It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 23:34

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# People should be held accountable for their own behavior,

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 331

Kudos [?]: 110 [0], given: 0

People should be held accountable for their own behavior, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2006, 01:31
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

People should be held accountable for their own behavior, and if holding people accountable for their own behavior entails capital punishment, then so be it. However, no person should be held accountable for behavior over which he or she had no control.

Which of the following is the most logical conclusion of the argument above?

(A) People should not be held accountable for the behavior of other people.
(B) People have control over their own behavior.
(C) People cannot control the behavior of other people.
(D) Behavior that cannot be controlled should not be punished.
(E) People have control over behavior that is subject to capital punishment.

Kudos [?]: 110 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 162

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2006, 02:57
E...

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Location: India

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2006, 03:22
I will go with A.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 281

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - logical conclusion [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2006, 07:53
People should be held accountable for their own behavior, and if holding people accountable for their own behavior entails capital punishment, then so be it. However, no person should be held accountable for behavior over which he or she had no control.

Which of the following is the most logical conclusion of the argument above?

(A) People should not be held accountable for the behavior of other people. - EVEN IF PEOPLE ARE IN CONTROL OF OTHERS ACTION ?
(B) People have control over their own behavior. -- REJECT
(C) People cannot control the behavior of other people. - NOT A CONCLUSION
(D) Behavior that cannot be controlled should not be punished. - CAN BE PUNISHED BUT SHOULD NOT BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE
(E) People have control over behavior that is subject to capital punishment. - SUBJECT TO CP MEANS ACCOUNTABLE ????? MAY BE NOT

BUT IF ACCOUNTABLE THEN - NO CONTROL IS ESTABLISHED .

IMO E -- but reluctantly --- what is the source ? LSAT 1000 CR

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 231

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2006, 09:16
why is B wrong?

people having control over their behaviors leads to capital punishment. But if they are able to control it, then they will not suffer such punishment.

Also, the last sentence 'However, no person should be held accountable for behavior over which he or she had no control.'

thanks...

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 176

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2006, 09:26
I think it's B. It's the safe answer.

A. I could have control over the behavior of other people. passage doesn't say anything about that.

C. Passage doesn't say that. It just says that I shouldn't be held acountable if I can't control it, which implies that I can control other people's behavior.

D. This is not clear. Who's behavior? If it's talking about mine, then this sentence contradicts the passage.

e. This contradicts the second sentence.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 331

Kudos [?]: 110 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2006, 13:06
biggamejames wrote:
I think it's B. It's the safe answer.

A. I could have control over the behavior of other people. passage doesn't say anything about that.

C. Passage doesn't say that. It just says that I shouldn't be held acountable if I can't control it, which implies that I can control other people's behavior.

D. This is not clear. Who's behavior? If it's talking about mine, then this sentence contradicts the passage.

e. This contradicts the second sentence.

Correct B is the answer.. I am pasting the oA below..

The correct response is (B). The argument includes the following two premises:

Premise: People are accountable for their own behavior.
Premise: People are not accountable for behavior they cannot control.

Here's the logical conclusion based on these two premises:

Conclusion: People can control their own behavior.

(A) would require that people never have control over the behavior of other people. Yet the argument does not provide this premise.

(C) would require that people should not be held accountable for the behavior of other people. Yet the argument does not provide this premise.

(D) is not a conclusion; (D) simply reiterates one of the argument's premises (the second sentence).

(E) is not inferable. The argument allows for the possibility that a person might not have control over another person's behavior which is subject to capital punishment.

Kudos [?]: 110 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 281

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 05:05

A. I could have control over the behavior of other people. passage doesn't say anything about that.

C. Passage doesn't say that. It just says that I shouldn't be held acountable if I can't control it, which implies that I can control other people's behavior.

D. This is not clear. Who's behavior? If it's talking about mine, then this sentence contradicts the passage.

e. This contradicts the second sentence.[/quote]

Correct B is the answer.. I am pasting the oA below..

The correct response is (B). The argument includes the following two premises:

Premise: People are accountable for their own behavior.
Premise: People are not accountable for behavior they cannot control.

Here's the logical conclusion based on these two premises:

Conclusion: People can control their own behavior.

(A) would require that people never have control over the behavior of other people. Yet the argument does not provide this premise.

(C) would require that people should not be held accountable for the behavior of other people. Yet the argument does not provide this premise.

(D) is not a conclusion; (D) simply reiterates one of the argument's premises (the second sentence).

(E) is not inferable. The argument allows for the possibility that a person might not have control over another person's behavior which is subject to capital punishment.[/quote]

hmmm I get it now.

B only says humans have control -may not be all the time but they do .

all other options are far fetched.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 06:46
(B) just seems a little too extreme, especially considering the passage explicitly states "should." Clearly, some schizophrenics don`t have control over there own behavior.

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

05 Jul 2006, 06:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# People should be held accountable for their own behavior,

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.