Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 15:38 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 15:38

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 518
Own Kudos [?]: 3827 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 206
Own Kudos [?]: 406 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
GMAT 2: 760  Q50  V42
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 623
Own Kudos [?]: 1953 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
 Q49  V41
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 696
Own Kudos [?]: 2799 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]
Here are my answers:

D B D B E D E

Time taken: 13 minutes
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 58
Own Kudos [?]: 62 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]
time taken 15 mins.

DBBBDCE (post OA). Please post OA Nitya.....I am new to RC forum.:)
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Oct 2008
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]
18 mins 52 secs!! :(

Looking at it I thought the passage wasn't long..but yeah it was.

My answers DBDBADE
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 696
Own Kudos [?]: 2799 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]
Nitya, u got enough responses now. Pls post the OAs
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 518
Own Kudos [?]: 3827 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
Re: Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]
OAs are DBABADE
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 206
Own Kudos [?]: 406 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
GMAT 2: 760  Q50  V42
Send PM
Re: Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]
My first 100% score .... 8-)

Though I dint attend 3rd Q for which I could not get line 18.
Thanks Icandy and Nitya
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 149
Own Kudos [?]: 296 [0]
Given Kudos: 56
Location: Kolkata
Concentration: Strategic Management
Schools:La Martiniere for Boys
Send PM
Re: Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]
hemantsood can you explain 25.
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 206
Own Kudos [?]: 406 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
GMAT 2: 760  Q50  V42
Send PM
Re: Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]
rampuria wrote:
hemantsood can you explain 25.

Here you go.

25. According to information provided by the passage, which of the following stars would astronomers most likely describe as a planetary nebula?

(A) A star that began its life with a mass of 5.5 M⊙, has exhausted its nuclear fuel, and has a core that is visible to astronomers
(B) A star that began its life with a mass of 6 M⊙, lost mass at a rate of 1 M⊙ per 10,000 years, and exhausted its nuclear fuel in 40,000 years
(C) A star that has exhausted its nuclear fuel, has a mass of 1.2 M⊙, and is surrounded by a circumstellar cloud that obscures its core from view
(D) A star that began its life with a mass greater than 6 M⊙, has just recently exhausted its nuclear fuel, and is in the process of releasing massive amounts of gravitational energy
(E) A star that began its life with a mass of 5.5 M⊙, has yet to exhaust its nuclear fuel, and exhibits a rate of mass loss similar to that of IRC+10216

Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of red giant and supergiant stars. When the core of a giant star whose mass surpasses 1.4 times the present mass of our Sun (M⊙) exhausts its nuclear fuel, it is unable to support its own weight and collapses into a tiny neutron star. The gravitational energy released during this implosion of the core blows off the remainder of the star in a gigantic explosion, or a supernova. Since around 50 percent of all stars are believed to begin their lives with masses greater than 1.4M⊙, we might expect that one out of every two stars would die as a supernova. But in fact, only one star in thirty dies such a violent death. The rest expire much more peacefully as planetary nebulas. Apparently most massive stars manage to lose sufficient material that their masses drop below the critical value of 1.4 M⊙ before they exhaust their nuclear fuel.

Evidence supporting this view comes from observations of IRC+10216, a pulsating giant star located 700 light-years away from Earth. A huge rate of mass loss (1 M⊙ every 10,000 years) has been deduced from infrared observations of ammonia (NH3) molecules located in the circumstellar cloud around IRC+10216. Recent microwave observations of carbon monoxide (CO) molecules indicate a similar rate of mass loss and demonstrate that the escaping material extends outward from the star for a distance of at least one light-year. Because we know the size of the cloud around IRC+10216 and can use our observations of either NH3 or CO to measure the outflow velocity, we can calculate an age for the circumstellar cloud. IRC+10216 has apparently expelled, in the form of molecules and dust grains, a mass equal to that of our entire Sun within the past ten thousand years. This implies that some stars can shed huge amounts of matter very quickly and thus may never expire as supernovas. Theoretical models as well as statistics on supernovas and planetary nebulas suggest that stars that begin their lives with masses around 6 M⊙ shed sufficient material to drop below the critical value of 1.4 M⊙. IRC+10216, for example, should do this in a mere 50,000 years from its birth, only an instant in the life of a star.

But what place does IRC+10216 have in stellar evolution? Astronomers suggest that stars like IRC+10216 are actually “protoplanetary nebulas”—old giant stars whose dense cores have almost but not quite rid themselves of the fluffy envelopes of gas around them. Once the star has lost the entire envelope, its exposed core becomes the central star of the planetary nebula and heats and ionizes the last vestiges of the envelope as it flows away into space. This configuration is a full-fledged planetary nebula, long familiar to optical astronomers.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Reading Comprehension (RC) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13961 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne