It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 11:03

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Paper CR Test 31

Author Message
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2553

Kudos [?]: 527 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2008, 13:56
1
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

6. Finally analyzed the answer and it does make sense, want to see your thoughs. Thx

Demographers doing research for an international economics newsletter claim that the average per capita income in the country of Kuptala is substantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton. They also claim, however, that whereas poverty is relatively rare in Kuptala, over half the population of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty. At least one of the demographers' claims must, therefore, be wrong.
The argument above is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
(A) It rejects an empirical claim about the average per capita incomes in the two countries without making any attempt to discredit that claim by offering additional economic evidence.
(B) It treats the vague term "poverty" as though it had a precise and universally accepted meaning.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.
(D) It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton.
(E) It does not consider the possibility that incomes in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country's average per capita income.

Kudos [?]: 527 [1], given: 0

Director
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 618

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 1

Re: Paper CR Test 31 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2008, 15:41
It's E.

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 1

Director
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Posts: 751

Kudos [?]: 235 [0], given: 8

Location: Oxford
Schools: Oxford'10
Re: Paper CR Test 31 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2008, 15:45
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
6. Finally analyzed the answer and it does make sense, want to see your thoughs. Thx

Demographers doing research for an international economics newsletter claim that the average per capita income in the country of Kuptala is substantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton. They also claim, however, that whereas poverty is relatively rare in Kuptala, over half the population of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty. At least one of the demographers' claims must, therefore, be wrong.
The argument above is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
(A) It rejects an empirical claim about the average per capita incomes in the two countries without making any attempt to discredit that claim by offering additional economic evidence.
(B) It treats the vague term "poverty" as though it had a precise and universally accepted meaning.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.
(D) It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton.
(E) It does not consider the possibility that incomes in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country's average per capita income.

i think its E, because Bill Gates could be from Bahlton and raise the average capita income to be way over Kuptala, yes all by himself .

Kudos [?]: 235 [0], given: 8

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1878

Kudos [?]: 1443 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Re: Paper CR Test 31 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2008, 21:28
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
6. Finally analyzed the answer and it does make sense, want to see your thoughs. Thx

Demographers doing research for an international economics newsletter claim that the average per capita income in the country of Kuptala is substantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton. They also claim, however, that whereas poverty is relatively rare in Kuptala, over half the population of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty. At least one of the demographers' claims must, therefore, be wrong.
The argument above is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
(A) It rejects an empirical claim about the average per capita incomes in the two countries without making any attempt to discredit that claim by offering additional economic evidence.
(B) It treats the vague term "poverty" as though it had a precise and universally accepted meaning.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.
(D) It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton.
(E) It does not consider the possibility that incomes in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country's average per capita income.

The question is finding the flaw in counter-argument to the claim of Demographers.

Counter-argument to the claims is: "at least one one of the demographers' claims must, therefore, be wrong".

If we find at least one of the situation that claims of demographers true, then the counter-argument is vulnerable.

C: counter-argument ignored the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.

Let say more about C. When population of Kuptala is bigger than that of Bahlton, it is very likely that "average per capita income" of the two is different, one lower than the other, depending on the income information.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1443 [0], given: 1

CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3583

Kudos [?]: 4661 [0], given: 360

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Re: Paper CR Test 31 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2008, 23:05
E

income (100,1,1,1) in Bahlton and income (10,10,10,10) in Kuptala explains situation and therefore, the demographers' claims can be true.
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Kudos [?]: 4661 [0], given: 360

Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 114

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Re: Paper CR Test 31 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2008, 10:52
Agree with Walker...E it is

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2553

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Re: Paper CR Test 31 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2008, 16:39
OA is E

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 780

Kudos [?]: 189 [0], given: 0

Re: Paper CR Test 31 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2008, 02:20
Country Kuptala has lower per capital income compare to Bahlton.
However, Bahlton has more number of people under poverty.

(A) It rejects an empirical claim about the average per capita incomes in the two countries without making any attempt to discredit that claim by offering additional economic evidence.[This is not necessary. It is given two distinct economic factors. – Eliminate it]

(B) It treats the vague term "poverty" as though it had a precise and universally accepted meaning. [ This argument is not about definition – eliminate it]

(C) It overlooks the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.[But country Bahlton has extreme poverty. So we cannot assume both countries has same level – eliminate it]

(D) It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton.[Social significance is not discussed in the argument – eliminate it]

(E) It does not consider the possibility that incomes in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country's average per capita income.[Hold it]

Kudos [?]: 189 [0], given: 0

Re: Paper CR Test 31   [#permalink] 03 Feb 2008, 02:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Paper CR Test 31

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.