It is currently 25 Nov 2017, 03:02

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Performing outstanding medical research requires more than a

Author Message
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Performing outstanding medical research requires more than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2004, 13:03
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Performing outstanding medical research requires more than a simple talent and more than a simple explanation. A drive to solve problems is clearly a part of it. Also critical is the ability to identify the right questions to ask. Thus, if we are to produce successful medical researchers, our universities must cultivate dedication and creativity rather than merely convey information.

If true, which of the following would be the strongest objection to the argument of the passage above?
A) researchers have a genuine curiosity about the world
B) scientific talent is only a small facet of what makes an oustanding researcher
C) the proper function of our universities is not to produce outstanding researchers, but to create well-rounded graduates
D) developing creativity in students is less important for the cultivation of research talent than is instilling a sense of dedication
E) teachers often cause harm when they attempt to do more than convey information
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Last edited by Paul on 10 Jun 2004, 08:59, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2004, 13:10
C does a serious damage to the equation. Johns Hopkins will beg to differ.

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2004, 13:53
(C) is negation of the assumption.

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 281

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Location: Ukraine

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2004, 14:26
C breaks the argument to smithereens

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 344

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2004, 03:02
another vote for E. If it is TRUE E would be most devastating to the argument in this passage. OA Bhai?

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 400

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: India

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2004, 03:23
Somehow I also think that (E) should be the answer, (Though now-a-days I'm going thru a bad patch as far as CRs' are concerned)
Though it is not mentioned that what kind of harm the option is talking about, but still I think (E) scores over (C), because (C) has a problem with term "well rounded graduate", and passage states that our universities must cultivate dedication and creativity rather than merely convey information.
This means universities must make a person creative, dedicated to work and along with these they should also convey information, which sounds like making an individual all-rounder.

Bit confused here

What's the OA, and any explanations?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2004, 05:09
OA is C. Anyone up to say why E is not good?
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 838

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2004, 08:49
Totally confused

Can anyone clearly state what the assumption in the argument is and how is the answer attacking the assumption?

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2004, 09:20
Vithal wrote:
Totally confused

Can anyone clearly state what the assumption in the argument is and how is the answer attacking the assumption?

Author says that to produce excellent researchers you need:
1- A drive to solve problems = dedication
2- the ability to identify the right questions to ask = creativity

Conclusion: If we(universities) are to produce good researchers, we need to focus on dedication and creativity and go beyond merely pouring information to students.

C says:
But the goal of our university is NOT to produce good researchers but to produce well-rounded individuals. Hence, there is no point in focusing in dedication and creativity and this would be the strongest objection to the author's claim

However, saying that there is harmed caused when you go beyond merely giving information to students does not give a reason as to how the focusing on dedication and creativity would not produce good researchers. For instance, despite there being harm caused to researchers, there could still be a good culture of dedication and creativity which would make good researchers. The point is we do not know which kind of "harm" is caused by giving more information and C more directly attacks the claim. Maybe someone would have a better reason to refute E...
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

10 Jun 2004, 09:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Performing outstanding medical research requires more than a

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.