Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 12:38 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 12:38

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: 805+ Levelx   Inferencex            
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Posts: 864
Own Kudos [?]: 4467 [48]
Given Kudos: 221
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 298
Own Kudos [?]: 4561 [27]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
General Discussion
CEO
CEO
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Status: World Rank #4 MBA Admissions Consultant
Posts: 3187
Own Kudos [?]: 1585 [4]
Given Kudos: 33
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Send PM
CEO
CEO
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Status: World Rank #4 MBA Admissions Consultant
Posts: 3187
Own Kudos [?]: 1585 [0]
Given Kudos: 33
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstra [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Hmmm.....ok, if I look at E in the light that it reverses what the last line says then it appears to be incorrect.

i.e. All responsible scientists => new evidence can disprove their theories
is not the same as
Psychologists who believe new evidence can disprove their theories => responsible scientists

In this light, B seems to be better. However, the earlier issue I outlined with B still holds. Tough question, IMO.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 202
Own Kudos [?]: 497 [0]
Given Kudos: 75
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
WE:Consulting (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstra [#permalink]
Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behaviour generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.
Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not responsible psychologist. Dr. Ladlow‟s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Anson‟s argument?

(A) Dr. Ladlow‟s evidence that his theory generates consistently accurate predictions about how rates will perform in a maze is inaccurate. We can't question the validity of premise
(B) Psychologists who can derive consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze from their theories cannot responsibly conclude that those theories cannot be disproved. Within the scope of the para. so, could be correct
(C) No matter how responsible psychologists are, they can never develop correct theoretical explanations. Change of tone by using "never"
(D) Responsible psychologists do not make predictions about how rats will perform in a mazeIswat
(E) Psychologists who accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect are responsible psychologists.
Reversing the Cause & effect.

Therefore, IMO B. It took me 2.3 min to ans this question
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 55
Own Kudos [?]: 56 [1]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstra [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Between B and E, I would go for B... E has a reverse of premises "Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect." ie, responsible Phycologists accepts possibility. But in E it states Phycologists who accepts possibility are responsible.. Its wrong..
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Feb 2012
Status:Perspiring
Posts: 71
Own Kudos [?]: 373 [1]
Given Kudos: 216
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GPA: 3.6
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstra [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I have narrowed down to 2 options B & E.
Among the two I would go with E. It states that :
If Psychologist is responsible -> he/she will accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Mar 2014
Posts: 205
Own Kudos [?]: 138 [0]
Given Kudos: 175
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.19
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstra [#permalink]
I guess correct answer should be E ..
B speaks about pschycologists doing experiment with rats . and E speaks in general about pschycologists .... Is this difference has caused OA to be B ?
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Feb 2014
Posts: 75
Own Kudos [?]: 599 [1]
Given Kudos: 86
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Send PM
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstra [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
adityadon wrote:
I guess correct answer should be E ..
B speaks about pschycologists doing experiment with rats . and E speaks in general about pschycologists .... Is this difference has caused OA to be B ?



Nope. I assume the difference between B and E has been rightly spotted by sheolokesh as quoted:

sheolokesh wrote:
Between B and E, I would go for B... E has a reverse of premises "Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect." ie, responsible Phycologists accepts possibility. But in E it states Phycologists who accepts possibility are responsible.. Its wrong..


This is based on deductive logic i.e. All X are Y...Inference Some Y are X. The reverse All Y are X need not be true unless X=Y

Specifically speaking, just because all responsible psychologists (RP) accept a certain fact (possibility of theories being incorrect), the reverse i.e. all those who accept this fact are RP need not necessarily be true. Hence, eliminate E

Going ahead, before we mark B convincingly, take note of the premises. Ladlow assumes that just because his theory can draw accurate predictions, his theory is correct. This is flawed as there is no concrete reason to assume that 'accuracy in results' and 'correct' are linked. Maybe the sample population of rats used by Ladlow in his experiments are unrepresentative of traits of other rats in general and hence his results are skewed. Moreover, accurate predictions is just a way to describe a trend of observations that are used to make up the experiment, and to claim the correctness of his theory on the basis of a particular trend in observations is definitely not warranted. Maybe, the objective of the theory is to establish that there actually exists uncertainty as to how rats perform in a maze and the observed trend in results is actually doing the opposite!!!Well I know I am kinda stretching this explanation too far :) This overall sentiment is rightly expressed by Anson and summed up in option B, which states that even if a psychologist draws accurate predictions (i.e. he presents a trend) the psycho cannot conclude that his theory cannot be disproved (i.e. the theory may not be correct in an absolute sense)
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Jul 2013
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [1]
Given Kudos: 138
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.7
WE:Business Development (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstra [#permalink]
1
Kudos
(E) is incorrect.

Tall boys play football. This doesn't mean that all boys who play football are tall.
Replace tall boys with responsible psychologist, (E) is in correct.

Now only option left is (B), hence (B) is correct.
SVP
SVP
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1798
Own Kudos [?]: 1367 [1]
Given Kudos: 23
Send PM
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstra [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behaviour generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.

Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not responsible psychologist. Dr. Ladlow's evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Anson's argument?

(A) Dr. Ladlow's evidence that his theory generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze is inaccurate Anson argues that further studies could show that Ladlow's theory is inaccurate. We can't say that he's saying the theory is currently inaccurate.
(B) Psychologists who can derive consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze from their theories cannot responsibly conclude that those theories cannot be disproved This is essentially a paraphrase of the last sentence.
(C) No matter how responsible psychologists are, they can never develop correct theoretical explanations.Responsibility in this discussion pertains to awareness that theoretical explanations can be disproved, not to the ability to produce correct theoretical explanations.
(D) Responsible psychologists do not make predictions about how rats will perform in a maze The importance of responsibility is not related to making or not making predictions about this very specific topic. Responsibility refers to the level of confidence of psychologists in those predictions.
(E) Psychologists who accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect are responsible psychologists.This excludes the possibility that there are other criteria to be considered a responsible psychologist. The original statement implies that this acceptance is part of other characteristics of a responsible psychologist.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Jan 2019
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstra [#permalink]
Marcab wrote:
Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behaviour generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.

Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not responsible psychologist. Dr. Ladlow‟s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Anson's argument?

(A) Dr. Ladlow‟s evidence that his theory generates consistently accurate predictions about how rates will perform in a maze is inaccurate

(B) Psychologists who can derive consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze from their theories cannot responsibly conclude that those theories cannot be disproved

(C) No matter how responsible psychologists are, they can never develop correct theoretical explanations.

(D) Responsible psychologists do not make predictions about how rats will perform in a maze

(E) Psychologists who accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect are responsible psychologists.


This question shows a typical reasoning problem that many people encounter.
Given: A results in B.
WRONG: not A results in not B
CORRECT: not B results in not A

Back to the question: GIVEN: not accepting the possibility (A) -> not responsible (B)
Answer E is implying that not A (accept the possibility) -> not B (responsible). Therefore it's wrong.

The correction answer is B, which basically just paraphrases the given.
Current Student
Joined: 17 May 2020
Posts: 62
Own Kudos [?]: 53 [0]
Given Kudos: 34
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V38
Send PM
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstra [#permalink]
Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behaviour generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.

Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not responsible psychologist. Dr. Ladlow‟s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Anson's argument?

Anson's argument is about Dr. Ladlow only who has drawn consistent prediction about how rats behave in a maze. Dr. Ladlow even with this evidence, if he is responsible, he should accept the possibility that new evidence will disprove this theory.

(A) Dr. Ladlow‟s evidence that his theory generates consistently accurate predictions about how rates will perform in a maze is inaccurate The correctness of Dr. Ladlow experiment is given, so this answer is nonsense

(B) Psychologists who can derive consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze from their theories cannot responsibly conclude that those theories cannot be disproved Consistent with what is understand with Anson's argument

(C) No matter how responsible psychologists are, they can never develop correct theoretical explanations. No one say that

(D) Responsible psychologists do not make predictions about how rats will perform in a maze no one say that

(E) Psychologists who accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect are responsible psychologists. We could not reverse the logic. Anson talked about Ladlow, a psychologist with evidence showing consistent prediction of rat, not all responsible psychologist as a whole. Also, Anson defined that accepting possibility of new evidence disproving a theory is a necessary condition to be a responsible psychologist, not sufficient
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17206
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstra [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstra [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne