Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 15:39 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 15:39

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13958
Own Kudos [?]: 32886 [9]
Given Kudos: 5776
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Jun 2017
Posts: 638
Own Kudos [?]: 530 [1]
Given Kudos: 4092
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 620 Q47 V30
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GPA: 3.1
WE:Corporate Finance (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13958
Own Kudos [?]: 32886 [2]
Given Kudos: 5776
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Oct 2013
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [1]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
Re: Physical theory implies that the existence of astronomical entities ab [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Elimination method for Q5:

A. The argument assumes the validity of the theory of general relativity. p1
B. The argument does not exhaustively rule out that seemingly invisible stellar entities could be entities other than black holes. p2 mentions Neutrons
C. The Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit may be higher than previously calculated. p3 higher limit of 10
D. The masses of many accretors in X-ray binaries thought to be black holes are less than the more conservative calculation of the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit.
E. The evidence given supports the existence of only certain types of black holes hypothesized to exist. p2 mentions black holes of weight 3.6, much larger like cygnus; p3 mentions super massive black holes
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2023
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: Physical theory implies that the existence of astronomical entities ab [#permalink]
Answer explanation of question 2 please
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13958
Own Kudos [?]: 32886 [0]
Given Kudos: 5776
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Physical theory implies that the existence of astronomical entities ab [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Yayu_sleeps wrote:
Answer explanation of question 2 please


Official Explanation


2. The passage indicates that an accretor found in an X-ray binary and which has a mass greater than Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit

Explanation

This question looks easy at first: an accretor in an X-ray binary with a mass above the limit is probably a black hole. But, on turning to the answer choices, we see that our knowledge only narrows the answer choices by one. We will have to get more specific and eliminate answer choices on the basis of what is stated in the passage. Looking back, we can see that the mass of these things above 3.6 and up to 14, but not automatically above 10, so both choices (B) and (C) are too restrictive. Is the thing moving or stationary? It's moving; that's how the calculation of binary stars work and it's the main subject of the beginning portion of the second paragraph: they rotate around their "common center of mass," and since this is "a point between them" (line 20), they must both necessarily be in motion.

The correct answer is (D).
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Physical theory implies that the existence of astronomical entities ab [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13958 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne