AWA Score: 5.5 out of 6!
I have used a GMATAWA auto-grader to evaluate your essay.
Coherence and connectivity: 4.5/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of idea and expression from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analysed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.
Paragraph structure and formation: 4.5/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs is evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.
Vocabulary and word expression: 4/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocaubulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word-usage. Simple is the best form of suave!
Good LuckTanveeshs wrote:
Could someone please grade my Argument essay and suggest to me how much would I secure
The recent report from the marketing department suggests that there is a need for allocation of a greater budget for the Super Screen movies to increase awareness. This is based on the pretext that very few people attended the Super Screen Movies this year, even though the movies had great reviews last year. Hence it is extrapolated that increasing public awareness would increase the number of viewers watching Super Screen movies. I would present three pieces of evidence that would suggest that why this recommendation is unreasonable.
The report from the marketing department states that fewer people attended the Super Screen produced movies than in any other year to augment this they suggested that advertisement shall be enhanced so people are made aware. I would like to ask that whether only lack of awareness is the reason for people not watching the super screen movies. Is lack of awareness a very major reason that is hindering people from doing watching Super Screen movies? In previous years people were watching the movie with lack of such funds required for the purpose of the advertisement so why is there such a sudden need for advertisement when the movies have already been in the market for many years? We must focus on finding the exact cause that has led to the downfall of Super Screen movies rather than just increasing our budget allocation.
The report from the marketing department states that the positive reviews for the Super Screen produced movies had increased in the previous year. The report does not provide any insights into the percentage of reviews that were received in this year. The report focuses on suggesting that as last year they received positive reviews they expect that the reviews must have been positive this year as well. They should instead focus on analyzing whether the reviews were positive for this year or where people critical about some part of the movies hence they are not watching them. A thorough analysis must be done on the present year reviews before making any judgment about increasing the budget for advertisement.
The solution provided by the management report suggests that increasing the budget for super screen movies would allow it it to solve the major problem of viewers not watching the films. They must understand the fact that advertisement comes at a certain cost. So they must be completely sure that it is only because of advertisement that super screen movies are lacking viewership. If thats not the case it would lead to spending more amount of money on advertisement and would not yield substantial results. And that would result in requiring even more money to cover the costs that have been spent for the movies as advertisement cost will be an add-on. Hence it would be suggested that instead of adding on to costs a more viable solution must be presented.
It could be determined that the correlation between super screen movies and advertisement, lack of research on current year reviews and a very costly solution for the problem suggests that the recommendation lacks reasonable evidence to sanction the greater share of its budget next year. The marketing team must work on strengthening the fact and then propose a valid argument to demand more funds.