It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 15:00

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Patents

Author Message
Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 743

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Location: Dallas, Texas

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2006, 20:14
Cheering for B
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 90

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2006, 22:31
When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce patented technology, the consumer invariably loses. The company that holds the patent can charge exorbitant prices because there is no direct competition. When the patents expire, other companies are free to manufacture the technology and prices fall. Companies should therefore allow other manufacturers to license patented technology.

The argument above presupposes which of the following?

A . Companies cannot find legal ways to produce technology similar to patented technology.
B . Companies have an obligation to act in the best interest of the consumer.
C . Too many patents are granted to companies that are unwilling to share them.
D . The consumer can tell the difference between patented technology and inferior imitations.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1012

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2006, 22:33
nischalb wrote:
When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce patented technology, the consumer invariably loses. The company that holds the patent can charge exorbitant prices because there is no direct competition. When the patents expire, other companies are free to manufacture the technology and prices fall. Companies should therefore allow other manufacturers to license patented technology.

The argument above presupposes which of the following?

A . Companies cannot find legal ways to produce technology similar to patented technology.
B . Companies have an obligation to act in the best interest of the consumer.
C . Too many patents are granted to companies that are unwilling to share them.
D . The consumer can tell the difference between patented technology and inferior imitations.

Based on the highlighted text, I will choose B

We discussed this question recently.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 188

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Nov 2006, 10:21
Yeah every business school applicant should know that companies don't necessarily act in he bets interest of the consumers

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 33

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2006, 07:04
I vote for B

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

05 Nov 2006, 07:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by