It is currently 24 Sep 2017, 18:10

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1890

Kudos [?]: 1354 [7], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2008, 20:52
7
KUDOS
29
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

38% (01:32) correct 62% (02:02) wrong based on 1376 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones. Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.

(B) The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.

(C) The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction.

(D) The first provides a certain outcome that the argument seeks to weigh against; the second is a consideration that support the main conclusion.

(E) The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.

[Reveal] Spoiler: Click for OA
OA = D. Check Karishma's post on second page for explanation
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Last edited by hazelnut on 07 Jun 2017, 00:14, edited 6 times in total.

Kudos [?]: 1354 [7], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 239

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2008, 21:04
sondenso wrote:
Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones. Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However,since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.
(B) The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.
(C) The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs againstthat prediction.
(D) The first provides a certain outcome that the agrument seeks to weigh against; the second is a consideration that support the main conclusion.
(E) The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.

C for me.

The first part of the boldface predicts that due to the higher costs of the seeds, farmers will not be compensated for using them byt their savings(outcome). The second one says that due to the increased demand, the use will be widespread and hence the farmers may after all be compensated(weighs against the prediction).

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 129

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2008, 21:04
sondenso wrote:
Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones. Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However,since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.
(B) The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.
(C) The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs againstthat prediction.
(D) The first provides a certain outcome that the agrument seeks to weigh against; the second is a consideration that support the main conclusion.
(E) The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.

C for me.

The first just presents some facts that, is later stated, will impact farmer's decision. The second adds some new info that will most likely counter the first in some way.

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1890

Kudos [?]: 1354 [1], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2008, 21:23
1
KUDOS
You have just fallen in the BIG trap. OA is not C
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1354 [1], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Posts: 210

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2008, 21:27
Grrr.. I fell for C as well. BTW, Sondenso, +1 for coming up with this toughie. What in the world is the OA? Can't wait..

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 129

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2008, 21:29
sondenso wrote:
You have just fallen in the BIG trap. OA is not C

Haha, well then please enlighten me.

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 16

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2008, 21:47
sondenso wrote:
You have just fallen in the BIG trap. OA is not C

Is it D? The main conclusion is that sales of these seeds would increase - but the 1st bold segment seems to prove otherwise....

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 239

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2008, 21:47
sondenso wrote:
You have just fallen in the BIG trap. OA is not C

Sondenso, I gave one of my retakes of Gmat Prep I and this was the first question in the verbal section, I marked it as C for the explanation given and got it right. did you get a different answer?
Would be very interested to know. One of those screwups of the prep software I have been reading about....

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1890

Kudos [?]: 1354 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2008, 22:07
Sunny143 wrote:
sondenso wrote:
You have just fallen in the BIG trap. OA is not C

Sondenso, I gave one of my retakes of Gmat Prep I and this was the first question in the verbal section, I marked it as C for the explanation given and got it right. did you get a different answer?
Would be very interested to know. One of those screwups of the prep software I have been reading about....

Yeah, the SLIGHLY similarity is very dangerous! In SC, we also have a war debate on the slighly similar two questiions! I found it interesting!
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1354 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Posts: 210

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2008, 22:14
sondenso wrote:
Sunny143 wrote:
sondenso wrote:
You have just fallen in the BIG trap. OA is not C

Sondenso, I gave one of my retakes of Gmat Prep I and this was the first question in the verbal section, I marked it as C for the explanation given and got it right. did you get a different answer?
Would be very interested to know. One of those screwups of the prep software I have been reading about....

Yeah, the SLIGHLY similarity is very dangerous! In SC, we also have a war debate on the slighly similar two questiions! I found it interesting!

Grrr.. So what in the world is the OA if it is not C as per your version of the question, Sondenso? Per sunny's experience, OA seems to be C, which comes as a big relief for me.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1890

Kudos [?]: 1354 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2008, 22:33
OA is D
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1354 [0], given: 1

CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2554

Kudos [?]: 502 [0], given: 0

Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jun 2008, 06:11
sondenso wrote:
Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones. Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However,since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.
(B) The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.
(C) The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs againstthat prediction.
(D) The first provides a certain outcome that the agrument seeks to weigh against; the second is a consideration that support the main conclusion.
(E) The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.

This is a very good one. I almost fell for C as well. I reread C though and something just didnt seem right.

The end of the paragraph is def. the main conclusion. Thus only D captures this.

Kudos [?]: 502 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 239

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jun 2008, 07:36
Guys...so what we are seeing here is another screwup....GMATPrep giving 2 answers for the same question....Holy Cr**...What is going on?
Attachments

GMATPrep Boldface.doc [85 KiB]

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 295

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 3

Location: Hungary
Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jun 2008, 08:02
Can somebody clarify this??

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 3

Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 74

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jun 2008, 14:21
I have also encountered this question on the GMATPrep with C being the OA. This gives me a lot of faith towards the people at Pearson Vue....

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 315

Kudos [?]: 98 [2], given: 0

Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jun 2008, 15:06
2
KUDOS
Sunny143 wrote:
Guys...so what we are seeing here is another screwup....GMATPrep giving 2 answers for the same question....Holy Cr**...What is going on?

Sunny , compare the boldface statements in your attachment with the question posted here , they differ . So GMATPrep is not buggy

Kudos [?]: 98 [2], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 239

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jun 2008, 17:21
Good Catch rpmodi....

However your conclusion is based on too small a sample....in fact we have had some strange issues with the software....I havent faced it yet but there are many posters that talk about this...

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 315

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jun 2008, 17:25
True . I should have said, in this case Gmatprep is not buggy . Do not certify the software as a whole

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 05 Oct 2011
Posts: 45

Kudos [?]: 101 [2], given: 16

Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Nov 2011, 21:20
2
KUDOS
sondenso wrote:
You have just fallen in the BIG trap. OA is not C

Is the OA D...In the gmat prep CR pdf the answer is given as C...So I am confused abt this,..I have chosen D .

Kudos [?]: 101 [2], given: 16

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 333

Kudos [?]: 176 [1], given: 291

Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2013, 22:23
1
KUDOS
Both the questions are different, at least the answer options definitely are.
OA is C for this question http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/pla ... t2270.html.

while OA is D for the above mentioned question.

Kudos [?]: 176 [1], given: 291

Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce   [#permalink] 12 Nov 2013, 22:23

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 39 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by