Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 00:08 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 00:08

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 771
Own Kudos [?]: 4719 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
 Q49  V35
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 22 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 254
Own Kudos [?]: 3066 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 771
Own Kudos [?]: 4719 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
 Q49  V35
Send PM
Re: With a record number of new companies starting up in [#permalink]
the OA is C. Why? here is the explanation: the argument concluded that Derderia will not break its record for new jobs created ONLY BECAUSE of the one fact that previously established companies will not be adding as many new jobs as such companies did last year. We have no information about the new companies this year, yet the argument thought that the information about the established companies this year is enough to consider the trend of job creations as negative.

hope you guys enjoyed this!
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 22 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: With a record number of new companies starting up in [#permalink]
yeah..the explanation is logical..infact should have spent more time on this one...nice question though !!!
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 771
Own Kudos [?]: 4719 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
 Q49  V35
Send PM
Re: With a record number of new companies starting up in [#permalink]
and the main reason why option b is wrong is that, we are dealing with an assumption question here. assumptions are never stated, so how can you choose an answer choice that is directly written in the text? see what I mean? an answer to the assumption question will never be stated in the argument, otherwise, how can it be assumed? if it is stated in the argument, then it is simply a premise.

hope this helps
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1415
Own Kudos [?]: 308 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: Ann Arbor
Concentration: Health Care Marketing
Schools:Ross '10
Send PM
Re: With a record number of new companies starting up in [#permalink]
For the Quant-minded, here is another way of looking at this CR.

https://www.gmatclub.com/forum/p277619#277619
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: With a record number of new companies starting up in [#permalink]
Why wouldn't A work? I am so bad at these!
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 866
Own Kudos [?]: 6809 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Send PM
Re: With a record number of new companies starting up in [#permalink]
ncprasad wrote:
For the Quant-minded, here is another way of looking at this CR.

p277619#277619


ncprasad,

What is the role of X in the : "Total number of new jobs added this Year=New jobs added in existing companies[Last Year] - X + (Number of new companies)[This Year]*(Number of jobs per new company)[This Year]"

Gradually I understand this question! Many thanks
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1415
Own Kudos [?]: 308 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: Ann Arbor
Concentration: Health Care Marketing
Schools:Ross '10
Send PM
Re: With a record number of new companies starting up in [#permalink]
Wow, this is a blast from the past. Good ole' GMAT days.

The argument says This year, previously established companies will not be adding as many new jobs overall as such companies added last year.

The -X accounts for this decrease. Makes sense?

sondenso wrote:
ncprasad wrote:
For the Quant-minded, here is another way of looking at this CR.

https://www.gmatclub.com/forum/p277619#277619


ncprasad,

What is the role of X in the : "Total number of new jobs added this Year=New jobs added in existing companies[Last Year] - X + (Number of new companies)[This Year]*(Number of jobs per new company)[This Year]"

Gradually I understand this question! Many thanks




Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: With a record number of new companies starting up in [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne