G: The group of works exhibited in this year’s Metropolitan Art Show

Hi,

If you carefully read H's assertion he says it's necessary for the all artwork submitted must meet the traditional criteria—and only those works—would be exhibited in the show.

E specifies this fact.

Hope this helps.

Thanks

Posted from my mobile device

Wanted to clarify one thing. G say "Equal numbers of photographers, sculptors, and painters submitted works that met the traditional criteria for the show," The question stem says that both H and G assertion are true. Isn't E contradicting G's statement

A - is a could be true answer -
2nd guy states that ALL ITEMS THAT ARE SUBMITTED AND MET THE CRITERIA ARE DISPLAYED.
according to A = if more photographers have given but very few met the criteria ?

E - states clearly . as we are not worried about no of photographers but no pf photographs met criteria for display .

+kudos if this helped you

this is a disguised resolve the paradox type question

Hi everyone. I got a little confused when I tried to identify the type of this question. I stayed between an assumption and a paradox question. Wich one of them is the type of this question? Or neither of them?

we can have same number of each artist . but each artist can submit many representations meeting the criteria in his field. therefore E is correct.

It is neither of these two types. This is a must be true question as it clearly asks to point out which of the answers "Must be True" IF THE CLAIMS BY BOTH ARE TRUE.

Now I got the catch of this argument.

The number of PH,SC and PA is same. Ok.
But more photos than sculpture and painting.
No biasing.

Means more photos meeting the traditional criteria.
E goes along with above logic.

hey can you plz help me with this question
G say "Equal numbers of photographers, sculptors, and painters submitted works that met the traditional criteria for the show," The question stem says that both H and G assertion are true. Isn't option E contradicting G's statement as option E says that
More works that met the traditional criteria for the Metropolitan Art Show were submitted by photographers than by sculptors or painters but G says the work submitted by photographers, sculptors, and painters were in equal number if they are in equal number than how can more More works that met the traditional criteria were submitted by photographers

The language says that an equal number of PEOPLE from Each of the 3 groups submitted works that met the criteria.

It does NOT say how MANY acceptable works were submitted by EACH PERSON.


So, say we have 5 ppl in each category:

5 photographers

5 sculptors

5 painters


And we are told that the displayed photographs are GREATER than Either the displayed sculptures OR paintings.

And we know that “EVERY piece of work that met the criteria was displayed.”

The only way ALL of these facts can be TRUE at the same time is if the 5 photographers submitted MORE work that met the criteria than the 5 sculptors or 5 painters did.

This is what E tells us.

Posted from my mobile device

Pre-thinking:

We have the following facts presented by G and H:

i) Equal numbers of photographers, sculptors, and painters submitted works that met the traditional criteria.
ii) Each artist was allowed to submit work in one medium only.
iii) All submitted works that met the traditional criteria—and only those works—were exhibited.
iv) More photographs were exhibited than either sculptures or paintings.

All the above statements can be true in only scenario - more photographs meeting the criteria were submitted than either sculptures or paintings. This does not contradict (i) since (i) only talks about the number of photographers, sculptors, and painters, not the number of works submitted by each. Hence, it is possible that an equal number of photographers, sculptors, and painters submitted more photographs than sculptures or paintings (for example, if the average number of photographs submitted per photographer is more than the average number of sculptures submitted per sculptor or average number of paintings submitted per painter.

Let us examine the answer options:


(A) More photographers than sculptors or painters submitted works to be considered for exhibition in the Metropolitan Art Show. This contradicts (i) which is explicitly stated in the stimulus and hence cannot be true. Eliminate.

(B) All the works submitted for the Metropolitan Art Show met the traditional criteria for the show. All the works displayed met the criteria, not all the works submitted. Eliminate.

(C) The quality of photographs exhibited in the metropolitan Art Show was inferior to the quality of the sculptures or paintings exhibited. None of the claims in the stimulus pertain to quality. Eliminate.

(D) Some of the photographs submitted for the Metropolitan Art Show did not meet the traditional criteria for the show. We know that (probably, since the stimulus states "only those works were exhibited") some of the works submitted did not meet the criteria but we cannot be sure that there were some photographs among these. Eliminate.

(E) More works that met the traditional criteria for the Metropolitan Art Show were submitted by photographers than by sculptors or painters. Correct answer and consistent with our pre-thinking.

Hope this helps.

If both G’s assertions and H’s assertion are true, which one of the following must also be true?


(A) More photographers than sculptors or painters submitted works to be considered for exhibition in the Metropolitan Art Show. (The stimulus clearly states that equal number of photographers, sculptors and painters submitted works that met the traditional criteria to be selected. Therefore, this option is wrong.)

(B) All the works submitted for the Metropolitan Art Show met the traditional criteria for the show. (This answer cannot be considered, as it does not give any reason as to why more photographs were displayed compared to paintings and sculptures.)

(C) The quality of photographs exhibited in the metropolitan Art Show was inferior to the quality of the sculptures or paintings exhibited.( If the photographs were of poor quality then they wouldn't have met the traditional which they did according to the stimulus, Wrong answer)

(D) Some of the photographs submitted for the Metropolitan Art Show did not meet the traditional criteria for the show. (irrelevant.)

(E) More works that met the traditional criteria for the Metropolitan Art Show were submitted by photographers than by sculptors or painters. (This is our Answer, as this gives a valid reason as to why most of the works displayed in the exhibition were photographs and not sculptures or paintings.)

The OA is E

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.