NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 21:40 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 21:40
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 United State

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
rohitgoel15
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 187
Own Kudos [?]: 2803 [9]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 United State [#permalink] New post   Updated on: 03 Feb 2020, 01:12
9
Bookmarks
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

79% (01:32) correct 21% (01:47) wrong based on 661 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 United States voters and asked how they planned to vote in the coming presidential election. The survey sample included a variety of respondents—rural and urban, male and female, from every state. The poll predicted that Alfred Landon would soundly defeat Franklin Roosevelt. Nevertheless, Roosevelt won in a landslide.

Which one of the following, if true, best explains why the poll’s prediction was inaccurate?


(A) The interviewers did not reveal their own political affiliation to the respondents.

(B) Only people who would be qualified to vote by election time were interviewed, so the survey sample was not representative of the overall United States population.

(C) The survey sample was representative only of people who could afford telephones at a time when phone ownership was less common than it is today.

(D) No effort was made to determine the respondents’ political affiliations.

(E) Because the poll asked only for respondents’ candidate preference, it collected no information concerning their reasons for favoring Landon or Roosevelt.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
C

Originally posted by rohitgoel15 on 24 Jul 2010, 02:09.
Last edited by Bunuel on 03 Feb 2020, 01:12, edited 2 times in total.
Reformatted question
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
L
Bunuel
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92883
Own Kudos [?]: 618626 [1]
Given Kudos: 81563
Send PM
CAT Tests Forum Quiz Mode
Re: In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 United State [#permalink] New post   16 Apr 2021, 05:45
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
rohitgoel15 wrote:
In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 United States voters and asked how they planned to vote in the coming presidential election. The survey sample included a variety of respondents—rural and urban, male and female, from every state. The poll predicted that Alfred Landon would soundly defeat Franklin Roosevelt. Nevertheless, Roosevelt won in a landslide.

Which one of the following, if true, best explains why the poll’s prediction was inaccurate?


(A) The interviewers did not reveal their own political affiliation to the respondents.

(B) Only people who would be qualified to vote by election time were interviewed, so the survey sample was not representative of the overall United States population.

(C) The survey sample was representative only of people who could afford telephones at a time when phone ownership was less common than it is today.

(D) No effort was made to determine the respondents’ political affiliations.

(E) Because the poll asked only for respondents’ candidate preference, it collected no information concerning their reasons for favoring Landon or Roosevelt.


OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



(A) No. This would increase the poll’s credibility. Had the interviewers revealed their political affiliations, it would have decreased the poll’s credibility because their opinions might have influenced the people they were interviewing.

(B) No. This would increase the poll’s credibility. The opinions of those unqualified to vote were irrelevant since they did not vote.

(C) Yes. We are looking for something that might have caused the poll to be unrepresentative of the general population. Now, in 1936, phones were not as common as today. If most of the phones were in the homes of the wealthy who held opinions that differed from those of most of the population, then the poll would not have been based on a good cross section of the electorate.

(D) No. Asking for the respondents’ political affiliations would probably help determine how representative the poll was. However, if a disproportionate number of respondents were supporters of Alfred Landon, this choice does not explain why the selection process was skewed.

(E) No. This might somewhat explain the inaccuracy of the poll: Perhaps the support for Landon was weak or very volatile. Nevertheless, there is a much stronger explanation offered.
General Discussion
avatar
ImJun
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Posts: 19
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: currently in Taiwan
Concentration: Business
Schools:Top Taiwanese university
GPA: Very low
Send PM
Re: In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 United State [#permalink] New post   24 Jul 2010, 02:53
(B) Only people who would be qualified to vote by election time were interviewed, so the survey sample was not representative of the overall United States population.
It makes a bit of sense, but not strongly clear enough to explain the shocking result of the election.

(C) totally explains it, since the fewer people with telephones at home, the less accuate the telephone survey will be.
User avatar
tryingharder
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Posts: 57
Own Kudos [?]: 74 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 United State [#permalink] New post   28 Jul 2010, 05:30
The argument is least bothered about overall United States Population. The Argument has explicitly talked about United States voters. As maintained by the argument it is clear that United States Voters are NOT an accurate reflection of the the GENERAL POPULATION. Therefore no need to assume something that is long way away.
B can be ruled out in view of the reason that the information in B is beyond the facts stated on the argument.

C is precise
User avatar
dwivedys
Director
Director
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 603
Own Kudos [?]: 673 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Concentration: Strategy
Schools:Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
 Q48  V33 GMAT 2: 670  Q46  V36 GMAT 3: 720  Q49  V40
Send PM
Re: In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 United State [#permalink] New post   28 Jul 2010, 08:51
If as B says only those people who were eligible to vote were interviewed - the survey was in fact representative of the population. B just stitches two contradistinct scenarios - if eligible voters alone were interviewed - how can the sample not be representative? You don't want to count the opinion of those who would not have been eligible to vote in the first place So B does not explain the discrepancy.
User avatar
S
Desertchampion
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2018
Posts: 63
Own Kudos [?]: 130 [3]
Given Kudos: 1036
Send PM
Re: In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 United State [#permalink] New post   12 Jul 2019, 09:18
3
Kudos
In this question, we're looking for a discrepancy between the predicted outcome and the actual outcome of the election. The answer choice should give us a reason for this discrepancy.

(A) The interviewers did not reveal their own political affiliation to the respondents.
If the interviewer HAD REVEALED their own political affiliation, it may have altered the answers they received, however this says that they did not reveal their own political affiliation, so it should have not had any effect on the results of the survey.

(B) Only people who would be qualified to vote by election time were interviewed, so the survey sample was not representative of the overall United States population.
Again, if the opposite of this had happened, it would have had an effect on the survey results, but it didn't and therefore it should have not had any effect on the survey results.

(C) The survey sample was representative only of people who could afford telephones at a time when phone ownership was less common than it is today.
Bingo! This shows that there may be a reason as to why only some people in the population were excluded from the survey.

(D) No effort was made to determine the respondents’ political affiliations.
This is irrelevant. Even if respondents were asked about their political affiliations, it would not have had an effect on the outcome of the survey results.

(E) Because the poll asked only for respondents’ candidate preference, it collected no information concerning their reasons for favoring Landon or Roosevelt.
Again this is irrelevant. Even if the poll collected the reasons for favoring Landon or Roosevelt, it would not have had an effect on the survey results.

The correct answer is answer choice C.


Please give kudos if this was helpful in any way!
User avatar
P
gloomybison
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2021
Posts: 228
Own Kudos [?]: 192 [0]
Given Kudos: 93
Location: Turkey
Schools: Yale '26 (A) LBS '26 (WL) Booth '26 (A) Columbia CBS'26 (A) Kellogg '26 (A) Tuck '26 (A) Wharton '26 (D) Sloan '26 (D)
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.69
Send PM
Re: In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 United State [#permalink] New post   18 Nov 2022, 11:47
I believe that this question is seriously flawed;

We know that 10k people were surveyed from different places/genders, and we are looking for a bias in the survey to conclude that the survey results didn't show the reality.

(C) The survey sample was representative only of people who could afford telephones at a time when phone ownership was less common than it is today.

How can someone's affording a telephone in 1936 may create a bias? Can you safely assume that they are rich?even if you assume so, does being rich create some sort of tendency to vote for someone? This option stands on a few links of further assumptions, making it quite a feeble and shaky of an answer...
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 United State [#permalink]
18 Nov 2022, 11:47
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
mysterymanrog
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions