countries each year impact Paisi's ability to grow more non-soybean legumes? It only affects impacts their incentive


You misread the conclusion. The conclusion is "If these trends continue, Paisi's ability to EXPORT other legumes is likely to grow in the near future."

We already know from the passage that Paisi currently grows more non-soy legumes each year than it consumes. Non-soy legumes are already in surplus. But for this surplus to be sold in other countries there has to be demand. In fact from the passage we also know that even when Paisi is able to export soybeans, exports of soybeans are still in decline, due to competition from suppliers in other nations. So, in order to evaluate the conclusion we need to evaluate what option D says.

Besides option E says "Have any existing soybean plots in Paisi already been converted to growing other legumes?" But currently we don't care about this because non-soy legumes are already in surplus. First they need to make sure that there is demand for this surplus in other countries. If only they are able to sell this surplus and if there is still more demand for these non-soy legumes then only they will have to think of other solutions. Therefore, option E is not useful in evaluating the argument. That was my reasoning.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92912
Own Kudos [?]: 618898 [0]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: The country of Paisi has generally relied on growing soybeans as an [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Bunuel wrote:
The country of Paisi has generally relied on growing soybeans as an export. Recently, the ministry of agriculture has implemented a system to reduce dependence on this single crop by encouraging farmers to grow other legumes. Paisi currently grows more non-soy legumes each year than it consumes, and exports of soybeans are in decline, due to competition from suppliers in other nations. If these trends continue, Paisi's ability to export other legumes is likely to grow in the near future.

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in evaluating the argument?

A. When, if ever, will the growth of non-soy legumes in Paisi surpass production of soybeans?

B. Is Paisi among the countries that export soybeans most?

C. What proportion of Paisi's agricultural exports consists of crops other than legumes?

D. Is the quantity of non-soybean legumes consumed in other countries each year increasing?

E. Have any existing soybean plots in Paisi already been converted to growing other legumes?



This is a CR Butler Question



Official Explanation



Reading the question: The question stem asks for an assumption. The conclusion is the last sentence. The critical piece of evidence is the preceding sentence; the prior sentences are primarily intro. Paisi has extra legumes to sell; that seems like a good reason why they could export them. Secondarily, the fact that soybeans are in decline is given as a reason. That connection is weaker: is the competition in non-legumes as strong as it is in soybeans? If it is, the argument has a big problem. We'll look for that.

Applying the filter: None of the answer choices address whether the competition in non-legumes as strong as it is in soybeans, but (D) is similar.

Logical proof: We try negating (D): say the quantity of non-soy legumes in other countries was decreasing. Say the amount imported by them was zero! That would destroy the argument. Hence, (D) pertains to a critical assumption and is the correct answer.

The correct answer is (D).
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The country of Paisi has generally relied on growing soybeans as an [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne