Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 12:06 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 12:06

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 2004
Own Kudos [?]: 1899 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Singapore
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2004
Posts: 106
Own Kudos [?]: 35 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Utrecht
Send PM
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 2004
Own Kudos [?]: 1899 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Singapore
Send PM
Re: OG DS Question - Disagree with OE [#permalink]
Here's what the OE did, which I wasn't entirely convinced.

For statement 1: z > x+y+1

It says statement 1 is not sufficient. What it did was to use x + y + z > 0, so x+y > -z, so that using (1), z > x+y+1>-z+1, impllies z > 0.5. What happens here is it took x+y to be equal to -z and substituted it inside the inequality. But x+y is not equals -z, it is greater than -z. So x+y can be anything, say, -z+1, or -z+20 etc. So if x+y=-z+20, then z > -z+20+1, 2z > 21, z > 21/2 !

For statement 2: x+y<-1, so z>1 for x+y+z>0.

What do you think of the OE for statement (1) ?
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: OG DS Question - Disagree with OE [#permalink]
Statement 1 is insufficient while statement 2 is sufficient.
1) is insufficient cause -
We have x + y + z > 0 given and by 1) z> x + y + 1.

Take x = -.75, y = 0.25 and z = 0.75. We satisfy both the equations.
Yet z<1.
Take x = 1, y = 1 and z =4. We again satisy both equations but z>1

So insufficient.

Mathematical proof.
Add both inequatities - Addition does not change signs.
we get x + y + 2z > x + y + 1
Which is 2z > 1 or z > 1/2

Thus if the question were - is z > 1/2 then answer would be D.
Hope this ends the debate....
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 289
Own Kudos [?]: 344 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: OG DS Question - Disagree with OE [#permalink]
My 1st draft :

1) x+y+z>0 & z>x+y+1

id est 2z>x+y+z+1>1 which means that z>1/2 No

2) x+y+z>0 x+y>-z

id est -z+1 z>1 OK

I would choose answer B



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: OG DS Question - Disagree with OE [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92881 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts
GMAT Tutor
1907 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne