GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Aug 2018, 13:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Police officers in Smith County who receive Special Weapons

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 May 2011
Posts: 223
Police officers in Smith County who receive Special Weapons  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 07 Jul 2011, 20:29
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

51% (01:49) correct 49% (02:16) wrong based on 242 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Police officers in Smith County who receive Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT)
training spend considerable time in weapons instruction and practice. This time
spent developing expertise in the use of guns affects the instincts of Smith County
officers, making them too reliant on firearms. In the past year in Smith County, in
12 of the 14 cases in which police officers shot a suspect while attempting to make
an arrest, the officer involved had received SWAT training, although only five percent
of the police force as a whole in the county had received such training.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

(A) In an adjacent county, all of the cases in which police shot suspects involved
officers with SWAT training.
(B) SWAT training stresses the need for surprise, speed, and aggression when
approaching suspects.
(C) Only 15 percent of Smith County’s SWAT training course is devoted to firearms
lessons.
(D) Among officers involved in the arrest of suspects in Smith County in the
past year, the proportion who had received SWAT training was similar to the
proportion who had received SWAT training in the police force as a whole.
(E) Some Smith County officers without SWAT training have not been on a firing
range in years.

Originally posted by bschool83 on 07 Jul 2011, 17:03.
Last edited by bschool83 on 07 Jul 2011, 20:29, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Posts: 68
Re: CR - Police officers in Smith County  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jul 2011, 18:45
A- Its irrelevant, talks about the other county
B- This is an opposite answer, it actually weakens the argument
C- Again an opposite answer
D- IMO is the correct answer, since the Officers who have been involved in arresting suspects in Smith County is a mix of SWAT trained and Non SWAT trained officers(as proven by this statement), the data clearly adds up to prove that officers receiving SWAT Training are more prone to use their firearms, and thus are more reliant on them.
E- Its not concerned to the arguments stated in the passage
_________________

Fight till you succeed like a gladiator..or doom your life which can be invincible

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 May 2011
Posts: 223
Re: CR - Police officers in Smith County  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jul 2011, 20:37
Threw me off a bit at first, as I didn't notice the representation. I then asked myself, does Smith County police officers represent the police force as a whole?
Retired Moderator
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1877
Re: CR - Police officers in Smith County  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2011, 03:02
bschool83 wrote:
Police officers in Smith County who receive Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT)
training spend considerable time in weapons instruction and practice. This time
spent developing expertise in the use of guns affects the instincts of Smith County
officers, making them too reliant on firearms. In the past year in Smith County, in
12 of the 14 cases in which police officers shot a suspect while attempting to make
an arrest, the officer involved had received SWAT training, although only five percent
of the police force as a whole in the county had received such training.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

(A) In an adjacent county, all of the cases in which police shot suspects involved
officers with SWAT training.
(B) SWAT training stresses the need for surprise, speed, and aggression when
approaching suspects.
(C) Only 15 percent of Smith County’s SWAT training course is devoted to firearms
lessons.
(D) Among officers involved in the arrest of suspects in Smith County in the
past year, the proportion who had received SWAT training was similar to the
proportion who had received SWAT training in the police force as a whole.
(E) Some Smith County officers without SWAT training have not been on a firing
range in years.


If 100 arrests were made;
**********************************
50 were made my SWAT trained officer.
50 were made my NON-SWAT trained officer.
***********************************
12 out of 50 SWAT trained officer used weapon
Just 2 out of 50 NON-SWAT trained officer used weapon
******************************************

While "D" strengthens the argument, the argument still assumes that the kind of criminals SWAT deals with is not different from the kind non-SWAT deals with.

Think of a situation, in which
Everyone arrested by SWAT possessed weapons and attempted to fire at SWAT officers in the process of arrest. Yet, only 12 got shot. Commendable!!!
None arrested by non-SWAT possessed weapons and only showed little to no resistance toward the arrest. Don't know how the 2 got shot. Perhaps, because the non-trained officers who took the shot were jittery and confused unlike SWAT trained who are usually composed even in extreme situation.

This question is okay because an argument may take multiple assumptions.
_________________

~fluke

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 23 Sep 2013
Posts: 141
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: Police officers in Smith County who receive Special Weapons  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Aug 2015, 23:33
fluke wrote:
bschool83 wrote:
Police officers in Smith County who receive Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT)
training spend considerable time in weapons instruction and practice. This time
spent developing expertise in the use of guns affects the instincts of Smith County
officers, making them too reliant on firearms. In the past year in Smith County, in
12 of the 14 cases in which police officers shot a suspect while attempting to make
an arrest, the officer involved had received SWAT training, although only five percent
of the police force as a whole in the county had received such training.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

(A) In an adjacent county, all of the cases in which police shot suspects involved
officers with SWAT training.
(B) SWAT training stresses the need for surprise, speed, and aggression when
approaching suspects.
(C) Only 15 percent of Smith County’s SWAT training course is devoted to firearms
lessons.
(D) Among officers involved in the arrest of suspects in Smith County in the
past year, the proportion who had received SWAT training was similar to the
proportion who had received SWAT training in the police force as a whole.
(E) Some Smith County officers without SWAT training have not been on a firing
range in years.


If 100 arrests were made;
**********************************
50 were made my SWAT trained officer.
50 were made my NON-SWAT trained officer.
***********************************
12 out of 50 SWAT trained officer used weapon
Just 2 out of 50 NON-SWAT trained officer used weapon
******************************************

While "D" strengthens the argument, the argument still assumes that the kind of criminals SWAT deals with is not different from the kind non-SWAT deals with.

Think of a situation, in which
Everyone arrested by SWAT possessed weapons and attempted to fire at SWAT officers in the process of arrest. Yet, only 12 got shot. Commendable!!!
None arrested by non-SWAT possessed weapons and only showed little to no resistance toward the arrest. Don't know how the 2 got shot. Perhaps, because the non-trained officers who took the shot were jittery and confused unlike SWAT trained who are usually composed even in extreme situation.

This question is okay because an argument may take multiple assumptions.



The language of D threw me off. D mentions figure related to arrests while the argument focuses on figure related to suspects shot.
Isn't D somewhat out of scope for the argument at hand?

Regards,
SR
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2015
Posts: 13
Schools: Booth '18 (II)
Police officers in Smith County who receive Special Weapons  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2015, 06:27
D does say "involved in the arrest of suspects", but if you read the stem carefully, you'll see that it's talking about suspects being shot during arrests.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 01 Feb 2015
Posts: 79
Re: Police officers in Smith County who receive Special Weapons  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2017, 01:09
Hello,

Can you please state the conclusion?
According to me it is: People who have taken the SWAT training are good at shooting a suspect while attempting to make an arrest.

I did not understand how option D is correct. I also did not understand how E is incorrect.

Can you please help me understand the gap?
VP
VP
User avatar
P
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1218
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Police officers in Smith County who receive Special Weapons  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2017, 09:44
Imo D
Among officers involved in the arrest of suspects in Smith County in the
past year, the proportion who had received SWAT training was similar to the
proportion who had received SWAT training in the police force as a whole.

It is essentially a fact supporting the argument that people who receive SWAT training are more likely to use their weapons.
_________________

Please give kudos if you found my answers useful

SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1849
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Police officers in Smith County who receive Special Weapons  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Dec 2017, 23:36
the key point here is to spot the shift in the scope from " Smith County" to "the whole forces". => D
A, B, and E are certainly out.
C weakens the argument.
=> Using POE, ones still can choose D as the answer.
Re: Police officers in Smith County who receive Special Weapons &nbs [#permalink] 09 Dec 2017, 23:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Police officers in Smith County who receive Special Weapons

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.