SJM2 wrote:
gtb2009 wrote:
What's Fuqua's grade disclosure policy?
As of now, we have a full disclosure policy (meaning the recruiter has access to our grades if requested), but there has been some talk this year about doing away with that. I think it's just talk, though. Personally, I like grade disclosure. If a firm is going to take a chance on someone and shower him with many thousands of dollars then the firm should see how he's doing in school. And if a student is worried about grade disclosure then maybe he should just do better.
I am actually surprised on your stance and the policy in general because to me, grade disclosure creates inter-classmate competition, which is somewhat different than the collaborative environment Duke is known for. Additionally, the policy incentivizes people to only take classes that play to their strengths and discourages them from taking courses that could stretch them and be more challenging, which is a bummer at a school like Fuqua that has a fairly flexible curriculum.
Its not a matter of "just doing better", especially when the students are coming from such diverse backgrounds. I highly doubt that a former engineer is going to be on the same level as someone like me with a wall street background as we go through a capital markets class. And guess what, he is probably going to be the career switcher, not me and is going to need help. If you have a grade disclosure policy based on a forced curve, you are upping the competition in the class and while yeah I will probably still lend a hand, I will also have in the back of my mind that 25% range I need to be in. I fail to see how the grades are even that relevant/valid on a forced curve basis, no matter how bright the class is, only 25% can get the highest mark.
Just a different way of looking at the policy I guess.