It is currently 12 Dec 2017, 12:13

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# People cannot be morally responsible for things over which

Author Message
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 851

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 0

People cannot be morally responsible for things over which [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2007, 09:44
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

People cannot be morally responsible for things over which they have no control. Therefore, they should not be held morally responsible for any inevitable consequences of such things, either. Determining whether adults have any control over the treatment they are receiving can be difficult. Hence in some cases it can be difficult to know whether adults bear any moral responsibility for the way they are treated. Everyone, however, sometimes acts in ways that are an inevitable consequence of treatment received as an infant and infants clearly cannot control, and so are not morally responsible for, the treatment they receive.

Anyone making the claims above would be logically committed to which one of the following further claims?
(A) An infant should never be held morally responsible for an action that infant has performed.
(B) There are certain commonly performed actions for which no one performing those actions should ever be held morally responsible.
(C) Adults who claim that they have no control over the treatment they are receiving should often be held at least partially responsible for being so treated.
(D) If a given action is within a certain personâ€™s control that person should be held morally.
(E) No adult should be held morally responsible for every action he or she performs.

Please give reasons for ur choices...

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 248

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Schools: Ross, Kellogg, Darden (i/v)

### Show Tags

28 Mar 2007, 01:38
D??
God, this is an RC and a CR combined into one.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 272

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2007, 07:14
E

some adults act in ways that are an inevitable consequence of treatment received as an infant and so are not morally responsible

No adult should be held morally responsible for [b]every [/b]action he or she performs
_________________

AimHigher

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1438

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2007, 07:23
AimHigher wrote:
E

some adults act in ways that are an inevitable consequence of treatment received as an infant and so are not morally responsible

No adult should be held morally responsible for every action he or she performs

Are you sure it's E?

I don't follow your reasoning. E for one is way too restrictive.

I'd prefer D.

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 13

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 253

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2007, 08:03
D.

not morally responsible= no control

therefore

morally responsible=control

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 110

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2007, 08:04
D.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 292

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2007, 09:05
I understand why D looks good, but E is also good with the very interesting logic of the above.

If EVERYONE acts in a certain way due to treatment recieved as an infant...and we cannot be responsible for these actions, since we could not be morally responsible for the actions upon us as infants.

then logically there are some actions taken by all adults which they cannot be held responsible for!

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 292

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2007, 09:07
D actually makes no sense...what does "held morally" mean?

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 212

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2007, 14:30
1. People --
no control--> no responsible-->no responsible for the consequences;

2. Everyone sometimes--
no control and in a consequences -->no responsible for the consequences.

are to demonstrate:
(E) No adult should be held morally responsible for every action he or she performs.

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 851

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2007, 20:26
Thanks guys the OA is E

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 0

29 Mar 2007, 20:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# People cannot be morally responsible for things over which

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.