Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 10:37 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 10:37

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Status:Apply - Last Chance
Affiliations: IIT, Purdue, PhD, TauBetaPi
Posts: 538
Own Kudos [?]: 360 [5]
Given Kudos: 15
Concentration: $ Finance $
Schools:Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Haas
 Q50  V37
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: 8 years in Oil&Gas
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Status:swimming against the current
Posts: 119
Own Kudos [?]: 336 [0]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: Chennai, India
Concentration: Finance
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Status:Apply - Last Chance
Affiliations: IIT, Purdue, PhD, TauBetaPi
Posts: 538
Own Kudos [?]: 360 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Concentration: $ Finance $
Schools:Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Haas
 Q50  V37
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: 8 years in Oil&Gas
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Status:swimming against the current
Posts: 119
Own Kudos [?]: 336 [1]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: Chennai, India
Concentration: Finance
Send PM
Re: After increasing steadily from 1995 to 2000, the percentage of student [#permalink]
1
Kudos
yep Didn't love it but I dont think its wrong "30 pounds too much than they should be" doesn't sound wrong.

the rest uses "Decreased and fell decreased and falling"
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Status:Apply - Last Chance
Affiliations: IIT, Purdue, PhD, TauBetaPi
Posts: 538
Own Kudos [?]: 360 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Concentration: $ Finance $
Schools:Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Haas
 Q50  V37
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: 8 years in Oil&Gas
Send PM
Re: After increasing steadily from 1995 to 2000, the percentage of student [#permalink]
30 pounds more than they should be? I mean too much is just too much to me :)
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 139
Own Kudos [?]: 215 [0]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
Re: After increasing steadily from 1995 to 2000, the percentage of student [#permalink]
i thought this was some weird twister with a permissible exception to the 'thou shalt not use "being" principle'... picked c and wrong... looking back E is the only one which survives the redundancy-elimination process:

A. decrease --- down
B. decrease --- fall
C. decrease --- fall
D. decrease --- fall

use of "too much" in E is an evil too (too much compared to what?)--- but perhaps a lesser evil. I guess redundancy trumps somewhat vague phrasing (with "too much") here... but I'd like to know too from a GMAT prep expert if "redundancy" once spotted simply seals the fate of a sentence in the SC section of the GMAT.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42102 [0]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: After increasing steadily from 1995 to 2000, the percentage of student [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Coming to think of redundancy, will a percentage falling or decreasing to some x percent or y percent, (I mean the use of percentage and percent in the same sentence,) amount to redundancy?

Won’t it be better to say the percentage of students decreased the following two years to 42.0 in 2002 from 43.4 in 2001 and from 44.7 in 2000?
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Status:mba here i come!
Posts: 151
Own Kudos [?]: 1938 [0]
Given Kudos: 48
Send PM
Re: After increasing steadily from 1995 to 2000, the percentage of student [#permalink]
alright, the catch here is that 'who' is required here otherwise 'suffering' or 'having symptoms' seem to incorrectly modify schools.

D is not parallel, so we're left with E.

i didn't like '30 pounds too much' as well but at least this is not grammatically incorrect. it does mean 30 pounds overweight.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 126
Own Kudos [?]: 141 [0]
Given Kudos: 83
Location: Canada
Schools: LBS '18
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE:Design (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: After increasing steadily from 1995 to 2000, the percentage of student [#permalink]
Why is there a comma in E before the 'to'?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 138
Own Kudos [?]: 66 [0]
Given Kudos: 79
Send PM
Re: After increasing steadily from 1995 to 2000, the percentage of student [#permalink]
Can someone explain how "who suffered from diabetes or weighed at least 30 pounds too much" modifies students and not middle schools?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2015
Posts: 63
Own Kudos [?]: 695 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: After increasing steadily from 1995 to 2000, the percentage of student [#permalink]
mainhoon wrote:
I dont know if I can post a VeritasPrep SC, but can someone explain this answer?

After increasing steadily from 1995 to 2000, the percentage of students in urban middle schools suffering from diabetes or being at least 30 pounds overweight decreased the following two years, down to 42.0 percent in 2002 from 43.4 percent in 2001 and 44.7 percent in 2000.

A suffering from diabetes or being at least 30 pounds overweight decreased the following two years, down to 42.0 percent in 2002 from 43.4 percent in 2001 and . Eliminate [Highlighted are redundant]

B suffering from diabetes or weighing at least 30 pounds too much, decreasing in the following two years, falling to 42.0 percent in 2002 from 43.4 percent in 2001 and from
Eliminate [This is superficial parallelism- italicized . The percentage of students is decreasing not the students themselves. Plus redundancy issue-highlighted in red]

C having symptoms of diabetes or being at least 30 pounds overweight decreased the following two years, and fell to 42.0 percent in 2002 from 43.4 percent in 2001 and from Eliminate. Awkward meaning because of "and fell" and redundancy

D who either suffered from diabetes or they weighed at least 30 pounds too much, decreasing the following two years, fell to 42.0 percent in 2002 from 43.4 percent in 2001 and . Eliminate. Reason same as above

E who suffered from diabetes or weighed at least 30 pounds too much decreased the following two years, to 42.0 percent in 2002 from 43.4 percent in 2001 and

I chose A.


I believe this is a poor quality question.

But anyway E is least erroneous for the above reasons.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17204
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: After increasing steadily from 1995 to 2000, the percentage of student [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: After increasing steadily from 1995 to 2000, the percentage of student [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne