It is currently 15 Dec 2017, 23:26

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

People traveling in small cars are more likely to be

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 580

Kudos [?]: 856 [0], given: 20

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2012, 03:11
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

76% (01:10) correct 24% (01:42) wrong based on 98 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

People traveling in small cars are more likely to be seriously injured than those traveling in larger vehicles when their vehicle is
involved in an accident. Therefore, if more people drove larger vehicles instead of small cars, the number of seriously injured
traffic accidents would reduce.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. In traffic accidents that involve pedestrians, far fewer pedestrians are seriously injured by small cars than by larger vehicles.
B. It is not likely that most people who currently drive small cars will begin to drive larger vehicles instead.
C. Fewer than half of the injuries that are caused in traffic accidents are serious injuries.
D. The proportion of traffic accidents that result in serious injuries has been steadily declining for the last ten years.
E. Recent technological improvements make larger vehicles safer now than larger vehicles of the past.
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

Kudos [?]: 856 [0], given: 20

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1214

Kudos [?]: 1720 [1], given: 116

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Premium Member
Re: People traveling in small cars [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2012, 05:14
1
This post received
KUDOS
Got A by POE and A also makes sense. The argument only takes into account the people in the car involved in the accident. A gives a reason for why it is possible for larger cars to cause more damage than smaller cars.

Kudos Please... If my post helped.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Kudos [?]: 1720 [1], given: 116

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 33

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 6

Location: United States
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: People traveling in small cars [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2012, 09:43
I think it's D..
It cannot be A, since we are concerned with injuries of people driving the cars, and in A, it talks about the injuries of the pedestrians.

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 6

VP
VP
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1074

Kudos [?]: 672 [0], given: 70

Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Nov 2012, 10:25
gmatbull wrote:
People traveling in small cars are more likely to be seriously injured than those traveling in larger vehicles when their vehicle is
involved in an accident. Therefore, if more people drove larger vehicles instead of small cars, the number of seriously injured
traffic accidents would reduce.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. In traffic accidents that involve pedestrians, far fewer pedestrians are seriously injured by small cars than by larger vehicles.
B. It is not likely that most people who currently drive small cars will begin to drive larger vehicles instead.
C. Fewer than half of the injuries that are caused in traffic accidents are serious injuries.
D. The proportion of traffic accidents that result in serious injuries has been steadily declining for the last ten years.
E. Recent technological improvements make larger vehicles safer now than larger vehicles of the past.



The argument has too many reasoning errors.
But the most obvious one is If people change their cars to larger vehicles , the no. of traffic accidents would reduce. There may be people who are pedestrians or riding bicycle who get involved in accidents with small cars. But may be in such accidents none of the small cars or large vehicle riders get injuries.

A outlines the same issue.

Lets look at D which cannot be right answer as it kills the conclusion.
Conclusion advocates to switch from Small cars to large vehicles but D states that the injuries are seriously declining. That means there is no need of switching.
its totally out of scope and Irrelevent.

Kudos [?]: 672 [0], given: 70

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Posts: 386

Kudos [?]: 239 [0], given: 82

Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Nov 2012, 11:51
by elinimation..only A make sense..A is the best choice among these five ..after all all choice luking too strange..

No any option luks too attractive to weaken the conclusion.
_________________

Bole So Nehal.. Sat Siri Akal.. Waheguru ji help me to get 700+ score !

Kudos [?]: 239 [0], given: 82

AGSM Thread Master
User avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Posts: 169

Kudos [?]: 271 [0], given: 31

Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V28
GPA: 3.3
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2012, 03:09
People traveling in small cars are more likely to be seriously injured than those traveling in larger vehicles when their vehicle is involved in an accident. Therefore, if more people drove larger vehicles instead of small cars, the number of seriously injured traffic accidents would reduce.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. In traffic accidents that involve pedestrians, far fewer pedestrians are seriously injured by small cars than by larger vehicles.- That's it. If the no. of larger vehicles increase the no. of traffic accidents involving pedestrians will increase thus, weakens the argument.
B. It is not likely that most people who currently drive small cars will begin to drive larger vehicles instead. Out of Scope.
C. Fewer than half of the injuries that are caused in traffic accidents are serious injuries. Out of Scope.
D. The proportion of traffic accidents that result in serious injuries has been steadily declining for the last ten years. ISWAT. Does not talk about larger or smaller vehicles.
E. Recent technological improvements make larger vehicles safer now than larger vehicles of the past. Strengthener

Kudos [?]: 271 [0], given: 31

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 333

Kudos [?]: 437 [1], given: 4

Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2012, 05:13
1
This post received
KUDOS
People traveling in small cars are more likely to be seriously injured than those traveling in larger vehicles when their vehicle is
involved in an accident. Therefore, if more people drove larger vehicles instead of small cars, the number of seriously injured
traffic accidents would reduce.


So overall this argument is saying that small cars are less safe

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

So... We need evidence that small care are more safe

A. In traffic accidents that involve pedestrians, far fewer pedestrians are seriously injured by small cars than by larger vehicles. This looks good to me. It is providing evidence that small cars are SAFER than big cars
B. It is not likely that most people who currently drive small cars will begin to drive larger vehicles instead. Nope. Says nothing about comparative safety
C. Fewer than half of the injuries that are caused in traffic accidents are serious injuries. No, again no comparison here between big/small
D. The proportion of traffic accidents that result in serious injuries has been steadily declining for the last ten years. Nope. This says nothing about the two things side by side. It's good news that numbers are down, but no interest to us in the GMAT
E. Recent technological improvements make larger vehicles safer now than larger vehicles of the past. This if anything strengthens the argument. More evidence that larger vehicles are safe.
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0



... and more

Kudos [?]: 437 [1], given: 4

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jul 2013, 07:52
A. In traffic accidents that involve pedestrians, far fewer pedestrians are seriously injured by small cars than by larger vehicles.- That's it. If the no. of larger vehicles increase the no. of traffic accidents involving pedestrians will increase thus, weakens the argument.
B. It is not likely that most people who currently drive small cars will begin to drive larger vehicles instead. Out of Scope.
C. Fewer than half of the injuries that are caused in traffic accidents are serious injuries. Out of Scope.
D. The proportion of traffic accidents that result in serious injuries has been steadily declining for the last ten years. ISWAT. Does not talk about larger or smaller vehicles.
E. Recent technological improvements make larger vehicles safer now than larger vehicles of the past. Strengthener


what is ISWAT and OFS used in explaining the ans above??

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 832

Kudos [?]: 1646 [0], given: 197

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jul 2013, 08:04
UrviRathod wrote:
A. In traffic accidents that involve pedestrians, far fewer pedestrians are seriously injured by small cars than by larger vehicles.- That's it. If the no. of larger vehicles increase the no. of traffic accidents involving pedestrians will increase thus, weakens the argument.
B. It is not likely that most people who currently drive small cars will begin to drive larger vehicles instead. Out of Scope.
C. Fewer than half of the injuries that are caused in traffic accidents are serious injuries. Out of Scope.
D. The proportion of traffic accidents that result in serious injuries has been steadily declining for the last ten years. ISWAT. Does not talk about larger or smaller vehicles.
E. Recent technological improvements make larger vehicles safer now than larger vehicles of the past. Strengthener


what is ISWAT and OFS used in explaining the ans above??


Hi URVi,

you need not bother about those terminology..
those are the terminology used by e-gmat prep company...and is not known to all....the author of that post must be..student of e-gmat.
just you have to understand why the option is wrong==normally we give wrong answer type a name.
OFS:OUT OF SCOPE....i dont know about ISWAT.
hope it helps
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...



GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: http://gmatclub.com/forum/vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss

Kudos [?]: 1646 [0], given: 197

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jul 2013, 10:07
hi shailesh,

Thanks a lot.

Definitely helps

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Current Student
User avatar
B
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 1439

Kudos [?]: 1320 [0], given: 820

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.35
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jul 2013, 22:15
Not really sure here ... but may be incorrect SWAT analysis :P :)
_________________

ISB Preparation Kit | GMAT Debrief

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Kudos [?]: 1320 [0], given: 820

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 147

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 41

Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2013, 21:03
plumber250 wrote:
People traveling in small cars are more likely to be seriously injured than those traveling in larger vehicles when their vehicle is
involved in an accident. Therefore, if more people drove larger vehicles instead of small cars, the number of seriously injured
traffic accidents would reduce.


So overall this argument is saying that small cars are less safe

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

So... We need evidence that small care are more safe

A. In traffic accidents that involve pedestrians, far fewer pedestrians are seriously injured by small cars than by larger vehicles. This looks good to me. It is providing evidence that small cars are SAFER than big cars
B. It is not likely that most people who currently drive small cars will begin to drive larger vehicles instead. Nope. Says nothing about comparative safety
C. Fewer than half of the injuries that are caused in traffic accidents are serious injuries. No, again no comparison here between big/small
D. The proportion of traffic accidents that result in serious injuries has been steadily declining for the last ten years. Nope. This says nothing about the two things side by side. It's good news that numbers are down, but no interest to us in the GMAT
E. Recent technological improvements make larger vehicles safer now than larger vehicles of the past. This if anything strengthens the argument. More evidence that larger vehicles are safe.


Hi,

The conclusion is that :
if more people drove larger vehicles instead of small cars ------> then, the number of seriously injured traffic accidents would reduce.

The assumption that author is making while deducing the conclusion is that both large vehicles and small vehicles are drived in the same manner.
SO, basically it is the strength of the large vehicles that makes them more secure and less vulnerable to passengers serious injuries.

Now, as in B if i say that people are not likely to driver large cars, how can we say then the no. of seriously injured traffic accidents will reduce.

I agree with A, but B could also weaken the conclusion.

Thanks,
Jai
_________________

MODULUS Concept ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities-158054.html#p1257636
HEXAGON Theory ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/hexagon-theory-tips-to-solve-any-heaxgon-question-158189.html#p1258308

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 41

Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be   [#permalink] 18 Aug 2013, 21:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by

People traveling in small cars are more likely to be

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.