It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 13:09

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Passengers must exit airplanes swiftly after accidents,

Author Message
Director
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 582

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Location: Chicago
Passengers must exit airplanes swiftly after accidents, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2006, 19:34
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Passengers must exit airplanes swiftly after accidents, since gases released following accidents are toxic to humans and often explode soon after being released. In order to prevent passenger deaths from gas inhalation, safety officials recommend that passengers be provided with smoke hoods that prevent inhalation of the gases.
Which of the following, if true, constitutes the strongest reason not to require implementation of the safety officialsâ€™ recommendation?
(A) Test evacuations showed that putting on the smoke hoods added considerably to the overall time it took passengers to leave the cabin.
(B) Some airlines are unwilling to buy the smoke hoods because they consider them to be prohibitively expensive.
(C) Although the smoke hoods protect passengers from the toxic gases, they can do nothing to prevent the gases from igniting.
(D) Some experienced flyers fail to pay attention to the safety instructions given on every commercial flight before takeoff.
(E) In many airplane accidents, passengers who were able to reach emergency exits were overcome by toxic gases before they could exit the airplane.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 139

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Location: Fringes of the Boreal, Canada

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2006, 20:29
Going with A here:

"gases released following accidents are toxic to humans and often explode soon after being released"

Shows they don't have much time to get h*ll outta there. Getting blown up is probably a greater health risk than inhaling toxic fumes which forces me to conclude that time is of the essence. => A
_________________

"To hell with circumstances; I create opportunities." - Bruce Lee

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 1057

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

Location: USA

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2006, 21:19
My bet is on A.

Also the masks could be so combursome that passengers cannot walk to the exists after wearing it
_________________

"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."

- Bernard Edmonds

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 582

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Location: Chicago

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2006, 21:34
Why not C guys..

Even after wearing the maskes you cannot prevent the gases from igniting..So what if the passengers are wasting lot of time in that, it would infact be more dangerous as the gases might ignite by then

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 901

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2006, 22:01
Hey Andy,
It's not a SC as you mentioned in the subject line.

Brajesh

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 77

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2006, 22:08
andy_gr8 wrote:
Why not C guys..

Even after wearing the maskes you cannot prevent the gases from igniting..So what if the passengers are wasting lot of time in that, it would infact be more dangerous as the gases might ignite by then

I was leaning towards "C" initially, but I think I want to go with "A"

Here are my reasons :

Arguments states
- Passengers must leave swiftly
- gases released can be toxic to humans
- gases can explode after release

safety official's proposal - provide smoke hoods to prevent inhalation of toxic gas

official's recommendation of hoods is addressing only one part - preventing inhalation. It was not suggeted to protect from explosion

"C" - says- hoods don't help protect from explosion. But they were never recommended for that purpose

A - If the very act of wearing the hood is going to considerably increase the overall time, then, the passengers are not leaving swiftly. There by risking inhalation and/or explosion.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 713

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2006, 22:15
Tricky one )))A for me
officials recommend that passengers be provided with smoke hoods that prevent inhalation of the gases. But Test evacuations showed that putting on the smoke hoods added considerably to the overall time it took passengers to leave the cabin.
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 474

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2006, 22:17
andy_gr8 wrote:
Why not C guys..

Even after wearing the maskes you cannot prevent the gases from igniting..So what if the passengers are wasting lot of time in that, it would infact be more dangerous as the gases might ignite by then

Although the smoke hoods protect passengers from the toxic gases, they can do nothing to prevent the gases from igniting.

I think here argument doesn't talk about ignition of gases thats why it is wrong.

Guys correct me if I'm wrong

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2892

Kudos [?]: 323 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2006, 01:34
My money on A.

Andy, main concern here to get the passangers swiftly out of the cabin after accident. C is not talking about this.

If a passanger leaves the cabin as soon as possible then he will be saved from both inhalation of gases and explosion of gases.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 323 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5206

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2006, 07:31
I`ll bet the farm on (A). If the hoods require precious extra minutes (or seconds) to apply, then the death toll from smoke inhalation will inevitably rise. Besides, most people can hold their breath long enough to get near an emergency exit on a commercial jet.

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2006, 10:19
A is better because it says that the gas can explode so it is better for passengers to evacute fast rather than fumble to get the mask right for hours.

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 582

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Location: Chicago

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2006, 21:34
Good explanation guys...
OA is A...

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

25 Jan 2006, 21:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by